Peer- and Self-rating of Open Surgery Skills (self-rate)

July 24, 2017 updated by: Diana Haunstrup Bregner Overgaard, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation

Peer- and Self-rating of Open Surgery Skills Using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills

The study group want to investigate whether doctors, who are in the beginning of their training to become surgeons, can rate themself and their peers using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills. Participants have participated in a 6 weeks course in basic open surgical skills. At the end of the course the participants will be examined at at videotaped test. The participants will be asked to rate their own video and two videos of other trainees' performances. Ratings will be compared to expert ratings.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study is a prospective, descriptive study investigating whether doctors are able to rate their own and their peers' performance in a basic open surgery skill course. At the end of the course in basic open surgery, participants will be examined at the post-test as described in the protocol "The effect of group dynamics in surgical skill training". After the participants complete the post-test, participants will be asked to participate in this additional study. The participants will receive no instructions on this additional study, before they complete the study "The effect of group dynamics in surgical skill training".

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Setting The participants will follow the basic open surgery skill course as described in the protocol "The effect of group dynamics in surgical skill training".

Participants Participants are medical doctors and medical students who completed the study "The effect of group dynamics in surgical skill training" as part of the control group.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants are medical doctors and medical students who completed the study "The effect of group dynamics in surgical skill training" as part of the control group.
  • The participants must be willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who do not finish the basic open surgery course
  • Medical doctors and medical students enrolled in the study "The effect of group dynamics in surgical skill training" that are randomized to dyad training

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differences between the participants' rating score of his/her own performance and the experts' rating score of the participants' performance
Time Frame: six months
To investigate whether medical doctors are able to rate their own performance in a basic open surgery skill course using a modified OSATS rating scale
six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differences between the participants' rating score of his/her peers performances and experts' rating score of the peers' performances
Time Frame: six months
To investigate whether medical doctors are able to rate their peers' performance in a basic open surgery skill course using a modified OSATS rating scale
six months
Differences in the correlation of self-rating score and expert rating score between participants who are rated in the upper quartile by experts compared to participants who are rated in the lower quartile by experts
Time Frame: Six months
To investigate the correlation between level of competency and the ability to self-rate in a basic open surgery skill course using a modified OSATS rating scale
Six months
Differences in the correlation of participants' rating scores and experts' rating scores between participants first and second rating of their peers performance.
Time Frame: six months
To investigate whether there is progression in the participants ability to rate their peers performances using OSATS
six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 18, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H-16031885

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We plan to share the data within the study group

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Expected to be published during 2018

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery

Clinical Trials on Peer- and self-rating

Subscribe