- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00975377
Clipping Versus No Hair Removal and the Risk of Surgical Site Infections
Clipping vs. No Hair Removal and the Risk of Surgical Site Infection: A Randomized, Assessor Blinded Non-inferiority Clinical Trial Among Patients Undergoing General Surgical Procedures at a Community Hospital
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Public health organizations, third party payers, consumer watchdog groups, health care quality organizations, and patients are increasingly scrutinizing patient safety in hospitals. Surgical site infection (SSI) rates are one of the key quality measures by which hospitals are evaluated. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines provide specific recommendations, weighted by evidence, to prevent SSI. These include the following category 1A recommendations (Strongly recommended for implementation and supported by well-designed experimental, clinical, or epidemiological studies).
- Do not remove hair preoperatively unless the hair at or around the incision site will interfere with the operation
- If hair is removed, remove immediately before the operation, preferably with electric clippers.
However, a recent systematic review of randomized clinical trials concluded there was no difference in SSI among patients that had hair removed prior to surgery and those that did not. Furthermore, trials involving hair removal were largely underpowered and of marginal quality. If hair is going to be removed, previous studies have shown hair removal with clippers or depilatory creams to result in fewer SSI than shaving with a razor. However, the need for trials comparing SSI rates with and without hair removal was stressed in the recent systematic review. No prospective, randomized clinical trial evaluating no hair removal vs. hair removal by clipping, the two hair removing modalities preferred by CDC SSI prevention guidelines, has ever been reported. This study aims to assess whether hair removal via clipping is non-inferior to no hair removal in a cohort of patients undergoing general surgical procedures at a community hospital.
A non-inferiority study design will be used based upon the following rationale. CDC guidelines recommend not removing hair preoperatively unless the hair will interfere with the operation. However, there is no published evidence that clipping hair results in more SSI than no hair removal. Clipping hair is often preferred from a surgical perspective. This may be because of historical practice patterns, personal comfort level, and the either real or perceived interference of unremoved hair with performing the operation. Therefore, assessing whether clipping is non-inferior to no hair removal will provide helpful information regarding the appropriateness of the current CDC recommendation to not remove hair preoperatively unless the hair will interfere with the operation.
Patients will be assessed for enrollment after a decision has been made for elective (non-emergent) operative intervention. Patients will undergo our institution's current preoperative procedural standard of care. Patients will be specifically instructed to not shave themselves prior to the procedure. The day of the procedure patients will undergo our institution's standard preoperative skin preparation, which currently includes povidone based skin antiseptic. Preoperative antibiotics will be administered according to our institutional standards of care for their particular operation.
Randomization will be assigned the day of surgery in the preoperative area. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to either undergo clipping or no hair removal. Enrolled patients will then undergo the type of hair removal appropriate for their study arm. Clipping patients will undergo hair removal on the day of surgery by a member of the preoperative nursing staff, immediately prior to the scheduled operation. Any patient that undergoes unanticipated hair removal, (either additional hair removal in patients that were clipped or any hair removal in patients that were not clipped) will be noted as a protocol deviation and the event recorded. Patients will undergo their surgical procedure according to standard surgical care.
Patients will be scheduled for a follow-up wound assessment with a trained study nurse. This assessment will take place by an independent assessor whom is blinded (as best able given study interventions) to the study group the patient was in.
Additionally, if patients are seen for wound problems by their surgeon, primary physicians, or other physicians we will attempt to have them evaluated by one of the trained nurses at that visit as well. If patients do not keep their follow-up appointment, they will be called and asked a standardized set of questions related to the wound. Finally, in the event patients are seen for wound problems at other facilities, or in other departments (i.e. urgent care, emergency room, etc), they will be encouraged to make a follow-up appointment within a few days to be reassessed, at which time the study nurse can assess their status as well. The patients' electronic medical records will be updated to reflect their study involvement, and to alert providers to contact the study coordinator with wound related questions if seen in another department.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Wisconsin
-
La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States, 54601
- Gundersen Lutheran Health System
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older
- Patients undergoing a general surgical procedure (inpatient or ambulatory)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Less than 18 years of age
- Systemic antibiotics within 1 week of surgery
- Toe amputations
- Ano-rectal surgery
- Vascular surgery
- Patients that have no need for hair to be removed for the operation
- Inability to provide consent
- Anticipated inability to keep 14 day follow-up appointment
- Emergent surgical procedure
- Patients remove their own hair prior to the operative day
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: No hair removal
Patients randomized to the no hair removal cohort will not undergo any preoperative hair removal.
|
|
Active Comparator: Hair clipping
Patients in the clipping cohort undergo hair removal at the surgical site.
Hair removal will occur on the day of surgery immediately prior to the scheduled operation.
|
Patients randomized to the hair clipping cohort will be clipped using an Allegiance 4413 hair clipper.
Hair removal will occur on the day of surgery by one of the preoperative nursing staff, immediately prior to the scheduled operation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
To determine the proportion of patients without a surgical site infection (as defined by CDC criteria) at the postoperative assessment for patients who had hair clipped versus those with no hair removal preoperatively.
Time Frame: 14 (+/-7) days after surgery
|
14 (+/-7) days after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
To evaluate the unanticipated need for antibiotic or surgical intervention of the wound, as well as wound cultures obtained and their results.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
30 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Todd J. Kowalski, MD, Gundersen Lutheran Health System
- Principal Investigator: Shanu N. Kothari, MD, Gundersen Lutheran Health System
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. 1999 Apr;27(2):97-132; quiz 133-4; discussion 96.
- Tanner J, Woodings D, Moncaster K. Preoperative hair removal to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD004122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004122.pub3.
- Kowalski TJ, Kothari SN, Mathiason MA, Borgert AJ. Impact of Hair Removal on Surgical Site Infection Rates: A Prospective Randomized Noninferiority Trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Nov;223(5):704-711. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.03.032.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2-09-05-001
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Surgical Site Infection
-
MinaPharm PharmaceuticalsRecruitingSurgical Site InfectionsEgypt
-
Karolinska University HospitalStockholm South General HospitalRecruitingPostoperative Surgical Site InfectionSweden
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompleted
-
Region SkaneVinnovaCompleted
-
Population Health Research InstituteActive, not recruitingSurgical Site InfectionsCanada
-
University of RochesterSage Products, Inc.Completed
-
Singapore General HospitalNovem Healthcare Pte LtdTerminatedSuperficial Surgical Site InfectionSingapore
-
Halmstad County HospitalCompleted
-
Montefiore Medical CenterCompletedSurgical Site Infection Following Cesarean DeliveryUnited States
-
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories LimitedDuke Clinical Research InstituteCompletedSurgical Site InfectionsUnited States
Clinical Trials on Hair clipping
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloUnknownCerebral Aneurysm | Brain Aneurysm | Aneurysm, Middle Cerebral Artery | Aneurysm, Anterior Communicating Artery | Aneurysm, Posterior Communicating Artery | Aneurysm, Carotid ArteryBrazil
-
Montefiore Medical CenterThe Bee FoundationRecruitingAnxiety Depression | Mental Health Wellness 1 | Aneurysm CerebralUnited States
-
Medical University of ViennaJohannes Kepler University of LinzUnknown
-
Technische Universität DresdenZentrum für Klinische Studien Leipzig; University Medical Center Mainz; KKS DresdenRecruitingAortic Stenosis | Mitral RegurgitationGermany
-
University Hospital HeidelbergUnknownKidney TransplantationGermany
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNorthwestern University; University of Illinois at Chicago; Stony Brook University and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Nutraceutical Wellness Inc.Not yet recruitingHair ThinningUnited States
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalPeking University International HospitalRecruitingAneurysmal Subarachnoid HemorrhageChina
-
Nutraceutical Wellness Inc.Not yet recruitingHair ThinningUnited States