FAST Examination During Emergency Practice (FAST)

November 10, 2014 updated by: Lukasz Szarpak, International Institute of Rescue Research and Education

Knowledge, Attitude and Practice About Focused Assessment With Sonography in Trauma Among Paramedics. Randomized Crossover Manikin Trial

The study evaluates the knowledge, attitude and practice about Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma among emergency medicine practitioners in Poland.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Warsaw, Poland, 04-628
        • Recruiting
        • International Institute of Rescue Research and Education

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Paramedics currently practicing in a Polish emergency department units and emergency medical services
  • Age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to participate in all aspects of the study prior to study begin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: normal model patient
Images of the ultrasound window were captured to disk and later evaluated by an expert in emergency medicine. In this study, the FAST examination was measured to the perihepatic space (also called Morison's pouch or the hepatorenal recess), perisplenic space, pericardium, and the pelvis.
Ultrasonography device
Other Names:
  • SonoScape S6 Portable Ultrasound Machine
Experimental: ascites positive model patient
Images of the ultrasound window were captured to disk and later evaluated by an expert in emergency medicine. In this study, the FAST examination was measured to the perihepatic space (also called Morison's pouch or the hepatorenal recess), perisplenic space, pericardium, and the pelvis.
Ultrasonography device
Other Names:
  • SonoScape S6 Portable Ultrasound Machine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tests of Knowledge of the FAST Examination
Time Frame: 1 day
knowledge-based measures used to evaluate participants' knowledge of FAST-examination-related concepts (Survey)
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FAST Performance Test
Time Frame: 1 day
The performance test required participants to conduct a FAST examination on two model patients (one normal, one ascites positive). No help or feedback was given to the participants.
1 day
Window acquisition time
Time Frame: 1 day

Identification of FAST Window Quadrants and Diagnostic Interpretation of FAST Windows.

The window acquisition time was measured with a stopwatch and represented the period between first contact of the probe with the model patient's body and when the participant said "stop" to indicate an adequate window or the participant's judgment that he or she could not acquire the window.

1 day
Window quality
Time Frame: 1 day
For each acquired window, an expert evaluated the quality of the window. The window was rated as "excellent, fair, poor, or other." "Other" captured situations where the window acquired was nondiagnostic. Window quality was dichotomized into two categories, "excellent or not excellent," and subsequent analyses examined the number of participants that acquired "excellent" windows by quadrant (perihepatic space (also called Morison's pouch or the hepatorenal recess), perisplenic space, pericardium, and the pelvis and suprapubic quadrant) and patient type (normal, positive).
1 day
Diagnostic accuracy
Time Frame: 1 day
For each acquired window, the participant rendered a diagnosis of that window. An expert evaluated the quality of the diagnosis. The diagnosis was rated as "correct, incorrect, or other." "Other" captured situations where the window acquired was nondiagnostic. For analysis purposes, diagnostic accuracy was dichotomized into two categories, "correct or not correct," and subsequent analyses examined the number of participants that interpreted the window correctly by quadrant (perihepatic space (also called Morison's pouch or the hepatorenal recess), perisplenic space, pericardium, and the pelvis and suprapubic quadrant) and patient type (normal, positive).
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 13, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 13, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2014

Last Verified

November 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FAST/2014/02

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trauma

Subscribe