Impact of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring on Anti-Infective Agents Amongst Severely Burned Patients Requiring ICU Admission

November 10, 2016 updated by: Anne Fournier, University of Lausanne Hospitals

Sepsis is the major cause of morbidity and mortality amongst burn patients. Burn shock and respiratory failure that used to be the major cause of mortality have progressively been replaced by sepsis and multiple organ failure. It is not rare that treatment failures occurs several weeks, or even months after injury as a consequence of sepsis usually caused by multi-drug resistant (MDR) microorganisms. Introduction of early surgery combined with topical and systemic antibiotherapy dramatically enhanced survival from sepsis after burn trauma, but further improvement is impaired by the rapid development of hard-to-treat MDR bacteria.

Correct prescription of anti-infective agents could be one way to curb the steadily increasing development of multidrug resistance. Administration of antibiotic to burn patient is complex: they frequently suffer from kidney dysfunction, they usually experience tremendous shifts of liquids between intra-vascular - inter-cellular and intra-cellular compartments, they often are hypo-albumin and protein-emic, and finally they present with a profoundly modified metabolism. All those aspects make this particular population of patients at high risk of both under or over prescription.

Monitoring of drug concentrations in the plasma of patients, so-called TDM for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, has been introduced to clinical practice for several decades primarily to avoid toxicity of a small number of drugs with narrow therapeutic windows. However, with the increasing availability of detection techniques, the number of drugs that can be measured in the plasma of patients has grown tremendously over the last decade. As a consequence, it is currently possible to monitor drug concentrations not only to prevent toxicity, but also to improve efficacy. For instance, several studies demonstrated that TDM improved antibiotic prescription in different populations of hospitalized patients, including critically ill patients, with a direct impact on outcome.

Such studies amongst burn patients are however lacking, although this particular population is at high risk to suffer from mis-prescription. We thus hypothesize that systematic TDM could improve antibiotic prescription in this peculiar population. To this end, we propose to implement a 3-year prospective, randomized, mono-centric, clinical trial that will analyze the impact of systematic TDM on anti-infective agent prescription amongst burned patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

39

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Vaud
      • Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, 1011
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All adult burn patients (≥ 18 years) admitted to the University Hospital of Lausanne during the study period receiving systemic anti-infectives agents for which TDM is available will be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not receiving systemic anti-infective agents therapy
  • Patients with length of hospital stay <72 hours
  • Patients refusing to give their written consent (or for which the therapeutic representative refuses) or incapable of understanding and lack of legal representative
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Children <18 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients with systematic TDM of anti-infective agents
Patients with systematic TDM of anti-infective agents and dosages adapted accordingly
No Intervention: Patients treated as usual

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time required to achieve anti-infective plasma concentrations in the target
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Up to 3 years
Numbers of concentrations within the target during an anti-infective agents course
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Up to 3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anti-infective agents consumption
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Up to 3 years
Development of antibiotic resistance
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Up to 3 years
Length of ICU stay based on TBSA
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Up to 3 years
Characterization of the pharmacokinetic profile of most widely used antibiotics
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Up to 3 years
Concentration - efficacy analysis
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Population pharmacokinetic (NONMEM software)
Up to 3 years
Failure / resolution rate of infectious episodes
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Up to 3 years
Concentration - toxicity analysis
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Population pharmacokinetic (NONMEM software)
Up to 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

October 18, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Protocol 195/13

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burn

Clinical Trials on Systematic Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for the intervention group

Subscribe