Evaluation of Internet-based Cognitive Behavioral Self-help Treatments for People With Psychosis (EviBaS)

May 8, 2019 updated by: University of Bern

Evaluation of Internet-based Cognitive Behavioral Self-help Treatments for Persecutory Ideation and Auditory Verbal Hallucinations

Schizophrenia is a severe mental disorder which is accompanied by an enormous individual and societal burden. Despite established efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp), its dissemination into routine mental health care remains poor. National regulations such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline in the United Kingdom recommend that CBTp should be offered to every person with psychotic symptoms, but more than 50% do not receive even a single session of CBTp. In Germany, CBTp is virtually not represented in the psychotherapy health service. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in a self-help format has been proven feasible and effective in anxiety and depressive disorders. Recently, Internet-based (self-help) interventions are also deployed via smartphone apps. The feasibility of Internet-based treatments for people with schizophrenia is well documented for Internet-based interventions (e.g., medication management) and also reported for smartphone interventions. However, there is a dearth of empirical studies precluding a conclusive picture. As far as the investigators know, there is only one study encompassing 90 participants with psychosis that investigated an Internet-based intervention with symptom-specific, cognitive behavioral interventions, which is from the investigators' research group. The unique features of the proposed project are 1) the first-time evaluation of a symptom-oriented, CBTp-based self-help treatment for people with psychotic symptoms via Internet, enhanced with smartphone assistance. The study is set up as randomized controlled trial (RCT) with active treatment versus a wait-list control group. It evaluates a combined Internet-based guided self-help treatment for persecutory ideation and auditory verbal hallucinations. The active treatment condition consists of access to a self-help website including regular written electronic contact with a guide and access to smartphone-based interactive worksheets (apps). The trials combine the low-threshold advantages of an online approach (e.g., anonymity) with the virtues of a clinical trial (e.g., symptom assessment and diagnostic verification via Interview). The primary outcome measure is the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Secondary outcome measures include self-reported symptom measures (Paranoia Checklist; Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire revised), completion rates, drop-out from the intervention, general symptomatology, side-effects, and client satisfaction. The project will help to answer the empirical question whether CBTp-based interventions in a purely Internet-based self-help format are effective. Positive findings would pave the way for an easy-to-access treatment option for patients with psychotic symptoms who currently are deprived of psychotherapeutic treatment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

101

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
      • Bern, Switzerland, 3012
        • University of Bern

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Electronic informed consent
  • Internet access
  • Adequate command of the German language
  • PANSS Suspiciousness/persecution >= 3 AND/OR PANSS hallucinations >=3
  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or delusional disorder
  • Concurrent psychopharmacological treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute suicidality
  • Acute risk of endangering others
  • No emergency plan (with is formulated during the telephone interview)
  • Disease of the central nervous system with need for treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Internet-based guided self-help
Internet-based, guided, CBT-oriented self-help treatment for persecutory ideation and auditory verbal hallucinations with access to a self-help website including regular written electronic contact with a guide and access to smartphone-based interactive worksheets (8 weeks)
The self-help program includes sessions regarding (1) cognitive model, (2) sleep hygiene, (3) mindfulness, (4) meta-cognition, (5) coping with voice hearing, (6) persecutory ideation, (7) worrying, (8) self-esteem, (9) depression, (10) social competence, and (11) relapse prevention.
No Intervention: Wait-List
Wait-list control group (8 weeks)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
Time Frame: Change in PANSS from pre-intervention to post-intervention (i.e. between 1 and 7 days after completion of the last module)
Kay et al. (1987); clinician administered
Change in PANSS from pre-intervention to post-intervention (i.e. between 1 and 7 days after completion of the last module)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Paranoia Checklist (PC)
Time Frame: Change in PC from pre-intervention to post-intervention (i.e. between 1 and 7 days after completion of the last module)
Freeman et al. (2005); self-report
Change in PC from pre-intervention to post-intervention (i.e. between 1 and 7 days after completion of the last module)
Launay-Slade Hallucination Scale (LSHS)
Time Frame: Change in LSHS from pre-intervention to post-intervention (i.e. between 1 and 7 days after completion of the last module)
Bentall & Slade (1985); self-report
Change in LSHS from pre-intervention to post-intervention (i.e. between 1 and 7 days after completion of the last module)
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Change in PHQ-9 from pre-intervention to post-intervention (i.e. between 1 and 7 days after completion of the last module)
Spitzer, Kroenke & Williams, 1999; self-report
Change in PHQ-9 from pre-intervention to post-intervention (i.e. between 1 and 7 days after completion of the last module)
Incongruence Scale (INK)
Time Frame: Change in INK from pre-intervention to post-intervention (i.e. between 1 and 7 days after completion of the last module)
Grosse Holtforth, Grawe & Tamcan (2004); self-report
Change in INK from pre-intervention to post-intervention (i.e. between 1 and 7 days after completion of the last module)
Quality of life (WHO-QOL)
Time Frame: Change in WHO-QOL from pre-intervention to post-intervention (i.e. between 1 and 7 days after completion of the last module)
WHO; self-report
Change in WHO-QOL from pre-intervention to post-intervention (i.e. between 1 and 7 days after completion of the last module)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Steffen Moritz, Prof. Dr., Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
  • Principal Investigator: Stefan Westermann, Dr, University of Bern

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 6, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 16, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 16, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe