A Comparison of Visualization Between Shamrock Technique and Paramedian Transverse Scan in Lumbar Plexus Blockade

December 1, 2016 updated by: Mahidol University
The primary objective of this study was to compare ultrasound visibility of the lumbar plexus at the intertransverse space between paramedian transverse scan and shamrock technique. Moreover obtaining a clear image of relevant structures is imperative. Thus, the secondary objective was to assess ultrasound visibility of each relevant structure and overall visibility between these two methods.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block (USG LPB) is regarded as a form of advanced ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (USGRA). One of the key challenges of USG LPB is visualization of the lumbar plexus. That are currently in use for ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus blockade - paramedian transverse scan (PMTS) and shamrock technique.

Method: Twenty-three healthy adult volunteers aged ≥ 18 years were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Ultrasound visualization results were compared between methods.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

23

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
        • Siriraj Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • healthy volunteer, age >/= 18

Exclusion Criteria:

  • spinal deformity and history of previous back or spine surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: shamrock
shamrock: both left and right sided scan,both intertransverse and transverse process window
This scanning technique is performed in the lateral decubitus position with the side of interest facing upwards. The transducer is placed in the transverse plane on the flank of the patient cranially to the iliac crest. The quadratus lumborum muscle is identified medial to the aponeurosis of the transversus abdominis muscle. With the psoas muscle anterior to the transverse process, the erector spinae muscle posterior to the transverse process, and the quadratus lumborum muscle attached to the apex of the transverse process of L4.
Active Comparator: paramedian transverse scan
paramedian transverse scan (PMTS): both left and right, both intertransverse and transverse process window
The ultrasound transducer is positioned 4 cm lateral to the midline along the intercristal line and just above the iliac crest. The transducer is also directed slightly medially.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Video (VDO) loops visualization of lumbar plexus
Time Frame: 1 month
Percentage of Video (VDO) loops visualization of lumbar plexus comparing between two techniques
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ultrasound visibility score of each relevant structures
Time Frame: 1 month
10 structures: Erector spinae muscle, Quadratus lumborum muscle, Psoas muscle, Vertebral body, Inferior vena cava, Articular process of the lumbar vertebra, Lumbar paravertebral space, lumbar nerve root, Lumbar plexus nerve, Psoas compartment Using 4-point Likert scale (0, not visible; 1, hardly visible; 2, well visible; 3, very well visible)
1 month
Overall ultrasound visibility score of 10 structures
Time Frame: 1 month
Sum of ultrasound visibility score of 10 relevant structures: Erector spinae muscle, Quadratus lumborum muscle, Psoas muscle, Vertebral body, Inferior vena cava, Articular process of the lumbar vertebra, Lumbar paravertebral space, lumbar nerve root, Lumbar plexus nerve, Psoas compartment
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pawinee Pawinee, M.D, 66864001721

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

December 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 5, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe