Multifocal Lens Centration and Its Effect on Visual Performance in a Presbyopic Population (BUICK)

May 28, 2015 updated by: University of Waterloo

The purpose of this study is to use a corneal topographer, a device that is readily available in most optometric practices, in order to determine the position of the multifocal (MF) contact lens (CL) optics in relation to the optics of the eye. The specific purpose of this study is to evaluate if there is a relationship between the positioning of the optics of the study lenses and the objective and subjective visual performance as well as participant satisfaction. The MF CL lenses will be fitted to two groups of participants (previously unsuccessful vs. currently successful MF CL wearers).

HYPOTHESES

  • The measurement of the power distribution acquired from the Medmont E300 corneal topographer is effective in determining MF CL lens centration and is a predictor of MF CL success.
  • There is a difference in MF CL centration, determined by corneal topography, between successful and unsuccessful MF CL wearers.
  • MF CL centration, determined by corneal topography, is correlated with visual performance, determined by ocular aberrometry, measures of visual acuity and subjective satisfaction.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3G1
        • Centre for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

42 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she:

  1. Is at least 42 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer;
  2. Has read and signed an information consent letter;
  3. Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule;
  4. Has previous experience with wearing MF CLs;
  5. Is able to be successfully fitted with all study lenses;
  6. Has a vertex-corrected spherical distance prescription of +6.00 to 8.00D (inclusive) in both eyes;
  7. Has a spectacle cylinder ≤0.75D in both eyes;
  8. Requires a reading addition of ≥+1.00D;

Exclusion Criteria:

A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:

  1. Is participating in any concurrent clinical or research study;
  2. Has any known active* ocular disease and/or infection;
  3. Has a systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable;
  4. Is using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable;
  5. Has a known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals to be used in the study;
  6. Is pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment;
  7. Is aphakic;
  8. Has undergone refractive error surgery;
  9. Has monocular best-corrected VA of worse than 20/30 in each eye;
  10. Has amblyopia or strabismus;
  11. Has anisometropia >2D between both eyes

    • For the purposes of this study, active ocular disease is defined as infection or inflammation which requires therapeutic treatment. Mild (i.e. not considered clinically relevant) lid abnormalities (blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction, papillae), corneal and conjunctival staining and dry eye are not considered active ocular disease. Neovascularization and corneal scars are the result of previous hypoxia, infection or inflammation and are therefore not active.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia
Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia contact lenses worn
Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia contact lenses worn
Experimental: PureVision2 for Presbyopia
PureVision2 for Presbyopia contact lenses worn
PureVision2 for Presbyopia contact lenses worn
Experimental: Biofinity Multifocal
Biofinity Multifocal contact lenses worn
Biofinity Multifocal contact lenses worn

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decentration
Time Frame: Day 1
Decentration (in mm and axis of decentration) of the multifocal contact lens optical center relative to ocular reference points (e.g. the pupil center or the line of sight), determined using difference maps produced by the Medmont E300 corneal topographer.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Acuity (high contrast) at distance
Time Frame: Day 1
Visual Acuity (high contrast) (logMAR) at distance 6m
Day 1
Visual Acuity (high contrast) at intermediate distance
Time Frame: Day 1
Visual Acuity (high contrast) (logMAR) at intermediate distance 1m
Day 1
Visual Acuity (high contrast) at near
Time Frame: Day 1
Visual Acuity (high contrast) (logMAR) at near (0.4m)
Day 1
Visual Acuity (low contrast) at distance
Time Frame: Day 1
Visual Acuity (low contrast) at distance 6m
Day 1
Visual Acuity (low contrast) at intermediate distance
Time Frame: Day 1
Visual Acuity (low contrast) (logMAR) at intermediate distance 1m
Day 1
Visual Acuity (low contrast) at near
Time Frame: Day 1
Visual Acuity (low contrast) (logMAR) at near (0.4m)
Day 1
Overall subjective rating of lens performance in real world tasks
Time Frame: Day 1
Participants rate overall satisfaction with vision with the contact lenses on a scale of 0-100, where 0=completely dissatisfied and 100=completely satisfied, after completing a series of real world tasks.
Day 1
Ocular aberrometry
Time Frame: Day 1
Ocular aberrometry as measured by a LADARWave aberrometer
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lyndon Jones, PhD, CCLR, University of Waterloo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

August 28, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 29, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20067

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Presbyopia

Clinical Trials on Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia

Subscribe