Effectiveness of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Using Glass Ionomer Cement of Different Costs (SLM1797)

November 6, 2017 updated by: Jose Carlos P Imparato, Faculty Sao Leopoldo Mandic Campinas

Effectiveness of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Using Glass Ionomer Cement of Different Costs: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) is an alternative restorative technique for dental caries, applying the partial caries tissue removal philosophy using hand instruments, relative cotton rolls isolation, immediate restoration with Glass Ionomer Cements (GIC) and avoiding local anesthesia. The chosen material for this study will be the High Viscosity Glass Ionomer Cement (HVGIC) due to its unique physical-chemical properties as well as its applicability in challenging clinical situations where other materials would not be adequate. Although there are substantial evidences regarding GIC properties, information about GIC (with different costs) longevity is still weak. Therefore, the objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of ART restorations performed with low-cost HVGIC in cavitated dentine carious lesions in primary and permanent molars. This will be a multicenter randomized controlled double-blind (patient and operator) clinical trial performed with 680 primary and/or permanent molars in children between 4 and 9 years old presenting cavitated dentine carious lesions in occlusal and occlusal-proximal surfaces. The tooth will be considered as the unit sample, which will be randomly allocated to the groups through a generated random list numbers and distributed in dark sealed envelopes opened only by dental assistants. Teeth in the test group will be submitted to restorative treatment with HVGIC Vitro Molar and those in the control group with HVGIC Fuji IX. The restoration effectiveness will be assessed by means of both clinical and bitewing x-rays control after 6 and 12 months.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

574

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sao Paulo
      • Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 13045755
        • Faculty Sao Leopoldo Mandic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 9 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children with at least one primary and/or permanent molar with dentine carious lesion in the occlusal and/or occlusal-proximal surface.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Special need patients, subjects under orthodontic treatment and/or systemically compromised.
  • Teeth with restorations, sealants, developmental defects, deep carious lesions with pulpal exposure risk, fistula and/or abscess, and those with history of spontaneous pain.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: High Cost
Restoration using a high-cost glass ionomer cement.
Surfaces allocated to this group will be treated with a high-cost glass ionomer cement restoration (Fuji IX, GC America, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Experimental: Low Cost
Restoration using a low-cost glass ionomer cement.
Surfaces allocated to this group will be treated with a low-cost glass ionomer cement restoration (Maxxion R, FGM, BRA), according to the manufacturer's instructions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Restoration survival
Time Frame: 12 months
The restoration will be classified according to the scores described by Frencken et al. (1994) and Roeleveld et al. (2006).
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: Through study completion (12 months)
The costs of each treatment procedure will be calculated and compared with thresholds values for intervention cost-effectiveness by region, determined by World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/choice/costs/CER_levels/en/).
Through study completion (12 months)
Impact on children's quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
The oral health related quality of life will be measured using a validated questionnaire according to the children's age. The "Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale" (ECOHIS) (Tesch et al., 2008) will be applied with 4-5 years old children. The "Child Perceptions Questionnaire" (CPQ) will be used for 6-9 years old children (Martins et al., 2009). They will be applied immediately before the procedure and on 12 months follow-up.
Baseline and 12 months
Children self-reported discomfort
Time Frame: Baseline
The discomfort of each treatment will be evaluated using the facial scale of Wong-Baker (Wong, Baker, 1988). The patient will be asked to choose the face that is more similar to how he/she felt during the treatment. The answer should be given solely by the child, which means no parental or professional interferences.
Baseline
Caries lesions progression
Time Frame: Every 6 months up to 12 months
The treatments will be evaluated radiographically. This evaluation will be performed by two blinded examiners, which will evaluate the four patients' radiographies (baseline, after treatment, 6 months, 12 months) independently, two by two, without knowing the chronological order of them. The efficacy of the treatment will be related to the presence or absence of increasing radiolucent area. They will also classify each radiography using Ekstrand criteria (Ekstrand et al., 1997) and analyze them in a software (ImageJ 1.49, National Institute of Health, USA) in order to make the radiographic subtraction.
Every 6 months up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jose Carlos P Imparato, PhD, Faculty Sao Leopoldo Mandic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 20, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Caries

Clinical Trials on High Cost

3
Subscribe