Objective Markers of Pain Perception in Humans

Objective Markers of Pain Perception in Humans: a Study in Healthy Subjects

Determine objective markers of pain perception remains a major scientific and medical issue. Various tools have been proposed to objectify pain, but their adaptability to different clinical contexts are limited. Our working hypothesis considers that the research for markers of immediate pain perception should be based on an electrophysiological approach, based on the combined analysis of EEG and autonomic responses.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This project aims to study the cortical and autonomic responses induced by tonic painful stimulation compared to those induced by comparable sensory and stressful stimulations, by combining high density EEG, cutaneous sympathetic, cardiovascular and pupillary recordings.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lyon, France, 69500
        • Hospices Civils de Lyon
      • Saint-etienne, France, 42000
        • CHU DE SAINT-ETIENNE

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Affiliate or beneficiary of social security
  • Signature of consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of cardiovascular disease (vagal syncope, hypertension, etc ...), renal, metabolic (diabetes ...), psychiatric (depression, etc ...) or neurological (seizure, etc ...) syndromes;
  • Reynaud's syndrome;
  • Raynaud's disease;
  • Acrocyanosis;
  • Known rhythm disorders;
  • Participation at the same time in another clinical trial;
  • Taking a medical treatment;
  • Suffering from acute (complaint of pain in the week before the test) or chronic pain,
  • Allergic to conductive gel for electrodes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: EEG responses
The study compares electroencephalographical responses (EEG) to painful stimuli tonic to those evoked by non-painful stimuli and with or without virtual reality

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EEG Gamma power.
Time Frame: Baseline
The EGG signals are compared between a painful stimuli tonic to those evoked by non-painful stimuli.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ratio of low to high frequency spectral powers
Time Frame: Baseline
The low and high frequency spectral powers are measured by an ECG Holter. The ratio are compared between a painful stimuli tonic to those evoked by non-painful stimuli.
Baseline
Magnitude of the sympathetic cutaneous reactivity
Time Frame: Baseline

The sympathetic cutaneous reactivity is measured by an acquisition system (ME6000, MEDIMEX, France) with one electrode on the hand.

The magnitudes are compared between a painful stimuli tonic to those evoked by non-painful stimuli.

Baseline
Amplitude of pupillary dilation
Time Frame: Baseline
The pupillary dilation is measured by the ISCAN® system (MA, USA). The amplitudes are compared between a painful stimuli tonic to those evoked by non-painful stimuli.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 4, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 24, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 25, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1308172
  • 2013-A01636-39 (Other Identifier: ANSM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Painful tonic stimuli

3
Subscribe