Mobilized Psychoeducation and Skills Based Intervention (Pep-Pal) for Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Illness

July 31, 2020 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver

A Pilot Study of a Mobilized Psychoeducation and Skills Based Intervention (Pep-Pal) for Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Illness

The proposed project is a pilot study of the Pep-Pal (Psychoeducation and Skills Based Intervention) versus a treatment as usual control group. A total of 60 caregivers; including caregivers of patients with HSCT (Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation), caregivers enrolled in Phase I clinical trials, and caregivers of patients with advanced cancer (Stage III, solid tumor) will be enrolled in this study. The investigators do not expect different outcomes from these three groups, rather these populations are selected to optimize recruitment within a short time frame. The caregivers will be randomized to either treatment as usual or Pep-Pal intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The proposed project is a pilot study of the Pep-Pal intervention versus a treatment as usual control group. A total of 60 caregivers; caregivers of patients with HSCT, caregivers of patients enrolled in phase I oncology trials, and caregivers of patients with advanced cancer (Stage IV, solid tumor) will be enrolled in this study. The investigators do not expect different outcomes from these three groups, rather these populations are selected to optimize recruitment within a short time frame. The caregivers will be randomized to either treatment as usual or Pep-Pal intervention. The proposed study population is based on prior research indicating that caregivers of patients receiving HSCT, caregivers of patients enrolled in phase I oncology trials, and caregivers of patients with advanced cancer experience significant distress. In addition, an initial study of caregivers of patients receiving allogeneic-HSCT were able to benefit from a brief, cognitive behavioral stress management treatment approach. A study examining distress in phase I oncology clinical trial patient caregivers highlighted the need for more support for this significantly distressed population. Furthermore, initial results of the qualitative development study for Pep-Pal yielded support for a mobilized platform delivery of resources for caregivers to manage distress because they acknowledged many barriers to engaging in in-person treatment to manage distress.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

69

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado, Denver

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Women and men ≥ 18 years of age of any ethnicity
  2. Must endorse a moderate level of anxiety (e.g. Score above an 8 on the Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS))
  3. Speak and read in English
  4. Caregiver of a patient with auto HSCT who are moving forward with bone marrow transplant or have receive a bone marrow transplant
  5. Caregiver of a patient in a Phase I Clinical Trial
  6. Caregiver of a patient diagnosed with advanced cancer (stage III or stage IV)
  7. No Cognitive or psychiatric conditions prohibiting participation
  8. Must meet criteria for being a primary caregiver, defined as, the person in the patient's life who is primarily responsible for care decisions, emotionally invested in the patient's care, provides instrumental care such as transportation for a patient receiving auto-HSCT, enrolled in a phase I oncology clinical trial, or of a patient diagnosed with advanced cancer (stage IV, solid tumor).
  9. Have a computer, smartphone, or tablet with internet access

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Caregivers below the age of 18
  2. Score below an 8 on the Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS)
  3. Cannot speak and read in English
  4. Patient does not receive a bone marrow transplant
  5. Patient is not enrolled in a Phase I clinical trial
  6. Patient is not diagnosed with Stage III or Stage IV cancer
  7. Cognitive conditions prohibiting participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pep-Pal + Treatment as Usual
If the caregiver is assigned to the Pep-Pal intervention condition, the RA will provide access to the mobilized website (passcode) through an email. Caregivers will be instructed to watch each session at least once. It will be recommended that caregivers watch one to two new sessions per week so that they can have enough time to practice the skills between sessions. In addition, they will be told that they can go back and watch the sessions for review as many times as they like. Full participation will be defined as watching at least 7/9 sessions (75% of program) based on previous criteria for similar intervention completion in a prior trial with advanced cancer patients.
Pep-Pal is designed to complement the utilization of other resources, provide support when no other resources can be obtained, or provide support in the interim until greater resources can be obtained. In this way, Pep-Pal is a resource for our most hard to reach caregivers.
Active Comparator: Treatment as Usual
Treatment as usual provides voluntary (at the caregiver's discretion) support services for the caregivers which is rarely used by the caregivers.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of Exit Interviews
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Qualitative feedback will be gathered from the first 15 Pep-Pal completer's for individual interviews (5 from Phase I group, 5 from Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) group, 5 from medical oncology) upon completion of the follow-up assessments at 12 weeks about usage, acceptability of content, and impressions of using Pep-Pal.
12 weeks
Pep-Pal Self-Report sessions at 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The Investigators will assess feasibility by examining recruitment, retention, as well as reasons for refusal, frequency of sessions watched and length of time spent watching each session. Self report usage of peppal: Usage of Pep-Pal will be quantitatively assessed by asking each participant in the intervention group about their usage including frequency; how many times they watched each session and length of viewing for each session (partial or complete). They will be asked to rate level of usage based on a Likert-scale ranging from not at all to very often for each session (0-10). They will be asked to rank order the list of sessions from most helpful to least helpful.
12 weeks
Evaluation of Self-Report Caregiver reported outcomes at Baseline
Time Frame: Week 1
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety subscale (HADS-A)
Week 1
Evaluation of Self-report caregiver reported outcomes at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Week 12
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety subscale (HADS-A)
Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of Self-report caregiver reported outcomes at baseline
Time Frame: Week 1
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD)
Week 1
Evaluation of Self-report caregiver reported outcomes at baseline
Time Frame: Week 1
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Week 1
Evaluation of Self-report caregiver reported outcomes at baseline
Time Frame: Week 1
Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
Week 1
Evaluation of Self-report caregiver reported outcomes at baseline
Time Frame: Week 1
Male Sexual Health Questionnaire(MSHQ)
Week 1
Evaluation of Self-report caregiver reported outcomes at baseline
Time Frame: Week 1
Measure of Current Status (MOCS-A)
Week 1
Evaluation of Self-report caregiver reported outcomes at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Week 12
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD)
Week 12
Evaluation of Self-report caregiver reported outcomes at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Week 12
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Week 12
Evaluation of Self-report caregiver reported outcomes at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Week 12
Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
Week 12
Evaluation of Self-report caregiver reported outcomes at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Week 12
Male Sexual Health Questionnaire(MSHQ)
Week 12
Evaluation of Self-report caregiver reported outcomes at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Week 12
Measure of Current Status (MOCS-A)
Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nicole R Amoyal-Pensak, PhD, University of Colorado, Denver

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 17, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 13, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

December 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16-0990

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Treatment as Usual

Subscribe