Impact of the Distribution to Attending Physicians of a Nominative List of Their Patients Not Participating in the Organised Screening of Colorectal Cancer (IDLN)

June 22, 2026 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Impact of the Distribution to Attending Physicians of a Nominative List of Their Patients Not Participating in the Organised Screening of Colorectal Cancer: Randomised Study Measuring the Impact on Participation

Objective : to demonstrate that providing to GPs a list of their patients who are not compliant to colorectal cancer screening will 1) enhance patient participation to screening, and 2) decrease the proportion of cancer diagnosed outside the screening organisation. Design : Randomised controlled study, 3 parallel arms. Enrollment: GPs allocated in the 3 groups of the study will be all GPs 1) from the "Loire-Atlantique and Vendée" geographic area (1300 GPs on average) and 2) who have more than 100 patients in their patient list (based on data provided by the Healthcare Insurance System Services). Patients will be eligible to the study depending on their eligibility to the Faecal Occult Blood Test for colorectal cancer screening : 1) they should be older than 50 and younger than 74; 2) they should not have a personal history of colorectal cancer (or history of adenoma bigger than 1 cm) nor a family history of colorectal cancer. Main outcomes measures : Patient participation to colorectal cancer screening, and number of cancers screened in (versus diagnosed outside) the screening procedure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background:

Participation rate for colorectal cancer screening in France is 39%. In a Cochrane review, patient participation rates to colorectal cancer screening varies from 30 to 60%. Policy makers usually consider that these participation rates should be higher, based on the premise that the impact of the screening mainly depends on patient participation. In France, patients at average risk of colorectal cancer are eligible to the Faecal Occult Blood Test for colorectal cancer screening if: 1) they are older than 50 and younger than 74; 2) they have no personal history of colorectal cancer (or history of adenoma bigger than 1 cm) and no family history of colorectal cancer.

Objective:

To demonstrate that providing to GPs a list of their patients who are not compliant to colorectal cancer screening will 1) enhance patient participation to screening, and 2) decrease the proportion of cancer diagnosed outside the screening organisation. Design : Randomised controlled study, 3 parallel arms.

Design:

Randomized controlled study. 3 parallel arms.

Setting:

Primary care setting in France.

Enrollment:

In this study, the intervention will focus on the GP. The statistical unit for the results analysis will be the GP. GPs allocated in the 3 groups of the study will be all GPs 1) from the "Loire-Atlantique and Vendée" geographic area (1300 GPs on average) and 2) who have more than 100 patients in their patient list (based on data provided by the Healthcare Insurance System Services).

Intervention:

GPs allocated to the intervention group (A) will receive a list of the patients who are not compliant to colorectal cancer screening, while GPs allocated to the others groups will not receive the corresponding information.

Randomization:

3 groups : (A) GPs will receive a list of the patients who are not compliant to colorectal cancer screening, (B) GPs will receive a document providing general information on colorectal cancer screening, (C) GPs will not receive any specific document (they continue regular practice).

Primary outcome measure: Patient participation to colorectal cancer screening Secondary Outcome Measures: number of cancers screened in (versus diagnosed outside) the screening procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48649

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • CHU de Nantes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 74 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

In this study, the statistical unit is the GP.

Inclusion Criteria:

GPs allocated in the 3 groups of the study will be all GPs

  • 1) from the "Loire-Atlantique and Vendée" geographic area (1300 GPs on average)
  • 2) who have more than 100 patients in their patient list (based on data provided by the Healthcare Insurance System Services).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • GPs who have less than 100 patients in their patient list

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: A: nominative list

Providing a list of patients not compliant with CRC sreening

General Practitioners allocated to the intervention group (A) will receive:

  • a nominative list of their patients who were not compliant to colorectal cancer screening.
  • a document providing general information about colorectal cancer screening
GPs allocated to the intervention group (A) will receive a list of the patients who are not compliant to colorectal cancer screening, while GPs allocated to the others groups will not receive this information.
Active Comparator: B: general information

Providing general information about CRC screening

General Practitioners allocated to group (B) will receive:

- a document providing general information about colorectal cancer screening (but will not receive the nominative list of patients non compliant to colorectal cancer screening)

No Intervention: C: usual practice
General Practitioners allocated to group (C) will not receive any information (as in usual practice)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patient participation rate to colorectal cancer screening
Time Frame: 12 months after starting date of the study
12 months after starting date of the study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of cancers screened in (versus diagnosed outside) the screening procedure.
Time Frame: 12 months after starting date of the study
12 months after starting date of the study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

August 4, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe