Clinical Validation of a Dried Blood Spot Method for Analysis of Immunosuppressives and Antifungals in Pediatrics (PROTECT)

May 9, 2022 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

Clinical Validation of a Dried Blood Spot (DBS) Method for the Analysis of Immunosuppressive and Antifungal Drugs in Pediatric Patients (Part of the PROTECT Study).

This is a clincial validation study of a dried blood spot (DBS) method for the analysis of immunosuppressive and antifungal agents currently subject of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in a pediatric population.

The primary goal is to clinically validate a finger prick DBS method compared to conventional venous sampling for the analysis of 5 immunosuppressive and 4 azole antifungal drugs in the pediatric population. Secondairy goals include feasibility of the finger prick DBS method in the target population, to design an inventory of costs that will be incurred in future health-economic analyses and to construct a population PK model based on the available data collected for the primariy goal.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) offers the possibility to individualize and improve a patient's pharmacological treatment, based on the measurement of drug concentrations in biological samples. Conventionally, TDM is performed with blood or plasma obtained by venous blood sampling. This method is associated with several challenges such as i) the need for the patient to travel to the hospital or health center; ii) special conditions for sample transport to guarantee stability of the analyte and to decrease the biohazard risk; iii) sampling times not always representing the preferable peak or trough concentrations; iv) the method being invasive and v) delay of the outcome of the analyses with regard to the outpatient visit.

The Dried Blood Spot (DBS) may offer a solution for all these challenges. DBS is thought to offer benefits over plasma venous sampling for TDM. The main purpose of the PROTECT (Personalized treatment of immunosuppressive and antifungal drugs through continuous home based monitoring with Dried Blood Spot sampling techniques in pediatric patients) study is to improve therapeutic management and patient participation in pediatric patients treated with antifungal and immunosuppressive agents. PROTECT is mainly financed by a ZonMW grant 'Goed Gebruik Geneesmiddelen'.

Four patient organizations are actively involved in the PROTECT study.

Objective of the study:

Primairy To clinically validate a finger prick DBS method compared to conventional venous sampling for the analysis of 5 immunosuppressive and 4 azole antifungal drugs in the pediatric population. Secondairy

  • Feasibility of the novel finger prick DBS method in the pediatric population will be assessed. This includes scoring of relevant characteristics (attributes) of blood drawing methods for TDM, evaluation of the experience and attitude of both patients and parents regarding finger prick DBS sampling and evaluation of the understanding of the written instructions provided for performing the finger prick at home. The data obtained in this validation study will be used for the implementation of the DBS in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) being a less invasive procedure, and as a base for a discrete choice-experiment as part of the HTA.
  • To design an inventory of types of costs that will be incurred in the process of DBS-based and conventional TDM as a preparation step for later health economic analysis.
  • Data from this study will be used to construct a population pharmacokinetic model to optimize dosing and design new guidelines.

This is an observational mono-centre study in which DBS sampling is compared with conventional sampling for TDM in a steady state situation.

Clearly, information on feasibility of DBS sampling in children and on costs relevant to DBS sampling in children can only be obtained through actual sampling in children.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

93

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
        • Radboud University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Pediatric hemato-oncology and primariy immunodeficient patients and pediatric renal transplantation patients.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged between 2 and 18 years
  • Admitted to the Radboudumc pediatric ward
  • Having a venous catheter
  • Treated with at least 1 of the 9 drugs of interest
  • The drug concentration being at steady state
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parents and/or patients are not able to understand the Dutch language

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Mycophenolic acid
Patients treated for their regular patient care with mycophenolic acid.
The association between conventional venous sampling and finger prick dried blood spot (DBS) will be associated by drawing blood in both ways.
Cyclosporin
Patients treated for their regular patient care with cyclosporin.
The association between conventional venous sampling and finger prick dried blood spot (DBS) will be associated by drawing blood in both ways.
Tacrolimus
Patients treated for their regular patient care with tacrolimus.
The association between conventional venous sampling and finger prick dried blood spot (DBS) will be associated by drawing blood in both ways.
Sirolimus
Patients treated for their regular patient care with sirolimus.
The association between conventional venous sampling and finger prick dried blood spot (DBS) will be associated by drawing blood in both ways.
Everolimus
Patients treated for their regular patient care with everolimus.
The association between conventional venous sampling and finger prick dried blood spot (DBS) will be associated by drawing blood in both ways.
Voriconazole
Patients treated for their regular patient care with voriconazole.
The association between conventional venous sampling and finger prick dried blood spot (DBS) will be associated by drawing blood in both ways.
Posaconazole
Patients treated for their regular patient care with posaconazole.
The association between conventional venous sampling and finger prick dried blood spot (DBS) will be associated by drawing blood in both ways.
Itraconazole+metabolite
Patients treated for their regular patient care with itraconazole.
The association between conventional venous sampling and finger prick dried blood spot (DBS) will be associated by drawing blood in both ways.
Fluconazole
Patients treated for their regular patient care with fluconazole.
The association between conventional venous sampling and finger prick dried blood spot (DBS) will be associated by drawing blood in both ways.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
drug concentration
Time Frame: predose, 2 samples postdose, max 6 hours post dose
The outcome measure is a composite of several blood concentrations, obtained by three individual blood drawing moments per patient. The related endpoint is the evaluation of the association between the concentration obtained by venous sampling and the concentration obtained by means of DBS sampling. The predictive performance of the DBS method as a measure for the venous concentration will be evaluated.
predose, 2 samples postdose, max 6 hours post dose

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 day
The related endpoint is the response to a questionnaire. Results will be used to prepare implementation of the novel method for home-based monitoring as well as to prepare a HTA analysis.
1 day
costs
Time Frame: 2 years
Costs of blood drawing methods will be collected.The cost types will function as a basis for future HTA analysis of this novel sampling method compared to conventional venous sampling.
2 years
Area under the curve
Time Frame: 6h period
Blood concentrations will be used to calculate the area under the concentration time curve (AUC). The outcome measure will be a composite of population estimates of the pharmacokinetic parameters AUC, maximal concentration (Cmax), time to maximal concentration (Tmax), clearance (CL), volume of distribution (Vd) and elimination half-life (t1/2).
6h period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roger Bruggemann, PharmD PhD, Radboud University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 3, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 3, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 1, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UMCN-AKF 14.02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Kidney Diseases

Clinical Trials on blood drawing

Subscribe