Assessment of Bimodal Contribution in Adult Cochlear Implant Users

January 2, 2015 updated by: MICHAL.LUNTZ, Bnai Zion Medical Center

Assessment of the Contribution of the Combined Acoustic Hearing Via a Hearing Aid and Electric Hearing Via a Cochlear Implant in Adult Bimodal Users With Moderate to Severe Residual Hearing in the Implanted and Non Implanted Ear.

To evaluate the combination of electric hearing through Cochlear Implant and acoustic hearing through hearing aid in bimodal users with moderate-to-severe hearing loss in the non-implanted ear. The research will also provide pilot study data on unilateral Cochlear Implant recipients with residual useful acoustic hearing in the implanted ear whose acoustic hearing has been preserved.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Many current unilateral Cochlear Implant users have some residual acoustic hearing in the opposite ear as well as in the implanted ear. The amount of useful residual acoustic hearing varies among these implantees. There are several acoustic and electric combinations in the bilateral-bimodal listening mode depending on the amount of useful residual acoustic hearing in each ear. The combination of low frequency acoustic information provided by the hearing aid on each ear, completes the high frequency electric information provided by the Cochlear Implant (complementary bimodal benefit). Each of the different rehabilitation combinationsfor unilateral Cochlear Implant users enablesa unique integration of the three aspects of bilateral hearing bilaterality, binaurality and bimodality which may provide significant advantages over unilateral Cochlear Implant stimulation in terms of speech perception in noise, complementary information as well as localization abilities.

The study will include 20 bilateral-bimodal users with moderate-to-severe hearing loss at 250 Hz, 500 Hz and 1000 Hz in the non-implanted ear, who use hearing aids for at least 75% of their waking hours. Evaluation utilizes bilateral-binaural and bimodal complementary effects task-specific test batteries based on published doctoral research project. The assessment protocol consisted of tests that include various speech materials, different maskers, presentation of the noise from different locations in space, right/left speech lateralization, pitch-related tasks and subjective questionnaires. All tests will be administered in three listening conditions: Cochlear Implant -alone, hearing aid-alone and Cochlear Implant +hearing aid.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Haifa, Israel
        • Recruiting
        • Bnai Zion Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michal Luntz, MD
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Noam Yehudai, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Talma Shpak, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral-bimodal users
  • With moderate-to-severe hearing loss at 250 Hz, 500 Hz and 1000 Hz in the non-implanted ear
  • Who use hearing aids for at least 75% of their waking hours

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Bimodal users

Bilateral-bimodal users with moderate-to-severe hearing loss who use hearing aids for at least 75% of their waking hours.

Administration of Speech perception tests and self-rating questionnaire

Speech perception test results and self-rating questionnaire scores will be analyzed by means of non-parametric statistical tests. The statistical tests will be chosen in accordance with the number and type of variables in each test. Correlation between audiological variables (aided and unaided hearing thresholds in the non implanted ear, aided speech perception abilities in the HA-alone condition) and the bilateral-bimodal benefit will be examined. Moreover, possible relationship between self-rating questionnaire scores and speech perception test results will be assessed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Speech perception task specific tests using assessment protocol which will include 6 speech perception tests in quiet and noise listening conditions.
Time Frame: 12 months

ests designed to examine the contribution of bilateral-binaural benefits:

  1. Semantically unpredictable sentence recognition presented from the front in the presence of a two-male-talker masker.
  2. Horizontal right/left speech lateralization in quiet
  3. Perception of monosyllabic words (HAB) in competing three-male-talker babble.
  4. Semantically unpredictable sentence recognition in the presence of one competing talker using a reversed speech sentence spoken by only two different talkers with different F0 characteristics.
  5. Perception of intonation.
  6. Evaluation of the difference between the perception of natural prosody speech and the perception of speech with flattened F0 contour
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of functional performance in daily life using self-repot questionnaires
Time Frame: 12 months
the Speech, Spatial and Quality (SSQ) questionnaire and the Hearing Handicap Questionnaire (HHQ).
12 months
Standard basic speech perception tests
Time Frame: 12 Months
Standard basic speech perception tests which will enable to characterize the basic speech perception abilities of the bilateral-bimodal users by means of a commonly utilized assessment tool: monosyllabic word discrimination on the Hebrew version of the AB Word List (HAB) in quiet; Hebrew version of the CID sentence recognition test in quiet and the Hebrew version of the CID sentence recognition test in the presence of four-talker-babble noise with the SNR fixed at +5dB, speech and noise presented from the front.
12 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michal Luntz, MD, Bnai Zion Medica Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 24, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2015

Last Verified

January 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Deafness

Clinical Trials on Speech perception tests and self-rating questionnaire

3
Subscribe