Wearable Monitoring Systems for Swallowing Function and Disorders

July 26, 2023 updated by: Georgia A. Malandraki, Purdue University

Development and Validation of Mechanically Compliant Wearable Monitoring Systems for Swallowing Function and Disorders

Wearable tele-rehabilitation technology allows for the efficient provision of rehabilitation services from a distance, facilitating tele-management of many disorders. The proposed research will develop and validate a set of mechanically compliant, easy-to-use, and inexpensive wearable tele-monitoring systems, for future use in the rehabilitation of swallowing disorders (dysphagia). The hypothesis is that the newly developed wearable sensors will have equal or better performance than traditional wired sensors used today in clinical practice. Factors related to signal quality and patient reported outcomes (e.g., satisfaction/comfort level, adverse effects etc.) will be examined.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • West Lafayette, Indiana, United States, 47907
        • Purdue University I-EaT Lab

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 88 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion criteria for healthy adults:

  • Age 18-30 OR 50-90 years of age
  • No history of dysphagia
  • No history of a neurological disorder
  • A score in the normal/mild range on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA):
  • A score of <3 on the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10, a self-report screening for dysphagia).

Inclusion criteria for patients with dysphagia:

  • Age 18-90 years of age
  • Diagnoses of dysphagia as a result of a neurological disorder (e.g., stroke, Parkinson's disease).
  • A score in the normal/mild range on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).
  • A score of ≥3 on the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10, a self-report screening for dysphagia).

Exclusion Criteria:

• Significant cognitive impairment (a score in the moderate-severe range on MoCA):

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Sensors
This arm will include the use of the experimental wearable sensors we are developing.
Several iterations of a wearable surface EMG sensors patch and a wearable intra-oral lingual press device that we will develop, will be tested against commercially available wired devices. The wearable sensor patch will be an ultrathin patch with a honeycomb-inspired design that includes sEMG and strain sensors in order to capture muscle activity and thyroid movement signals from the submental area during swallows and swallow maneuvers/exercises. The wearable intra-oral device will integrate a wireless intraoral sensor system that will allow simultaneous recording of lingual pressure and movement during swallows and lingual tasks in a wireless fashion. Participants will perform standardized swallow tasks with both devices.
Active Comparator: Conventional Sensors
This arm will include the use of the conventional sensors: regular snap on sEMG electrodes and IOPI device bulb.
Conventional sensors will include snap-on wired electrodes and the use of the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument as the control conditions. The same set of standardized swallow tasks will be completed with the conventional and commercially available devices as well.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Normalized task-related sEMG amplitude (signal quality parameter)
Time Frame: Post each experiment (i.e., 1 hour after the sensors have been placed)
Normalized sEMG amplitude values during standardized swallow tasks and maneuvers will be recorded and compared between the two sEMG devices. Normalized amplitude is used as a signal quality parameter and is not a health related outcome.
Post each experiment (i.e., 1 hour after the sensors have been placed)
Peak pressure during maximum lingual press and swallows (signal quality parameter)
Time Frame: Post each experiment (i.e., 1 hour after the sensors have been placed)
The peak pressure achieved during maximum lingual presses and during swallows will be recorded and compared between the two lingual press devices tested. Peak pressure is used here as a signal quality parameter and not as a health related outcome.
Post each experiment (i.e., 1 hour after the sensors have been placed)
Signal to Noise ratio (signal quality parameter)
Time Frame: Post each experiment (i.e., 1 hour after the sensors have been placed)
Signal to Noise ratio will be calculated and compared between sensor types for both the sEMG and the lingual press devices tested. Signal to noise ration is a signal quality parameter and not a health related outcome.
Post each experiment (i.e., 1 hour after the sensors have been placed)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse effects and safety
Time Frame: Pre and Post each experiment (i.e., right before the placement of sensors on the subject and 1 hour after the sensors have been placed and 5 minutes after their removal)
Safety will be examined by documenting the incidence of skin and intraoral irritations in the subjects. A visual inspection form including a binary scale (YES/NO) has been devised by the investigators (no formal name) and will be used by a rater who will thoroughly inspect the participants' submandibular skin and intraoral cavity before and after each experiment. For any irritation or change in appearance YES will be selected and the type of irritation will be descriptively recorded (e.g., red skin). This form will be completed by a rater who is not part of the data collection process and who is blinded to sensors type to avoid any bias.The number of YESs will be used to calculate the incidence of these adverse effects in the sample.
Pre and Post each experiment (i.e., right before the placement of sensors on the subject and 1 hour after the sensors have been placed and 5 minutes after their removal)
Ease of use/comfort
Time Frame: Post each experiment (i.e., 1 hour after the sensors have been placed)
Ease-of-use/comfort will be examined using a 10-item survey also devised by the investigators (using a positive centered 5-point Likert scale) with questions about ease-of-use/comfort after each experiment with each device. This survey includes statements related to the participants' ease-of-use/comfort during the experimental protocol (e.g., I was comfortable while the experimenter placed the sensors on my skin or in my mouth). The answers will be rated on a 10-point scale (i.e., 1 = extremely uncomfortable, 10 = extremely comfortable). Higher values indicate better or higher satisfaction/comfort scores. Total scores will be compared across conditions/devices tested.
Post each experiment (i.e., 1 hour after the sensors have been placed)
Onset of sEMG activity relative to onset of swallow apnea
Time Frame: Post each experiment (i.e., 1 hour after the sensors have been placed)
Time of onset of sEMG activity relative to the time of onset of swallow apnea will be calculated for each task and device. This variable will serve as a timing measure to help us evaluate the temporal sensitivity of the systems.
Post each experiment (i.e., 1 hour after the sensors have been placed)
Time to reach peak pressure
Time Frame: Post each experiment (i.e., 1 hour after the sensors have been placed)
Time to reach peak pressure will be measured in seconds and is another temporal measure of interest.
Post each experiment (i.e., 1 hour after the sensors have been placed)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Georgia A. Malandraki, PhD, Associate Professor
  • Principal Investigator: Chi Hwan Lee, PhD, Assistant Professor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 11, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 25, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1807020788
  • 1R21EB026099-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Deglutition Disorders

Clinical Trials on Tele-EaT Sensors

3
Subscribe