A Registry to Evaluate the Direct Flow Medical Transcatheter Aortic Valve System (DISCOVER)

February 23, 2016 updated by: Direct Flow Medical, Inc.

A Registry to Evaluate the Direct Flow Medical Transcatheter Aortic Valve System for the Treatment of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

The purpose of this postmarket Registry is to assess the standard of care and clinical outcomes of the Direct Flow Medical Transcatheter Aortic Valve System used in clinical routine according to the approved commercial indications. Procedures and assessments required by this registry are generally considered standard of care for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement patients.

Evaluation criteria will be the incidence of mortality/morbidity and adverse events clinical performance, and hemodynamic performance of the DEVICE via ultrasound (echo) and angiographic imaging.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The patient population will include patients who are candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). According to routine practice, the heart team (interventional cardiologist and cardiothoracic surgeon) makes a choice to use the Direct Flow Medical Aortic Valve System, compared to other available TAVR prostheses, on the basis of clinical and surgical considerations. Therefore, the valve is implanted when the heart team decides that this product is best suited to the specific patient.

In order to be enrolled in this Registry, the patient must be a candidate for the implantation of the Direct Flow Medical Transcatheter Aortic Valve System, based on the commercial indications as stated in the Instructions for Use.

Therefore, candidates for this study must meet the following criteria (Indications for Use):

  1. Age > 70 years old
  2. Severe aortic valve stenosis determined by echocardiogram and Doppler:

    • mean gradient >40 mmHg or peak jet velocity >4.0 m/s AND
    • aortic valve area ≤0.8 cm2 or aortic valve area index ≤0.5 cm2/m2
  3. Symptomatic aortic valve stenosis (angina, congestive heart failure, NYHA Functional Class ≥ II, or syncope).
  4. Patient is an extreme risk candidate for open surgical aortic valve repair such that the site Investigators (interventional cardiologist and cardiothoracic surgeon) agree that medical factors preclude operation, based on the conclusion that the probability of death or serious morbidity exceeds the probability of meaningful improvement due to the patient's co-morbidities (such as, but not limited to, severe COPD, porcelain aorta, previous thorax irradiation) or logistic EuroSCORE ≥ 20.

All the Registry clinical evaluations and tests performed are generally considered standard of care for TAVR patients. When these recommendations conflict with the standard of care at the Registry site, the standard of care should prevail. In addition to the standard of care, the Sponsor recommends one brief additional evaluation (the EQ-5D quality of life measure) be conducted. Failure to perform this evaluation shall not be considered a protocol deviation.

Baseline Clinical Evaluation

  • Medical History and Physical Exam
  • 12 lead ECG and Arrhythmia Assessment
  • Logistic EuroSCORE/STS Score
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional status
  • Modified Rankin Score Assessment (mRS)
  • Current Cardiac Medications Baseline Imaging Studies
  • Transthoracic Echo (TTE)
  • CT Scan (ECG triggered, contrast enhanced)
  • Aorto-Iliac Angiogram:

    1. Peripheral Evaluation
    2. Coronary Evaluation

All patients will have clinical follow-up at hospital discharge, 30 days, 12 months and annually to 3 years and undergo the following evaluations:

  • Physical Exam
  • 12 lead ECG and Arrhythmia Assessment
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional status
  • Modified Rankin Score Assessment (mRS) if symptomatic for stroke
  • Current Cardiac Medications
  • Transthoracic echo (TTE) Patients in whom the heart team has planned to use the Direct Flow Medical Transcatheter Aortic Valve System valve, are informed of the DISCOVER Registry and their consent to participate is required. This study intends to monitor the clinical condition of the patient for a period of 3 years after the operation. By agreeing to participate, the patient agrees to undergo clinical assessments and specific tests at certain intervals (prior to the procedure; during the implantation; at hospital discharge, at 30 days after the procedure, and at 1 year, 2 and 3 years later); the patient also agrees to the collection of these daThe purpose of this Registry is to monitor outcomes data for the Direct Flow Medical Transcatheter Aortic Valve System in the Post Market phase. The primary outcome of interest is freedom from all-cause mortality at 30 days. The results from the pivotal CE mark study (IP 010) yielded a 30 day freedom from all-cause mortality rate of 97%. Should the "true" rate be 97%, then N=250 patients would provide an estimate of the rate with a margin of error of 2%, with 95% confidence.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Essen, Germany, 45138
        • Recruiting
        • Elisabeth Krankenhaus
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christopher Naber, MD
      • Milan, Italy, 20162
        • Recruiting
        • Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Federico DeMarco, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

71 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The Direct Flow Medical Transcatheter Aortic Valve System is intended for use in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis who require replacement of their native aortic valve but are extreme risk candidates for open surgical replacement. This is in accordance with the product Intended Use in the commercial Instructions for Use.

Description

Candidates for this study must meet all of the Indications criteria and none of the Contraindications.

Inclusion Criteria (Indications):

  1. Age > 70 years old
  2. Severe aortic valve stenosis determined by echocardiogram and Doppler:

    • mean gradient >40 mmHg or peak jet velocity >4.0 m/s
    • aortic valve area ≤0.8 cm2 or aortic valve area index ≤0.5 cm2/m2
  3. Symptomatic aortic valve stenosis (angina, congestive heart failure, NYHA Functional Class ≥ II, or syncope).
  4. Patient is an extreme risk candidate for open surgical aortic valve repair such that the site Investigators (interventional cardiologist and cardiothoracic surgeon) agree that medical factors preclude operation, based on the conclusion that the probability of death or serious morbidity exceeds the probability of meaningful improvement due to the patient's co-morbidities (such as, but not limited to, severe COPD, porcelain aorta, previous thorax irradiation) or logistic EuroSCORE ≥ 20.

Exclusion Criteria (Contraindications):

The Direct Flow Medical device is contraindicated for post implant balloon valvuloplasty.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
aortic valve disease
aortic valve replacement
Transthoracic Echo (TTE),CT Scan (ECG triggered, contrast enhanced),Aorto-Iliac Angiogram,Peripheral Evaluation,Coronary Evaluation,12 lead ECG,Arrhythmia Assessment, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional status, Modified Rankin Score Assessment (mRS) if symptomatic for stroke, Current Cardiac Medications, Transthoracic echo (TTE)
Other Names:
  • Direct Flow Medical Percutaneous Aortic Valve 18F System
  • Discover
  • Transcatheter

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Freedom from all-cause mortality at 30 days
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Device Success (VARC defined)
Time Frame: 30 days
  • Absence of procedural mortality AND
  • Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomic location AND
  • Intended performance of the prosthetic heart valve (no prosthesis-patient mismatch and mean aortic valve gradient <20mmHg or peak velocity <3m/s, AND no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation)
30 days
Early Safety
Time Frame: 30 days
  • All-cause mortality
  • All stroke (disabling and non-disabling)
  • Life-threatening bleeding
  • Acute Kidney Injury - Stage 2 or 3 (including renal replacement therapy)
  • Coronary artery obstruction requiring intervention
  • Major vascular complications
  • Valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure (BAV, TAVR, or SAVR)
30 days
Clinical efficacy
Time Frame: 30 days through 5 years
  • All-cause mortality
  • All stroke (disabling and non-disabling)
  • Hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure
30 days through 5 years
Clinical efficacy
Time Frame: 30 days through 5 years
• NYHA Class III or IV
30 days through 5 years
Clinical efficacy
Time Frame: 30 days through 5 years
• Prosthetic heart valve dysfunction (mean aortic valve gradient ≥20mm Hg, EOA ≤0.9-1.1cm2 [depending on body surface area] and/or DVI <0.35, AND/OR moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation)
30 days through 5 years
Time-related Valve Safety
Time Frame: 5 years

• Structural valve deterioration:

  • Valve-related dysfunction (mean aortic valve gradient (mean aortic valve gradient ≥20mmHg, EOA ≤0.9-1.1cm2 [depending on body surface area] and/or DVI <0.35, AND/OR moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation)
  • Requiring repeat procedure (TAVR or SAVR)
5 years
Time-related Valve Safety
Time Frame: 5 years
  • Prosthetic valve endocarditis
  • Prosthetic valve thrombosis
  • Thromboembolic events (e.g., stroke)
  • VARC bleeding, unless clearly unrelated to valve therapy (e.g., trauma)
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christopher Naber, MD, Elisabeth Krankenhaus Essen GmbH

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

May 3, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 24, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Replacement

Subscribe