Potential Optimization Training in Simulation. (TOP)

August 19, 2018 updated by: Lilot Marc, Claude Bernard University

High Fidelity Simulation Performance After a Potential Optimization Training for Anesthesiologist Resident: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Simulated environment allowed safe learning of critical events and knowledge of appropriate response and treatment. Anesthesiology resident education curriculum in Lyon plans several high fidelity simulation session with a large panel of critical events. Anticipation of critical events before they may occur and planification of team resources and priority in the treatment strategy may help to improve team performance during the scenario. The investigators' goal is to compare individual and team performances with or without an optimization personal potential training.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The investigators aim to compare the individual and team performances for resident who were taught personal optimization skills (positive reinforcement, personalized psycho-physiological relaxation, mental rehearsal) and those who didn't.

The investigators are going to compare groups of anesthesiology residents going through same scenarios of simulated critical events in high fidelity simulation session. Scenarios will be recorded to be analyzed by 2 reviewers independently. A specific checklist of appropriate treatment and a non technical skill checklist will be use to cote team performance (OTTAWA and TEAM scales). Stress of the participants will be assessed by visual analogic scale of participants anxiety and stress. The two groups will be compare to see if improvement in team performance is associated with the intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

118

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
    • Rhône-Alpes
      • Lyon, Rhône-Alpes, France, 69007
        • CLESS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Anesthesiology and Intensive care resident in the simulation education curriculum

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate (written approval required)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Personal Optimization Training

Personal Optimization Training such as positive reinforcement, personalized psycho-physiological relaxation and mental rehearsal (total 5 hours a few weeks before the simulation).

Having 2 min to focus on techniques they were trained, after briefing of the scenario and before the start of the scenario.
Behavioral: Personal Optimization Training
No Intervention: Control

No particular training.

Screening of normal labs results during 2 min, after briefing of the scenario and before the start of the scenario.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance during simulation
Time Frame: day 1
Performance will be assessed by the sum of 3 assessment: Ottawa non technical skill scale, team scanle and specific technical skill scale Total will be a number from 0 to 100.
day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
visual analogic scale of anxiety
Time Frame: day 1
Visual analogic scales of anxiety
day 1
Visual analogic scales of confidence
Time Frame: day 1
Visual analogic scales of confidence
day 1

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
psychometric POMS scales
Time Frame: day 1
psychometric POMS scales
day 1
psychometric STAI scales
Time Frame: day 1
psychometric STAI scales
day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Claude Bernard University

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jean-Jacques, Lehot, PHD, CLESS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TOPCLESS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe