A Mobile Phone Game to Prevent HIV Among Young Africans

September 23, 2019 updated by: Kate Winskell, Emory University
This project will test the feasibility of an electronic game to prevent HIV among African preadolescents, delivered via inexpensive Android smart phones. In order to collect feasibility data for a future randomized controlled trial, this study involves the pilot-testing of the intervention with a sample of young people in Nyanza region, Kenya, where 11.4% of young women ages 15-24 are HIV-infected. This feasibility study will be carried out with the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This project will test the feasibility of an electronic game for preadolescents, delivered via inexpensive Android smart phones. The game is informed by socio-behavioral and pedagogical theories, evidence-based practice, and formative research on youth sexual culture in sub-Saharan Africa. It is designed to: educate young players, ages 11-14, about sexual health and HIV/AIDS; build risk-reduction skills and related self-efficacy for prevention of HIV, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and unintended pregnancy; challenge harmful gender norms and HIV stigma; and foster dialogue with parents and caregivers.

The proposed feasibility test will be conducted in Western Kenya. Sixty preadolescents will be enrolled in the trial, 30 in the study arm and 30 in the control arm. The Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) has established community advisory boards (CABs) in Kisumu, which will be available to the proposed study.

Data collection will take place at KEMRI offices, health clinics, or in the meeting room of a local community-based organization (CBO). In addition, data on game-play will be automatically collected on mobile phones given to preadolescent study participants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kisumu, Kenya
        • Kenya Medical Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

11 years to 14 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Aged 11-14 at time of recruitment
  • Resident in Nyanza region, Kenya
  • Having basic literacy in English
  • Only one child enrolled per family

Exclusion criteria:

  • Aged <11 or >14 at time of recruitment
  • Not resident in Nyanza region, Kenya
  • Without basic literacy in English
  • Sibling to a child already enrolled in the study
  • Participant in formative research to inform the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tumaini Mobile Phone Game
Participants randomized to this arm will be invited to play the Tumaini game.
Tumaini is a scenario-based role-playing game application, optimized for use on low-cost Android smartphones. Participants will be invited to play the game for at least ten hours over a period of three weeks. The game is designed to: educate players about sexual health and HIV/AIDS; build risk-reduction skills and related self-efficacy for prevention of HIV/STIs and unintended pregnancy; challenge HIV stigma and harmful gender norms; and promote parent-child dialogue.
No Intervention: Standard of Care
Participants randomized to this arm will receive no intervention beyond the current standard of care for sexual education.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number Interested in Participating
Time Frame: Month 1
To evaluate the feasibility of conducting a technology based intervention in a low resource area, the number of eligible individuals who were interested in participating after hearing about the study was examined. Letters were sent to 150 families inviting them to attend an informational meeting and 126 attended a meeting and were assess for eligibility.
Month 1
Time to Recruitment of 60 Participants
Time Frame: Month 1
The number of days needed to recruit 60 participants.
Month 1
Number of Participants Lost to Follow Up
Time Frame: Duration of Study (Up to 4 Months)
The number of participants who consented to participate but then later could not be reached prior to completing all study visits.
Duration of Study (Up to 4 Months)
Number of Participants Completing the Study
Time Frame: Duration of Study (Up to 4 Months)
The number of participants who completed all study visits after providing consent are presented here.
Duration of Study (Up to 4 Months)
Number of Phones Returned
Time Frame: Month 2
The phone retention rate (phones not lost during the intervention) was assessed by the number of phones returned at the end of the intervention.
Month 2
Number Reporting Game Was Very Fun
Time Frame: Day 17 (post-intervention)
Game acceptability was assessed by asking participants how fun playing the game was. The number of participants reporting that the game was "very fun" are presented here.
Day 17 (post-intervention)
Number Reporting the Game is Valuable
Time Frame: Day 17 (post-intervention)
The value of the game was assessed with several questions regarding how much the participants learned and how useful the information is. The number of participants reporting that they learned a lot, found the information very useful now, and found the information very useful for the future, are presented below.
Day 17 (post-intervention)
Number of Participants Feeling Very Safe
Time Frame: Day 17 (post-intervention)
Personal safety associated with being in possession of the phone was assessed by the post-intervention survey. Phones provided for the intervention were set up so that all other features were blocked and only function the phone could perform was playing the game.
Day 17 (post-intervention)
Number of Participants Playing the Game
Time Frame: Day 17 (post-intervention)
Participants were asked to play the game for at least one hour per day for 16 days. The number of participants who reported playing the game everyday and the number of participants who reported playing the game for an hour or more each time are presented here.
Day 17 (post-intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Knowledge
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 17 (post-intervention), 6 Weeks Post-intervention
Knowledge measures will be assessed via Yes/No survey questions and will address puberty, HIV, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), pregnancy, condoms, and alcohol and drugs. Knowledge was assessed with 15 items and responses are coded as 0 or 1. Total scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating increased knowledge. A positive value for the change from baseline score indicates an increase in knowledge from the baseline assessment.
Baseline, Day 17 (post-intervention), 6 Weeks Post-intervention
Change in Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 17 (post-intervention), 6 Weeks Post-intervention
Self-efficacy was assessed via a 3-point Likert scale, and addressed self-efficacy to seek advice about puberty, sex, relationships; to communicate about protected sex; to reject peer, partner and adult pressure to engage in risk behaviors. Self-efficacy was assessed with 9 items which were scored as 0, 0.5 or 1. Total scores ranged from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating increased self-efficacy. A positive value for the change from baseline score indicates an increase in self-efficacy since the baseline assessment.
Baseline, Day 17 (post-intervention), 6 Weeks Post-intervention
Change in Risk Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 17 (post-intervention), 6 Weeks Post-intervention
Risk assessment was assessed via a 3-point Likert scale, and addressed perceived risk of certain risk situations/behaviors and of contracting HIV. Risk is assessed with 4 items and responses are coded as 0, 0.5 or 1. Total scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating increased risk assessment. A positive value for the change from baseline score indicates an increase in assessing risky situations as risky.
Baseline, Day 17 (post-intervention), 6 Weeks Post-intervention
Change in Behavioral Intention
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 17 (post-intervention), 6 Weeks Post-intervention
Behavioral intention was assessed via Yes/No questions. The measure addressed intention to seek advice, to avoid risk situations, and to engage in health protective behaviors. Behavioral intention is assessed with 6 items that are scored as 0 or 1 and total scores range from 0 to 6. Higher scores in indicate more intention to partake in health protective behaviors and a positive value for the change from baseline score indicates a desirable change in intention.
Baseline, Day 17 (post-intervention), 6 Weeks Post-intervention
Change in Future Orientation
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 17 (post-intervention), 6 Weeks Post-intervention
Future orientation was assessed via a single multiple-choice question (Yes/No/Maybe) and addressed perceived locus of control. Response is coded as 0, 0.5, or 1 and higher scores indicate greater understanding of future locus of control. A positive value for the change from baseline score indicates a desirable change in scores.
Baseline, Day 17 (post-intervention), 6 Weeks Post-intervention
Change in Perceived Social Norms
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 17 (post-intervention), 6 Weeks Post-intervention
Perceived social norms were assessed via a 3-point Likert and addressed sex, gender, condoms, and HIV stigma. Social norms were assessed with 6 items that are scored as 0, 0.5, or 1. Total scores range from 0 to 6 with higher scores indicating perception of more desirable social norms. A positive value for the change from baseline scores indicates a desirable change.
Baseline, Day 17 (post-intervention), 6 Weeks Post-intervention
Change in Attitudes
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 17 (post-intervention), 6 Weeks Post-intervention
Attitudes were assessed via 3-pt Likert survey questions relating to HIV stigma, condoms, sex, gender, and future orientation. Attitudes were assessed with 15 items and responses coded as 0, 0.5, or 1. Total scores ranged from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more desirable attitudes. A positive value for the change from baseline score indicates an increase in desirable attitudes.
Baseline, Day 17 (post-intervention), 6 Weeks Post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kate Winskell, PhD, Emory University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 20, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 19, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 19, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV/AIDS

Clinical Trials on Tumaini Mobile Phone Game

Subscribe