Comparison of In-lab PSG to WP200 for Assessing Sleep Parameters

August 25, 2015 updated by: Itamar-Medical, Israel

Testing for Sleep Apnea in Adolescence Subjects With the WP200/WP200U Compared to an In-lab Overnight PSG Testing

The WP200 and/or WP200U will be compared with a PSG system which is a digital physiological recorder system, cleared for use for clinical sleep studies. The manual scoring of the PSG data, performed by a trained and authorized scorer, according to the AASM (American Academy of Sleep Medicine) guidelines, serves as a "gold standard" for all determinations of efficacy.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will include adolescence subjects, age 12-17, referred to the clinical sleep laboratory for an overnight sleep study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 12-17
  • Subjects with a legal guardian that is able to read understand and sign the informed consent form
  • Willing to sleep with the WP200/WP200U and PSG simultaneously in the sleep lab

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Permanent pacemaker: atrial pacing or VVI without sinus rhythm.
  • Use of one of the following medications: alpha blockers, short acting nitrates (less than 3 hours before the study)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
PSG and WatchPAT200 in subjects age12-17
Adolescents refered to a sleep lab for sleep lab for full night PSG

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
sensitivity, specificity, obtained by the WP200/WP200U device automatic-computerized analysis as compared to the manual scoring of the PSG that is considered the "gold standard"
Time Frame: 1 night
1 night
correlation obtained by the WP200/WP200U device automatic-computerized analysis as compared to the manual scoring of the PSG that is considered the "gold standard"
Time Frame: 1 night
1 night
Agreement obtained by the WP200/WP200U device automatic-computerized analysis as compared to the manual scoring of the PSG that is considered the "gold standard"
Time Frame: 1 night
1 night

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 17, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 4, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 27, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2015

Last Verified

February 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • WP200/U-adolescence- 001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe