Exercise Intervention and Dexterity in Parkinson

November 1, 2016 updated by: Marie Carmen Valenza, Universidad de Granada

Therapeutic Intervention in Motor Disorders in Parkinson.

The investigators conducted an intervention based in proprioceptive exercises and balance tasks. The investigators also carried out a brief intervention in manual dexterity.

The study hypothesis is that a brief intervention in upper extremities and a exercise program can increase functionality in Parkinson.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Motor symptoms in Parkinson frequently affect upper extremities. This has been associated in previous studies with limitation in the performance of activities of daily living and, consequently, with a decrease in quality of life. The possibility that a brief intervention improves eye-hand dexterity in Parkinson's, may be a therapeutic option to improve the performance of activities of daily living. The investigators also conducted an intervention based in proprioceptive exercises and balance tasks to improve functionality.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Andalucia
      • Granada, Andalucia, Spain, 18071
        • Faculty of Health Sciences. University of Granada.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects diagnosed with Parkinson attending to the Parkinson Association of Granada.
  • Subjects who can complete the assessment battery of tests at the beginning and at the end of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Auditive and visual disturbances.
  • Cognitive problems.
  • Psychiatric pathology.
  • Sensorial disturbances.
  • Traumatic pathology of the hand.
  • Concomitant neurological conditions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group
30 people are recruited in order to the inclusion criteria for the study. The study include subjects who can complete the assessment battery of tests at the beginning and end in order to perform the control intervention.
Active upper limb range of movement exercises for 15 minutes.
Experimental: Exercise program group
30 people are recruited, diagnosed with Parkinson attending to the Parkinson Association of Granada aged between 40 and 65 years. No sex differences. The study include subjects who can complete the assessment battery of tests at the beginning and end.
Exercise program An brief exercise session including proprioceptive and dexterity activities
Other Names:
  • Plaster of resistance activities

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Manual dexterity
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months

Change from baseline to postintervention in dexterity. This is assessed using the Purdue Pegboard Test.

The Purdue pegboard test is a timed physical test used to measure manual dexterity. Test subjects are asked to place small pins into holes in the pegboard using a specific hand and following a specific process.

baseline, 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Grip strength
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months

Grip strength is measured using a Jamar dynamometer with a standard protocol allowing three attempts on each side. During each measurement, patients were sitting with their shoulder adducted and elbow flexed to 90°. The maximum value achieved from all six attempts was used in analyses.

Kg/cm2

baseline, 6 months
Pressure pain measure
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months.
The pressure pain threshold for each site (three points in upper extremities) is assessed using the pressure algometer. All assessments were made by the same investigator. All the subjects were trained to familiarize the subjects with the pressure algometry procedure before the measures in an anatomical site different from the chosen sites for this study.
baseline, 6 months.
Nervous assessment
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months.

Neurodynamic tests are used in upper extremities. It moves most of the nerves between the neck and hand, including the median nerve, radial and ulnar, brachial plexus, spinal nerves and cervical nerve roots.

The patient is placed supine position. It is measured with a goniometer.

baseline, 6 months.
Risk of falls.
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months.
The risk of falls is measured with the timed up and go. It measures in seconds, the time taken by an individual to stand up from a standard arm chair,walk a distance of 3 meters, turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down.
baseline, 6 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: M. Carmen Valenza, PH MD, Department of Physical Therapy. University of Granada.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

December 17, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 2, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson

Clinical Trials on Control intervention

Subscribe