Performance Equivalence of Rainbow Acoustic Monitoring (RAM) Small Sensor and RAM Revision D Sensor

October 17, 2018 updated by: Masimo Corporation
The purpose of this study was to conduct a side by side comparison of the accuracy of respiratory rate (RR) between our investigational Rainbow Acoustic Monitoring (RAM) small sensor and the FDA-cleared RAM Revision D sensor in healthy volunteers under controlled conditions.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Irvine, California, United States, 92618
        • Masimo Clinical Lab

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female
  • Physical status of ASA I or II
  • Must be able to read and communicate in English
  • Has signed written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA physical status of III, IV, and V
  • Subject has any medical condition which in the judgement of the investigator, renders them inappropriate for participating in this study
  • Inability to tolerate sitting still or minimal movement for at least 30 minutes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Test group
The subjects will be enrolled in the test group and will simultaneously receive both RAM sensors.
Noninvasive acoustic monitoring device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance comparison of RAM sensors by ARMS calculation
Time Frame: 50 minutes
Performance comparison was determined by comparing the noninvasive respiration rate measurement of the RAM sensors and calculating the arithmetic root mean square (Arms) error value.
50 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 2, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 29, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

October 29, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TR29836A-TP16846C

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on RAM sensors

3
Subscribe