Use of an Occlusal Support Device During the Second Stage of Labor

August 25, 2022 updated by: University of Minnesota
The primary objectives of this study are to determine if the use of an Occlusal Support Device (OSD)(Mouthguard) can reduce the duration and intensity of the second stage of labor, reduce the incidence of labor complications including Caesarian Sections and improve Apgar scores in newborns

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Prolonged labor, especially during the second stage of active expulsive effort (the pushing phase), is associated with increased risk of maternal complications (e.g. tissue trauma, postpartum hemorrhage, intra-amniotic infection). Developing an effective method to assist and maximize maternal expulsion effort should be of great value in reducing the number of complications, also including cesarean section or instrumental deliveries. Past studies published in the dental literature have shown that specially designed oral appliances that support the dental occlusion may increase the isometric strength of different muscle groups. Increased strength of the neck muscles could improve efficiency of the Valsalva maneuver in increasing intra-uterine pressure, and thus decreasing the duration of phase II of labor. Nulliparous women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy will be randomly assigned to either the study group (Dental appliance) or the no dental appliance group. Duration of labor will be measured for both phase I and phase II. Rates for cesarean section and instrument deliveries and other complications will be charted as well as Apgar scores .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

347

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Nulliparous women
  • Uncomplicated pregnancy
  • Singleton pregnancy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide informed consent or comply with study protocol,
  • High risk and/or complicated pregnancy,
  • Have multiple fetuses as diagnosed by ultrasound,
  • Have extensive decay or multiple broken/missing teeth that will interfere with the fabrication of an OSD

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Occlusal Support Device
Support device for women in labor
Bite plate
Placebo Comparator: Control
No device given for women in labor
Control group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stage 2 Duration of Labor
Time Frame: Duration of labor
Determine if an Occlusal Support Device (OSD) can reduce the duration of the second stage of labor
Duration of labor
Number of Participants With a Cesarian Section
Time Frame: Baseline
Determine if an OSD can reduce the incidence of labor complications including Caesarian Sections
Baseline
Average Apgar Score
Time Frame: at minute 1 and minute 5

Determine if the use of an OSD can improve Apgar scores in newborns. The Apgar test is done by a doctor, midwife, or nurse. The provider examines the baby's:

Breathing effort Heart rate Muscle tone Reflexes Skin color Each category is scored with 0, 1, or 2, depending on the observed condition. Higher scores are better. Scores are added for a total ranging from 0-10.

at minute 1 and minute 5

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James E Gambucci, DDS, University of Minnesota

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 26, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

March 26, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy

Clinical Trials on Occlusal Support Device

Subscribe