Compare the Q-Cup With Other Umbilical Cord Blood Collection Techniques (qcup)

December 20, 2019 updated by: Sireesha Reddy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso

Compare the Q-Cup With Other Umbilical Cord Blood Collection Techniques: A Feasibility Study

Currently there is no standardized method of collecting and transferring umbilical cord blood to laboratory vacuum tubes. Current methods are messy and may require needles to draw the blood presenting risk of blood exposure and percutaneous injury to obstetrical personnel. A safer, more efficient method of collecting cord blood is needed. The investigators propose to use the Q-Cup technology for collecting cord blood. The Q-Cup device is a two-piece injection molded blood collection and transfer device that enables safe and easy collection of blood from the newborn's umbilical cord and readily transfers the blood into a laboratory vacuum tube. The device consists of a collection cup with a wide opening to easily collect blood from the umbilical cord and a guide tube with a recessed needle which is attached to the collection cup. The operator is enabled to fill the required vacuum containing tubes in a clean, quick, efficient and safe manner by simply inserting the vacuum tube into the guide tube of the Q-Cup. As a result, there is less risk of blood exposure and percutaneous injury and blood is collected more efficiently. This device allows the practitioner to collect and transfer umbilical cord blood: without the need for removing the stopper from the vacuum tube (reducing mess and contamination) and without the need for a syringe and exposed needle (reducing injury and infection).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Approximately 4 million babies were born in the United States in 2015. Umbilical cord blood (UBC) collection is a routine hospital procedure done to evaluate a newborn's health after the birth of the fetus. UBC is tested to measure bilirubin levels, blood gases, blood sugar levels, blood types, complete blood counts, and platelet counts. UBC is collected by either draining the blood into the collection vial, milking the umbilical cord of blood, or extracting the blood by injecting a needle with a syringe. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) estimates 5.6 million workers in the health care industry are at risk of occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens. Occupational exposure during umbilical cord blood collection may occur due to the great deal of blood and amniotic fluid present at the time of delivery. This fluid causes the physician to have a slippery grasp on the umbilical cord and vials for collection. These methods pose a risk of exposing Labor and Delivery staff to blood borne diseases. The drainage and milking method can lead to an increased amount of spilled blood while the extraction method may lead to accidental needle sticks. Exposure to bloodborne pathogens may be amplified when the umbilical cord is engorged with blood and as the needle is inserted in the cord, splatter may occur. The Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act was signed into law on November 6, 2000 in which employees were required to implement safer medical devices. Many patents have been obtained for umbilical cord blood collection devices however, there has not been a standardized method of collecting and transferring umbilical cord blood to the laboratory vacuum tubes. The goal of this project is to prove the feasibility of using the Q-Cup, a patent pending disposable, two-piece blood collection and transfer device for safely and efficiently collecting umbilical cord blood and transferring it into laboratory vacuum tubes.

The overall objective of this project is to prove the feasibility of using a two-piece umbilical blood collection and transfer device for safely and effectively collecting umbilical cord blood and transferring the blood into a laboratory vacuum tube. Also, the investigators will assess provider satisfaction, safety, ease of use, length of procedure comparing passive flow into blood tubes and the Q-cup technology. The Q-Cup technology can take part in the effort to reduce occupation exposures including percutaneous exposures during labor and delivery in general and by studying specifically the heretofore neglected category of umbilical cord blood collection and transfer. Efforts in this area will help focus attention on this previously ignored domain and help establish a standard of care and safety during this frequent procedure.

The investigators hypothesize the Q-Cup will be a more effective transfer method than current practices utilized for umbilical cord blood collection.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • El Paso, Texas, United States, 79912
        • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Obstetric patients must be age 18 or older
  • Obstetric patients must be receiving prenatal care at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso Department of Ob-Gyn
  • Obstetric patients must be in their third trimester
  • Obstetric patients must be delivering at University Medical Center

Exclusion Criteria:

  • children will not be included
  • patients in active labor

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
The Q-cup will not be used to collect umbilical cord blood.
Active Comparator: Study Group
The Q-cup will be used to collect umbilical cord blood.
This technology is a different way of collecting umbilical cord blood.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Blood Collection Time
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Anticipating the average lengths of cord blood collection with the standard method is 15 seconds and 30 seconds with the Q-cup, we needed 30 subjects total. 15 in the Q-cup arm of the study and 15 in the comparison group (for a two-sided two-sample t-test with 80% power, an alpha of 0.05, and a common standard deviation of 14 seconds). 30 participants were recruited into the study, however, the delivery providers were in charge of collecting this outcome.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determining Umbilical Cord Collection Cleanliness With the Q-cup as Compared to the Standard Blood Collection Method
Time Frame: At Delivery which could be between 1 to 12 weeks after Baseline.
Participants' delivery providers were asked to self-administer a survey in which they were to assess blood collection for cleanliness. Possible choices were excellent/ good or fair/poor. Some delivery providers did not fill out the surveys and therefore, data was missing.
At Delivery which could be between 1 to 12 weeks after Baseline.
Fill Capacity of Umbilical Cord Blood Using the Qcup Compared to Standard of Care
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Participant delivery providers were asked to self-administer a survey in which they were to assess the fill capacity of the lab tubes using the Qcup or the standard method. Possible choices were filled to capacity and not filled to capacity. Some delivery providers did not fill out the surveys and therefore, data was missing.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Schaffer, MD, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 19, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 14, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 28, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • E17020

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnant

Clinical Trials on Q-cup

Subscribe