Reliability of Waveform Analysis as an Adjunct to Loss of Resistance for Obstetrical Epidural Blocks

In this study, we will set out to confirm the reliability of epidural waveform analysis (EWA) as an adjunct to loss of resistance for obstetrical epidural blocks.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

After loss of resistance, 5 mL of normal saline will be injected through the epidural needle; the latter will then be connected to a pressure transducer (leveled with the heart) using a rigid tubing. A pressure recording of the epidural waveform will be saved for future assessment by a blinded observer.

After the recording of the waveform, the rigid tubing will be disconnected from the epidural needle. A 4 mL bolus of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 5 µg/mL will be injected through the latter. An epidural catheter will be advanced 3-4 cm past the tip of the needle inside the epidural space. The needle will then be removed and the catheter secured to the skin in the usual fashion.

Fifteen minutes after the injection of the local anesthetic bolus, a blinded observer will apply ice to the T1-L5 dermatomes and assess the epidural block.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4A 3J1
        • Royal Victoria Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

-American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 1-3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • adults who are unable to give their own consent
  • coagulopathy (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up ie platelets ≤ 100, International Normalized Ratio ≥ 1.4 or prothrombin time ≥ 50)
  • renal failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up ie creatinine ≥ 100)
  • hepatic failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up ie transaminases ≥ 100)
  • allergy to local anesthetic
  • prior surgery in the lumbar spine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Obstetrical patients
Obstetrical patients requiring epidural analgesia for delivery
Epidural waveform analysis as a confirmation of loss of Resistance

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success rate
Time Frame: 15 minutes
Success rate evaluated with sensory block to ice
15 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Epidural waveform analysis
Time Frame: Immediately after epidural catheter insertion
presence or absence of an epidural waveform measured through the epidural catheter right after insertion
Immediately after epidural catheter insertion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Albert Moore, MD, FRCPC, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 8, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MUHC-JGH

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy

Clinical Trials on Obstetrical patients

Subscribe