Pre-operative Ketorolac Administration Has no Pre-emptive Analgesic Effect Following Total Abdominal Hysterectomy

January 1, 2016 updated by: Beatriz Nistal-Nuno, Hospital Arquitecto Marcide

Background: Experimental models using short duration noxious stimuli have led to the concept of pre-emptive analgesia. Ketorolac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), has been shown to have a post-operative narcotic sparing effect when given pre-operatively and alternatively to not have this effect. This study was undertaken to determine whether a single intravenous dose of ketorolac would result in decreased post-operative pain and narcotic requirements.

Methods: In a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 48 women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy were studied. Patients in the ketorolac group received 30 mg of intravenous ketorolac 30 minutes before surgical incision, while the control group received normal saline. The post-operative analgesia was performed with a continuous infusion of tramadol at 12 mg/hour with the possibility of a 10 mg bolus every 10 minutes. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), tramadol consumption and hemodynamic parameters at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-operatively. We quantified times to rescue analgesic (morphine), adverse effects and patient satisfaction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Damage to tissues has been shown to provoke a magnified reaction to noxious stimuli, peripherally by diminishing the threshold of nociceptive afferent nerve terminals and centrally by augmenting the excitability of second-order sensory neurons in the spinal cord; later resulting in an amplification and extension of postoperative pain after surgery. Hence, much research has focused on procedures to avoid these central neuroplastic changes through the usage of preemptive analgesia.

Experimental models have conducted to the idea of 'preemptive analgesia' . The decrement of afferent nociceptive inputs to the spinal cord using analgesic techniques started before the initial painful stimulus avoids or attenuates the formation of spinal hyperexcitabilty and avoids the transformed processing of afferent input, leading to less postoperative pain. Whether such experimental models are applicable to the noxious circumstances occurring during surgery is controversial.

Although preemptive analgesia with different agents have been successful in experimental animals, conclusions from human studies remain in conflict. A diversity of agents have been analyzed for their conceivable preemptive analgesic effects: local anesthetics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), paracetamol, opioids, magnesium, cytokine synthesis inhibitors, ketamine, and tricyclic antidepressants.

Scientific research enabling an understanding of the molecular mechanisms of nociception has disclosed a considerable function of cytokines and prostaglandins (PG). Hyperexcitability also appears peripherally in nerve endings at the location of surgical tissue damage and is mediated in part by prostaglandins. Evidence is accumulating that products of the cyclooxygenase pathway may be engaged in the elaboration of central sensitization. Drugs that block the formation of prostaglandins such as NSAIDs might therefore be assumed to avoid or minimize the formation of this peripheral and central hyperexcitability. Their central analgesic actions are effected by averting spinal prostaglandin synthesis and attenuating liberation of neurotransmitters from the primary afferent terminals and spinal interneurons.

Sporadic studies have established some considerable preemptive benefit of NSAIDs. As a result, the objective of this study was to ascertain the impact of a NSAID, ketorolac, on pain severity and analgesic requirement, in the early postoperative period.

Ketorolac is a nonselective NSAID that blocks cyclooxygenase 1 (COX-1) and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) enzymes and as a result blocks the formation of prostaglandins attenuating the sensitization procedures. The antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory action of NSAIDs may be associated to the suppression of nitric oxide synthase activation, decreased generation of proinflammatory cytokines, and lipoxine activation. Consequently, this multidirectional activity indicates that there may be the probability of adjusting the nociception process by the employment of these drugs perioperatively.

To our knowledge, no prior controlled study has determined the effectiveness of preoperative intravenous ketorolac compared to placebo in patients who underwent abdominal hysterectomies. Thus, this clinical trial was conceived to explore the postoperative analgesic efficiency and opioid-sparing action of a single dose of intravenous ketorolac in contrast with placebo administered preoperatively.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • A Coruña
      • Ferrol, A Coruña, Spain, 15405
        • Complexo Hospitalario Arquitecto Marcide-Prof. Novoa Santos
    • Oxfordshire
      • Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, OX3 9DU
        • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • normal height and weight
  • ASA class I, II, III
  • elective surgery
  • surgery time between 30-150 min
  • understanding of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
  • no allergies or intolerance to NSAIDs or anesthetics
  • no psychiatric illness.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • renal deterioration
  • history of peptic ulceration
  • asthma
  • coagulopathy
  • cognitive impairment
  • inability to use the Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) device
  • history of chronic pain syndromes
  • history of chronic use of analgesics, sedatives, opioids or steroids
  • liver or hematologic disease
  • a history of drug or alcohol abuse
  • therapy with NSAIDs, anticoagulants, or lithium.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
In the operating room, the anesthesiologist administered 50 mL of 0.9% saline intravenously to patients in the control group 30 minutes before surgical incision
In the operating room, the anesthesiologist administered 50 mL of 0.9 % saline intravenously to patients in the control group 30 minutes before surgical incision
Experimental: Ketorolac Tromethamine
In the operating room, the anesthesiologist administered ketorolac (30 mg) in 50 mL of 0.9 % saline intravenously to patients in the ketorolac group 30 minutes before surgical incision. (a single dose).
In the operating room, the anesthesiologist administered ketorolac (30 mg) in 50 mL of 0.9 % saline intravenously to patients in the ketorolac group 30 minutes before surgical incision (a single dose).
Other Names:
  • ketorolac

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: at 0 hours postoperatively (arrival at recovery room)
The VAS represents a scale with the lowest value as 0 (no pain) and the highest value as 10 (worst imaginable pain).
at 0 hours postoperatively (arrival at recovery room)
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: at 1 hour postoperatively
The VAS represents a scale with the lowest value as 0 (no pain) and the highest value as 10 (worst imaginable pain).
at 1 hour postoperatively
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: at 2 hours postoperatively
The VAS represents a scale with the lowest value as 0 (no pain) and the highest value as 10 (worst imaginable pain).
at 2 hours postoperatively
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: at 4 hours postoperatively
The VAS represents a scale with the lowest value as 0 (no pain) and the highest value as 10 (worst imaginable pain).
at 4 hours postoperatively
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: at 8 hours postoperatively
The VAS represents a scale with the lowest value as 0 (no pain) and the highest value as 10 (worst imaginable pain).
at 8 hours postoperatively
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: at 12 hours postoperatively
The VAS represents a scale with the lowest value as 0 (no pain) and the highest value as 10 (worst imaginable pain).
at 12 hours postoperatively
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: at 16 hours postoperatively
The VAS represents a scale with the lowest value as 0 (no pain) and the highest value as 10 (worst imaginable pain).
at 16 hours postoperatively
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: at 24 hours postoperatively
The VAS represents a scale with the lowest value as 0 (no pain) and the highest value as 10 (worst imaginable pain).
at 24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
tramadol consumption
Time Frame: at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively
The cumulative amounts of tramadol (mg) administered through the Patient-Controlled-Analgesia (PCA) device as a basal infusion and the incremental supplemental bolus required by the patient were documented at these time points.
at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood Pressure (BP) systolic
Time Frame: at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively
Measured in mm Hg. We evaluated these hemodynamic parameters as an indirect measure of pain.
at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively
Blood Pressure (BP) diastolic
Time Frame: at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively
Measured in mm Hg. We evaluated these hemodynamic parameters as an indirect measure of pain
at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively
Time for the first demand of analgesia
Time Frame: 24 h postoperatively.
The time interval to first solicited rescue analgesia in the 24 h postoperatively (in minutes). This rescue analgesia was administered if the established analgesic treatment was not sufficient to alleviate pain.
24 h postoperatively.
Number of rescue doses
Time Frame: 24 h postoperatively
The number of times a rescue analgesic dose was administered as a supplement in the first postoperative 24 hours.
24 h postoperatively
Satisfaction score
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Global patient satisfaction (0-3), regarding pain control, was measured 24 hours after the operation
24 hours postoperatively
Side effects
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Number of Participants with Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events in the 24 hours postoperatively
24 hours postoperatively
Heart rate
Time Frame: at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively
We evaluated these hemodynamic parameters as an indirect measure of pain
at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively
Respiratory rate
Time Frame: at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively
We evaluated these hemodynamic parameters as an indirect measure of pain.
at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Beatriz Nistal-Nuño, MD, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2001

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2001

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2001

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 25, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 30, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 1, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe