Comparison of Functional Results of ADM X3-MoP Cup (Stryker) and a CoC Cup (Zimmer) in Young Patients

January 10, 2024 updated by: University of Aarhus

A Single-Center Randomized, Patient-Blinded, Prospective Five-Year Study to Compare the Functional Results After Insertion of ADM X3-MoP Cup (Stryker) and a CoC Cup (Zimmer) in Primary THA

A Single-Center Randomized, Patient-Blinded, Prospective Five-Year Study to Compare the Functional Results after Insertion of ADM X3-MoP Cup (Stryker) and a CoC Cup (Zimmer) in Primary THA. 60 patients will be enrolled during a 2 year period. At surgery tantalum beads will be inserted into predrilled holes of the polyethylene rim for assessment of motion of the large mobile poly in the ADM Trident Cup by use of RSA. Patients will be followed by functional examinations as well as PROM assessment.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Detailed Description

With Metal-on-Metal (MoM) articulations leaving the marked the THA bearing choice for younger patients is currently debated and overall the choice stands between CoC and MoP. New HXLPE is wear-resistant and safe and clinical HXLPE wear (RSA) hardly exceed the wear measured in retrieval CoC implants. For CoC articulations stripe wear on edge loading is a reported problem leading to increased wear in examined retrieval components and CoC wear is dependent on component position. Although the risk is very small, CoC bearings are at still at risk of fracture, and functional squeaking is a complication that adversely affects the quality of life in about 1% of CoC THA patient. Dual mobility MoP cups were designed for reducing hip dislocations in older patients treated with THA after medial hip fractures. The concept provides good stability and mobility and may also be an optimal solution for younger and active patients; however, dual mobility MoP has not previously been documented for use in younger patients. The anatomical dual mobility (ADM) cup design (Stryker) is soft tissue sparing (iliopsoas tendon) potentially leading to lesser groin-pain and squeaking is not a concern. It is currently unknown if the outer-articulation of the dual mobility PE liner keeps moving over time or could impinge in the joint capsule in an undesirable position and result in unwanted edge loading and higher wear-rates. Metal ions are produced even in MoP bearings and even though in dual-articulation MoP bearings most (90%) of the motion is believed to occur between the head and liner (ceramic-polyenthylene), the metal ion levels may be higher than expected for MoP hips (large poly contact in metal shell), while expectedly there will be no metal ions in CoC THA.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8000
        • Aarhus University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • primary hip osteoarthritis
  • sufficient bone quality for total hip arthroplasty
  • age 40 through 65 years of age
  • informed and written consent
  • patient can only enter the project with one hip

Exclusion Criteria:

  • neuromuscular or vascular disease in the affected leg
  • patients with osteoporosis
  • fracture sequelae or previous extensive hip surgery
  • patients with metabolic bone disease including rheumatoid arthritis
  • non-Danish citizenship
  • patients who do not comprehend the Danish language
  • senile dementia
  • alcoholism and drug abuse
  • major psychiatric disease
  • current metastatic cancer disease and on-going treatment with radiation therapy/chemotherapy
  • severe systemic disease affecting gait
  • contralateral knee, hip and/or spine disease
  • on-going case regarding industrial injury insurance of the hip
  • patients with very poor dental status

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ADM X3-MoP Cup
THA: ADM dual-mobility hydroxyapatite coated cups with X3TM HXLPE liners on 28mm BIOLOX® delta femoral heads (Stryker) with femoral stems being 2nd generation Accolade stems of the taper lock type, proximal circumferential coated with a 50µm plasma-spray PureFix HA coating to aid the mechanical engagement in bone coating (Stryker)
Active Comparator: CoC Cup
THA: CoC BIOLOX® delta-delta large-head single-mobility cementless fiber-mesh titanium coated acetabular system from Zimmer (Zimmer TrilogyIT cup/CLS spotorno stem) with a grit-blasted osteophilic titanium alloy CLS® Spotorno femoral stems (Zimmer) that has a three-dimensional wedge shape and sharpened ribs in the proximal region

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motion analysis (accelerometer (Ax3 Axivity) based activity monitoring)
Time Frame: 5 year
For all participants: Inertia sensors are a new technology for patient motion analysis which allows simple and fast routine clinical movement analysis and long-term activity monitoring. We will employ the newest generation of accelerometer (Ax3 Axivity) based activity monitoring (small, light, low cost, validated for orthopaedic patients also with walking aids) to count, in real life, the number of events and the duration of postures and activities. Further muscle power investigations such as by use of the legg extension power rig will be used.
5 year
questionnaires ("the Harris Hip Score" (HHS), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), the HOOS score, satisfaction, dislocation, and revisions)
Time Frame: 5 year
For all participants: Pre- and postoperative clinical evaluations will be made according to "the Harris Hip Score" (HHS), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), the HOOS score, and satisfaction, dislocations and revisions will be noted. Moreover, pre-operative rest and motion pains will be assessed by visual analogue scale scores (VAS).
5 year
Radiography (implant migration and wear)
Time Frame: 5 year
For all participants: Within a week following surgery a stereo x-ray is performed and this functions as the baseline for future follow-up (in this study at 1 year, 2 years and 5 years). When comparing all stereo x-rays in a patient series, implant migration with respect to a set of bone markers can be calculated in three dimensions as a function of time - similarly wear of the implant surfaces can be evaluated.Fluoroscopic stereoradiometric recordings (Dynamic RSA) can be used to assess the functional motion of implants at desired motion speeds. In this study we record the liner motion of the ADM cup with the patients in different positions that in theory stresses the motion of the liner into new positions at edge-motions. The purpose is to gain knowledge on the safety function of the implant in vivo - if the liner moves and if it positions safely like it is supposed to.
5 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

November 25, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • VEK-44819

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthroplasties, Hip Replacement

Clinical Trials on ADM X3-MoP Cup

3
Subscribe