The Effect of an Inter-Disciplinary Program, Including MBSR, in Breast Cancer Survivors With Chronic Neuropathic Pain (InDepth)

July 19, 2019 updated by: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

The Effect of an Inter-Disciplinary Program, Including Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction, on Psychosocial Function, Pain Perception, Disability and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors With Chronic Neuropathic Pain

Chronic neuropathic pain is a common problem for breast cancer survivors. Even with the best medical treatment, some survivors continue to experience disabling pain. It is well-established that an interdisciplinary approach is key to the treatment of some types of chronic pain, but little research has been done on the effectiveness of interdisciplinary treatments for cancer survivors with chronic neuropathic pain. The investigators will evaluate the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary approach combining medical treatment and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) to reduce disability and improve quality of life among breast cancer survivors with chronic neuropathic pain. The investigators will also evaluate the impact of the program on psychological distress, pain cognitions, biomarkers of stress and immune function, cognitive function, as well as brain structure and function.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators will recruit 108 adult women survivors of breast cancer living with chronic neuropathic pain. All will have their medical treatment optimized by a pain medicine specialist before being randomly assigned to either an 8-week group MBSR program or a wait-list. All participants will complete self-report questionnaires, provide a hair sample for cortisol measurements and a blood sample to measure several markers of immune function at four different time points: before medical treatment, after medical treatment and before randomization to MBSR or waiting, after the completion of MBSR as well as at 3-month follow-up. A sub-sample will complete a series of tasks while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging before and after participation in MBSR.

The primary outcome is pain interference. The investigators will compare the proportion of participants who report reduced pain-related disability, as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory-Interference Scale, in each group. The primary hypothesis is that at 3-month follow-up, there will be at least 30% more responders (≥1.0 decrease in mean Brief Pain Inventory Interference score) in the interdisciplinary program in comparison to medical treatment alone.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

118

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
        • The Ottawa Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female.
  • 18 years or older.
  • Completed treatment for breast cancer a minimum of 1 year prior to study enrollment.
  • Have been experiencing neuropathic pain following their cancer treatment for a minimum of 6 months.
  • Report pain intensity levels ≥4 (moderate to severe).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metastatic disease or current evidence of cancer recurrence
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Unable to complete questionnaires in English or French.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Interdisciplinary program including MBSR
Participants assigned to this group will be enrolled in an Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program following medical treatment optimization. The MBSR program will be composed of eight weekly 2.5 hour sessions and one 6 hour session midway through the course.
Consists of eight weekly 2.5 hour sessions and one 6 hour session midway through the course. All sessions will be conducted by a psychologist or social worker with experience in chronic pain, formal MBSR training and 5 years of experience leading MBSR groups. To assess therapist adherence to the protocol, sessions will be recorded. A random selection of 50% of sessions will be rated by an MBSR trainer who completed the University of Massachusetts Centre for Mindfulness in Medicine, Health Care and Society Teacher Development Intensive using a checklist of specified treatment components. A percentage score for each session rated will be calculated to determine therapist adherence.
No Intervention: Wait-listed Control Group
Participants assigned to this group after medical treatment optimization will act as wait-list controls for the MBSR group. They will be enrolled in the MBSR workshop 3 months after the corresponding intervention group completes the program.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in pain-related disability, as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory - Pain Interference scale, at 3-month post-intervention.
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
The primary outcome is pain-related disability, as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory - Pain Interference scale. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Pain Interference consists of 7 numerical scales (0 to 10) rating pain interference with general activity, mood, walking ability, work, relations with other people, sleep and enjoyment of life.
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in neuropathic pain intensity, as measured by the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory, at 3 months post-intervention
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
Neuropathic pain intensity will be measured using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI), a self-report questionnaire that consists of 10 pain descriptors and two temporal items. Responses are rated on a numerical scale (0-10) and a total intensity score is calculated. Five sub-scores are also derived: spontaneous burning pain, spontaneous pressing pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain and paresthesia/dysesthesia.
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
Change from baseline in pain severity, as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory - Pain Severity scale, at 3 months post-intervention
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
Pain Severity will be measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Pain Severity. The BPI consists of 4 numerical scales (0 to 10) rating pain severity at its worst, at its least, on average, and at the time of filling out the measure. Each severity question is analyzed individually.
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
Change from baseline in mood states, as measured by the Profile of Mood States scale, at 3 months post-intervention
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
The Profile of Mood States (POMS-2A) will be used to measure mood disturbance. Participants are asked to rate 65 adjectives using a 5-point likert scale ( 0= not at all, to 4 = extremely) based on how they have been feeling during the past week, including the day they are filling out the questionnaire. A total mood disturbance score is calculated, as well as scores for 6 subscales: depression, tension-anxiety, anger-hostility, vigor-activity, fatigue, confusion-bewilderment.
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
Overall change in status from baseline, as measured by Patient Global Impression of Change scale, at 3 months post-intervention
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
The participants' perceived degree of change in overall status will be measured using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale. The PGIC uses a 7-point likert scale (very much worse, to very much better) to measure how much the participant feels their overall status has changed since the start of the study.
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
Change from baseline in stress, as measured by the Perceived Stress Scale, at 3 months post-intervention
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) will be used to measure the participants' perceived stress levels. The PSS uses a 5-point likert scale (0=Never, to 4=Very often) to measure the degree of stress a participant has experienced over the past month. A total perceived stress score is obtained by reversing the scores on items 4, 5, 7, and 8, and then summing across all 10 items. Higher scores indicate higher perceived stress.
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
Change from baseline in depressive symptoms, as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 scale, at 3 months post-intervention
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
The Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9) is a 9-item scale used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms over the past two weeks and is based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria for major depression. Total scores range from 0 to 27, and clinical cut-points correspond to mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression.
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
Change from baseline in pain catastrophizing, as measured by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, at 3 months post-intervention.
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a 13-item instrument which will evaluate the degree to which patients have negative self-statements and catastrophizing thoughts and ideations when in pain. The PCS uses a 5-point likert scale (0=not at all, 4=all the time) and consists of three subscales (rumination, magnification, helplessness).
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
Change from baseline in mindfulness, as measured by the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, at 3 months post-intervention.
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
Mindfulness will be measured using the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ). The FFMQ is a 39-item instrument measuring five aspects of mindfulness: Non-reactivity to inner experience, observing, describing, acting with awareness, and non-judging of experience. Participants are asked to use a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = never or rarely true; 5 = very often or always true) to rate how true of them they believe each statement to be.
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
Change from baseline in quality of life, as measured by the Short-Form-12 Health Survey, at 3 months post-intervention.
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
Quality of life will be measured by the Short-Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12v.2). The SF-12v2 is a brief, twelve-item self-report measure based on the Short-Form-36. It includes items assessing eight health domains, such as bodily pain, social functioning, role limitations due to physical health, and general health perceptions. Two summary scores, the physical composite scale (PCS) and mental composite scale (MCS) are computed based on the 12 items. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater quality of life.
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
Change from pre-intervention in biomarkers of stress, as measured by hair cortisol levels, at 3 months post-intervention.
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and 3 months post-intervention
Cortisol is a useful biomarker of stress levels. One cm hair samples will allow us to collect data on cortisol exposure over the past month.
Pre-intervention and 3 months post-intervention
Change from baseline in immune function, as measured by blood levels of interleukin-4, interleukin-6, interleukin-10, tumor necrosis factor - alpha, and C reactive protein, at 3 months post-intervention.
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
Six mL whole blood samples will be obtained from participants and the measurement of cytokine secretion and CRP will be performed. The concentrations of interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), tumor necrosis factor - alpha (TNF-α), as well as C reactive protein (CRP) production will be quantified and recorded. All samples and standards will be analyzed in duplicate.
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
Change from baseline in biomarkers of stress, as measured by telomere length, at 3 months post-intervention.
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
Total genomic DNA will be extracted from 0.2 mL of whole blood. The relative average Telomere Length (TL) will be determined and recorded. Samples will be analyzed in triplicate.
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention
Change from pre-intervention in neuronal health, as measured by white matter integrity, at 2 weeks post-intervention.
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-intervention
Changes in participants' neuronal health will be measured with MRI sessions that include diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). These imaging sessions will provide measures of white matter integrity (fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, radial diffusivity).
Pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-intervention
Change from pre-intervention in brain areas associated with emotional regulation, as measured by blood flow in the brain seen in functional magnetic imaging, at 2 weeks post-intervention.
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-intervention
Changes in blood flow to areas of participants' brains known to be associated with emotional regulation will be measured using functional magnetic imaging (fMRI).
Pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-intervention
Change from pre-intervention in brain structure, as measured by changes in structural volume different areas of the brain, at 2 weeks post-intervention.
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-intervention
High resolution magnetic resonance imaging will be used to look at the anatomy of participants' brains and measure changes in structural volume.
Pre-intervention and 2 weeks post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Patricia Poulin, PhD, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

April 29, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction

Subscribe