Direct Comparison of 2D Cardiac PET With 3D Cardiac PET

November 20, 2013 updated by: Cardiovascular Imaging Technologies

Direct Comparison of 2D Cardiac PET With 3D Cardiac PET Using a 3D Monte-Carlo Scatter COrrection Algorithm

Lowering the per-infusion dose of Rb-82 offers advantages of lessening radiation exposure and extending useable generator life. Prior studies have not shown equivalence of 3D vs 2D Rb-82 PET. The investigators therefore compare 3D PET after a lower Rb-82 dose (~20 mCi) processed using a Monte-Carlo driven scatter correction algorithm against conventional higher dosage (~50 mCi) 2D Rb-82 PET MPI.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This study re-examines 2D an 3D myocardial perfusion PET data from 19 subjects, mean age 65 years, mean BMI 30 kg/m2, 79% male. Rest and stress scans were acquired on a Siemens Accel™ PET scanner in 2D (septa extended) and 3D (septa retracted) modes. Rb-82 doses were rest 53+/-5 mCi and stress 53+/-6 mCi. Imaging times were 2D emission scan for 3 mins (90 sec delay post Rb-82 infusion), followed by a 3 minute, 3D gated emission scan (180 sec delay). Decay and shorter acquisition times led to a 62% reduction in the effective dosage 2D vs 3D datasets. 3D images were first pre-processed using a Monte-Carlo scatter and prompt gamma correction algorithm (Imagen3D™) then reconstructed using ImagenProTM (CVIT, Kansas City, MO). Reconstructed images were evaluated using relative, 17 segment raw scores (Cedars QPET). Studies were read by consensus of 2-blinded readers for: image quality (1-4, poor-excellent), interpretive certainty (1-3, low-high) and rest perfusion using a 17 segment model (0=normal; 1-3 = mild, moderate, or severe perfusion defects). Stress segmental scores were not evaluated due to differences in imaging start time post dipyridamole infusion.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
        • Saint Lukes Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

19 subjects, mean age 65 years, mean BMI 30 kg/m2, 79% male.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • >18 Years of Age
  • Have ability to provide informed consent
  • Have a technically adequate rest/stress Rb-82 perfsion PET study within the past 60 days

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or nursing feamle
  • Weight > 275 lbs
  • Have contraindications to adenosine stress testing
  • Unstable cardiac rhythm (atrial fibrillation, frequent PVCs
  • PTCA or CABG within the last 60 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Single Cohort
Population: 19 subjects, mean age 65 years, mean BMI 30 kg/m2, 79% male. Radionuclide Dosage: Rb-82 doses were rest 53+/-5 mCi and stress 53+/-6 mCi All were stress with Dipyridamole.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantitative Accuracy
Time Frame: 1 day
To establish the quantitative accuracy of reconstructed volumes using Imagen3DTM when compared to other methods.
1 day
Visual Assessment
Time Frame: 1 day
To establish that visual assessments of image quality and reader confidence using 3D data are equivalent to the other methods.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2013

Last Verified

November 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Subscribe