Efficacy of Deep Haptic Massage in Fibromyalgia : Preliminary Study (FEM)

November 17, 2020 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a common chronic musculoskeletal pain disorder of unknown etiology, characterized by generalized body pain, hyperalgesia and other functional and emotional comorbidities. Women are predominantly affected. Long term prognosis of FMS might be severe by its physical and psychological consequences. The etiology of FMS remains unknown but recent studies suggest a disorder of central pain modulation, neurotransmitters, sympatho-adrenal and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system and peripheral muscles issues. Indeed, muscular abnormalities with a decrease of ATP and micro vascularization have been reported, inducing muscle weakness and local biochemical changes that participate to pain hyper sensitivity. Treatment of FMS is only symptomatic, often difficult, associating pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies. Massages are largely used in FMS and are included in chronic pain management recommendations.

Massages are recognized as haptic when the hands of the practitioner move on the skin of the patient; haptic massage is superficial if the pressure applied on the skin is similar to the weight of the hand and it's a deep haptic massage when the pressure applied is over the weight of the hand, allowing reaching deep muscle structure. Deep haptic massages are largely used for athlete to improve muscle recovery and treat tendinitis. All massages evaluate in FMS are superficial haptic massage; they are recognized as efficient on pain, anxiety and depression if they are performed at least on 5 weeks but these effects are transient et remain to be optimized. The efficacy of deep haptic massage has not been evaluated in pathological conditions. The investigators hypothesize that, in FMS patients, deep intramuscular maneuvers may solicit sensitive receptors, stimulating large caliber fibers A lemniscal conveyed by the way that bypass chronic pain information carried by the C fibers of the extra-lemniscal pathway: this is the "Gate Control" theory for inhibiting pain information.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nice, France, 06000
        • BREUIL

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women aged 18 to 65 years
  • Fibromyalgia defined according to ACR criteria
  • Widespread pain index (WPI) ≥ 7 and Symptom Severity (SS) scale score ≥ 5 or WPI between 3 and 6 and SS scale score ≥ 9;
  • Presence of symptoms at the same intensity for at least 3 months;
  • Available to participate in the proposed sessions six weeks
  • Drug Therapy Stable fibromyalgia for one month without amendment in the next 6 months, excluding analgesics
  • Having signed an informed consent
  • Affiliated to a health insurance plan

Exclusion criteria

  • Vulnerable people: pregnant women, and breastfeeding women (a urine pregnancy test will be performed), minors, adults under guardianship, deprived of freedom, those hospitalized without consent, hospitalized in a health and social facility for other purposes as research, people unable to consent
  • Chronic Inflammatory joint disease associated
  • Other non-pharmacological treatments (acupuncture, cognitive-behavioral therapy etc ...)
  • Impairments severe visceral: heart, kidney, liver in the previous year
  • Individualized psychiatric pathology
  • Current Infectious diseases
  • Skin lesions contra-indicating massage

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Haptic massage
6 weeks of deep haptic massage at 2 sessions of 30 minutes per week.
6 weeks of deep haptic massage at 2 sessions of 30 minutes per week.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness measured by QIF (Questionnary Impact Fibromyalgia) score
Time Frame: At the end of 6 weeks of deep haptic massage at 2 sessions of 30 minutes per week.

To evaluate the effectiveness of the Massage Haptic in 20 women with FMS (defined according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology and active disease defined by a Widespread Pain Index (WPI)vscore ≥ 7 and a symptom severity score (SS) ≥ 5 or WPI between 3 and 6 and SS score ≥ 9), recruited in the clinics of the Rheumatology Department of Nice, after 6 weeks of deep haptic massage at 2 sessions of 30 minutes per week.

Primary endpoint: overall score of impact questionnaire fibromyalgia (QIF). Indeed, in the fibromyalgia studies QIF is used as a criterion for evaluating the effectiveness of drug treatments like non-drug treatments.

At the end of 6 weeks of deep haptic massage at 2 sessions of 30 minutes per week.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness on pain measured by items 4 to 10 of QIF score
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months

To assess the continuing effects at 3 and 6 months and the impact on pain The effectiveness of haptic massage will be evaluated in the same manner as the main objective.

The effectiveness of haptic massage on pain will be evaluated through the individual analysis of the items 4 to 10 of QIF score. These items are listed by EVA.

3 and 6 months
Effectiveness on fatigue measured by items 4 to 10 of QIF score
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months

To assess the continuing effects at 3 and 6 months and the impact on fatigue The effectiveness of haptic massage will be evaluated in the same manner as the main objective.

The effectiveness of haptic massage on fatigue will be evaluated through the individual analysis of the items 4 to 10 of QIF score. These items are listed by EVA.

3 and 6 months
Effectiveness on anxiety measured by items 4 to 10 of QIF score
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months

To assess the continuing effects at 3 and 6 months and the impact on anxiety The effectiveness of haptic massage will be evaluated in the same manner as the main objective.

The effectiveness of haptic massage on anxiety will be evaluated through the individual analysis of the items 4 to 10 of QIF score. These items are listed by EVA.

3 and 6 months
Effectiveness on stiffness measured by items 4 to 10 of QIF score
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months

To assess the continuing effects at 3 and 6 months and the impact on stiffness The effectiveness of haptic massage will be evaluated in the same manner as the main objective.

The effectiveness of haptic massage on stiffness will be evaluated through the individual analysis of the items 4 to 10 of QIF score. These items are listed by EVA.

3 and 6 months
Effectiveness on depression measured by items 4 to 10 of QIF score
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months

To assess the continuing effects at 3 and 6 months and the impact on depression The effectiveness of haptic massage will be evaluated in the same manner as the main objective.

The effectiveness of haptic massage on depression will be evaluated through the individual analysis of the items 4 to 10 of QIF score. These items are listed by EVA.

3 and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Stéphane SWEERTVAEGHER, Director, CHU of the Nice

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 19, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fibromyalgia

Clinical Trials on Massage

Subscribe