- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02902419
The Effect of Timing of Removal of Wound Dressing on Surgical Site Infection Rate After Cesarean Delivery
September 14, 2016 updated by: Peter R Cole, MD, Albany Medical College
A randomized controlled trial measuring surgical site infection rate as a function of timing of wound dressing removal.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A randomized controlled trial with a sample size of 602 patients to study the effect of timing of wound dressing removal on the surgical site infection rate.
300 patients were randomized to a group that had the wound dressing removed between 12-30 hours postoperatively.
302 patients were randomized to a group that had the wound dressing removal between 30-48 hours postoperatively.
Statistical analyses were performed to determine if the timing of dressing removal had statistical significance on the surgical site infection rate, the primary outcome.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
602
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Albany, New York, United States, 12208
- St. Peter's Hospital
-
Niskayuna, New York, United States, 12309
- Bellevue Women's Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 50 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients ages 18-50 years;
- medically competent (no proxies or prisoners); and
- multifetal and singleton gestations from 23 0/7 weeks to 42 0/7 weeks gestational age.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to obtain informed consent;
- fetal death;
- immunocompromised patients; patients taking immuno-suppressants; history of documented surgical site infection; or patients requiring reoperation within the 6 week postoperative period for indications other than wound dehiscence/debridement/infection.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 1
Wound dressing removal was performed between 12-30 hours postoperatively.
|
|
|
Active Comparator: 2
Wound dressing removal was performed between 30-48 hours postoperatively.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical Site infection Rate
Time Frame: 6 weeks postoperatively
|
Cellulitis, purulent drainage, abscess or wound requiring drainage, debridement, and antibiotics associated with a clinical diagnosis of infection.
Any disruption of fascia or subcutaneous skin.
|
6 weeks postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Peter R Cole, MD, Albany Medical College
- Study Chair: Kevin C Kiley, MD, Albany Medical College
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Olsen MA, Butler AM, Willers DM, Devkota P, Gross GA, Fraser VJ. Risk factors for surgical site infection after low transverse cesarean section. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;29(6):477-84; discussion 485-6. doi: 10.1086/587810.
- Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJ, Kirmeyer S, Mathews TJ, Wilson EC. Births: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011 Nov 3;60(1):1-70.
- Tuuli MG, Rampersad RM, Carbone JF, Stamilio D, Macones GA, Odibo AO. Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;117(3):682-690. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820ad61e. Erratum In: Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;117(6):1440.
- van Ramshorst GH, Nieuwenhuizen J, Hop WC, Arends P, Boom J, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model. World J Surg. 2010 Jan;34(1):20-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0277-y.
- Anderson DJ, Podgorny K, Berrios-Torres SI, Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Greene L, Nyquist AC, Saiman L, Yokoe DS, Maragakis LL, Kaye KS. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;35(6):605-27. doi: 10.1086/676022.
- Owen J, Andrews WW. Wound complications after cesarean sections. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Dec;37(4):842-55. doi: 10.1097/00003081-199412000-00009. No abstract available.
- Chen WY, Rogers AA, Lydon MJ. Characterization of biologic properties of wound fluid collected during early stages of wound healing. J Invest Dermatol. 1992 Nov;99(5):559-64. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12667378.
- Consensus paper on the surveillance of surgical wound infections. The Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America; The Association for Practitioners in Infection Control; The Centers for Disease Control; The Surgical Infection Society. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;13(10):599-605.
- Figueroa D, Jauk VC, Szychowski JM, Garner R, Biggio JR, Andrews WW, Hauth J, Tita AT. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):33-8. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31827a072c. Erratum In: Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May;121(5):1113.
- Poulsen KB, Bremmelgaard A, Sorensen AI, Raahave D, Petersen JV. Estimated costs of postoperative wound infections. A case-control study of marginal hospital and social security costs. Epidemiol Infect. 1994 Oct;113(2):283-95. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800051712.
- Pavlidis TE, Galatianos IN, Papaziogas BT, Lazaridis CN, Atmatzidis KS, Makris JG, Papaziogas TB. Complete dehiscence of the abdominal wound and incriminating factors. Eur J Surg. 2001 May;167(5):351-4; discussion 355. doi: 10.1080/110241501750215221.
- Ovington LG. Hanging wet-to-dry dressings out to dry. Home Healthc Nurse. 2001 Aug;19(8):477-83; quiz 484. doi: 10.1097/00004045-200108000-00007.
- Toon CD, Ramamoorthy R, Davidson BR, Gurusamy KS. Early versus delayed dressing removal after primary closure of clean and clean-contaminated surgical wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 5;(9):CD010259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010259.pub2.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2012
Study Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2012
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 14, 2016
First Posted (Estimate)
September 15, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
September 15, 2016
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 14, 2016
Last Verified
September 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AlbanyMC2984
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Surgical Site Infection
-
Gundersen Lutheran Medical FoundationGundersen Lutheran Health SystemCompletedSurgical Site Infection | Superficial Surgical Site Infection | Deep Surgical Site Infection | Organ/Space Surgical Site InfectionUnited States
-
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research CenterEnrolling by invitationSurgical Site Infections | Surgical Site Infection After Major SurgerySaudi Arabia
-
Singapore General HospitalNovem Healthcare Pte LtdTerminatedSuperficial Surgical Site InfectionSingapore
-
Halmstad County HospitalCompleted
-
MinaPharm PharmaceuticalsRecruitingSurgical Site InfectionsEgypt
-
Karolinska University HospitalStockholm South General HospitalRecruitingPostoperative Surgical Site InfectionSweden
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompleted
-
Region SkaneVinnovaCompleted
-
Population Health Research InstituteCompletedSurgical Site InfectionsCanada
-
University of RochesterSage Products, Inc.Completed
Clinical Trials on Wound dressing removal.
-
Hospital KemamanCompletedSurgical Wound | Cesarean Section Complications | Surgical Wound InfectionMalaysia
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...CompletedPain From Free Gingival GraftUnited States
-
UPM BiomedicalsUniversity of HelsinkiCompleted
-
Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong KongUnknownSurgical Site InfectionHong Kong
-
University of MiamiCompleted
-
The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonEtlik Zubeyde Hanım Women's Health Care, Training and Research Hospital; Dicle...CompletedAbdominal Wall WoundUnited States, Turkey
-
ETS Wound Care, LLCProfessional Education and Research InstituteCompletedDiabetic Foot | Diabetic Foot Ulcer | Ulcer FootUnited States
-
Vomaris InnovationsCompletedBurns | Wound HealingUnited States
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkCompletedWound Healing | Patient ComfortDenmark
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinUniversity of LuebeckRecruitingSecond-degree Burn | Third-Degree BurnGermany