Comparative Effectiveness of Decision Support Strategies for Joint Replacement Surgery

December 12, 2019 updated by: Karen Sepucha, Massachusetts General Hospital

Comparative Effectiveness of Decision Support Strategies for Joint Replacement Surgery: A Factorial Randomized Trial

This study is a 2X2 factorial randomized trial that will the examine the comparative effectiveness of two patient decision aids for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) as well as the impact of a surgeon-focused intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a 2X2 factorial randomized trial that will examine the comparative effectiveness of different decision support strategies for patients making treatment decisions about hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA). Eligible patient subjects will be randomly assigned to receive one of two decision aids before their upcoming clinic visit with a participating orthopedic specialist. Participating providers are randomly assigned to either usual care or an intervention (a report that includes patients' goals and treatment preferences). Patient participants will complete three surveys at different time points: before their orthopedic visit, one week after the clinic visit, and 12 months later. Providers will complete a short survey for a subset of patient participants. The study is titled the DECIDE-OA study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1220

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02120
        • New England Baptist Hospital
      • Newton, Massachusetts, United States, 02462
        • Newton Wellesley Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of either hip or knee osteoarthritis
  • Scheduled visit with participating orthopedic surgeon

Exclusion Criteria:

  • prior partial or total knee or hip joint replacement within last 5 years
  • hip fracture or asceptic necrosis (AVN) in last 12 months
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Psoriatic arthritis
  • Unable to read English or Spanish
  • Unable to consent for self due to cognitive or medical issue
  • Hip or knee decision aid provided by Partners Healthcare clinician within 12 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: FACTORIAL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Interactive Decision Aid and Usual Care
Group receiving brief interactive decision aid and being seen by a provider assigned to usual care. The decision aids are the Shared Decision Points for hip and knee osteoarthritis from Healthwise.
The Healthwise Shared Decision Points in booklet version for hip and knee osteoarthritis
EXPERIMENTAL: Video decision aid and usual care
Group receiving long video decision aids and being seen by a provider assigned to usual care. The decision aids are the DVD and Booklets for hip and knee osteoarthritis from Health Dialog.
Health Dialog DVD and booklet decision aids for hip and knee osteoarthritis
EXPERIMENTAL: Interactive Decision Aid and Provider Report
Group receiving brief interactive decision aid and being seen by a provider assigned to intervention arm. The decision aids are the Shared Decision Points for hip and knee osteoarthritis from Healthwise. The provider intervention is a report that includes the patients' goals and treatment preferences.
The Healthwise Shared Decision Points in booklet version for hip and knee osteoarthritis
A short report that includes the patients' goals and treatment preferences
EXPERIMENTAL: Video decision aid and Provider report
Group receiving long video decision aids and being seen by a provider assigned to intervention arm. The decision aids are the hip or knee DVD and Booklets for hip and knee osteoarthritis from Health Dialog. The intervention is a report that includes the patients' goals and treatment preferences.
The Healthwise Shared Decision Points in booklet version for hip and knee osteoarthritis
A short report that includes the patients' goals and treatment preferences

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients Knowledge
Time Frame: before orthopedic visit
Knowledge sub-score generated from responses to the Hip or Knee Decision Quality Instrument (DQI). Scores range from 0-100%, with higher score meaning higher knowledge.
before orthopedic visit
Percentage of Patients Who Received Preferred Treatment
Time Frame: 1 week after visit with orthopedic surgeon
Patient preferred treatment item from the Hip or Knee Decision Quality Instrument will be compared with the treatment received to determine percentage of patients who received treatment that matched their preferences.
1 week after visit with orthopedic surgeon

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Used the Decision Aid
Time Frame: before orthopedic visit
1 item asking patients how much they reviewed the program (none, some, most, all). The percentage who report viewing most or all will be calculated.
before orthopedic visit
Change in Quality of Life
Time Frame: before orthopedic visit; 12 months from date of orthopedic visit
Overall quality of life (EQ-5D) scores will be calculated and the impact of decision support strategies on change in quality of life will be examined. Scale ranges from -0.11 to 1.00, with higher (positive) values meaning better overall health. The minimum important change is 0.10 points.
before orthopedic visit; 12 months from date of orthopedic visit
Surgical Rates
Time Frame: 6 months after the initial visit
Medical chart review and patient report of whether or not surgery was used in the 6 months after the visit.
6 months after the initial visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

A complete, cleaned, de-identified copy of the final data set that includes survey data for the primary and secondary outcomes from patient participants has been created. The PI will share a de-identified data set with outside investigators at no cost, according to approved Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) policies for data sharing. Investigators from other sites are able to request the data and will be required to complete a data use agreement that ensures that all local Institutional Review Board requirements are met before using the data, that they will not attempt to identify any data in the dataset, and that they will not share the data set with anyone outside their project team, etc.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be available September 2019 and will be available for at least 7 years from that time.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Interested investigators may consult the DECIDE-OA study page on the Massachusetts General Hospital's Health Decision Sciences Center website for information about data sharing.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Study Data/Documents

  1. outcome measure
    Information comments: Hip Osteoarthritis Decision Quality Instrument
  2. outcome measure
    Information comments: Knee Osteoarthritis Decision Quality Instrument

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Interactive decision aid

Subscribe