Compare the Q-Cup With Other Umbilical Cord Blood Collection Techniques (qcup)
Compare the Q-Cup With Other Umbilical Cord Blood Collection Techniques: A Feasibility Study
研究概览
详细说明
Approximately 4 million babies were born in the United States in 2015. Umbilical cord blood (UBC) collection is a routine hospital procedure done to evaluate a newborn's health after the birth of the fetus. UBC is tested to measure bilirubin levels, blood gases, blood sugar levels, blood types, complete blood counts, and platelet counts. UBC is collected by either draining the blood into the collection vial, milking the umbilical cord of blood, or extracting the blood by injecting a needle with a syringe. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) estimates 5.6 million workers in the health care industry are at risk of occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens. Occupational exposure during umbilical cord blood collection may occur due to the great deal of blood and amniotic fluid present at the time of delivery. This fluid causes the physician to have a slippery grasp on the umbilical cord and vials for collection. These methods pose a risk of exposing Labor and Delivery staff to blood borne diseases. The drainage and milking method can lead to an increased amount of spilled blood while the extraction method may lead to accidental needle sticks. Exposure to bloodborne pathogens may be amplified when the umbilical cord is engorged with blood and as the needle is inserted in the cord, splatter may occur. The Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act was signed into law on November 6, 2000 in which employees were required to implement safer medical devices. Many patents have been obtained for umbilical cord blood collection devices however, there has not been a standardized method of collecting and transferring umbilical cord blood to the laboratory vacuum tubes. The goal of this project is to prove the feasibility of using the Q-Cup, a patent pending disposable, two-piece blood collection and transfer device for safely and efficiently collecting umbilical cord blood and transferring it into laboratory vacuum tubes.
The overall objective of this project is to prove the feasibility of using a two-piece umbilical blood collection and transfer device for safely and effectively collecting umbilical cord blood and transferring the blood into a laboratory vacuum tube. Also, the investigators will assess provider satisfaction, safety, ease of use, length of procedure comparing passive flow into blood tubes and the Q-cup technology. The Q-Cup technology can take part in the effort to reduce occupation exposures including percutaneous exposures during labor and delivery in general and by studying specifically the heretofore neglected category of umbilical cord blood collection and transfer. Efforts in this area will help focus attention on this previously ignored domain and help establish a standard of care and safety during this frequent procedure.
The investigators hypothesize the Q-Cup will be a more effective transfer method than current practices utilized for umbilical cord blood collection.
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Texas
-
El Paso、Texas、美国、79912
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Obstetric patients must be age 18 or older
- Obstetric patients must be receiving prenatal care at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso Department of Ob-Gyn
- Obstetric patients must be in their third trimester
- Obstetric patients must be delivering at University Medical Center
Exclusion Criteria:
- children will not be included
- patients in active labor
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:其他
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:无(打开标签)
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
无干预:Control
The Q-cup will not be used to collect umbilical cord blood.
|
|
|
有源比较器:Study Group
The Q-cup will be used to collect umbilical cord blood.
|
This technology is a different way of collecting umbilical cord blood.
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Blood Collection Time
大体时间:12 weeks
|
Anticipating the average lengths of cord blood collection with the standard method is 15 seconds and 30 seconds with the Q-cup, we needed 30 subjects total.
15 in the Q-cup arm of the study and 15 in the comparison group (for a two-sided two-sample t-test with 80% power, an alpha of 0.05, and a common standard deviation of 14 seconds).
30 participants were recruited into the study, however, the delivery providers were in charge of collecting this outcome.
|
12 weeks
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Determining Umbilical Cord Collection Cleanliness With the Q-cup as Compared to the Standard Blood Collection Method
大体时间:At Delivery which could be between 1 to 12 weeks after Baseline.
|
Participants' delivery providers were asked to self-administer a survey in which they were to assess blood collection for cleanliness.
Possible choices were excellent/ good or fair/poor.
Some delivery providers did not fill out the surveys and therefore, data was missing.
|
At Delivery which could be between 1 to 12 weeks after Baseline.
|
|
Fill Capacity of Umbilical Cord Blood Using the Qcup Compared to Standard of Care
大体时间:12 weeks
|
Participant delivery providers were asked to self-administer a survey in which they were to assess the fill capacity of the lab tubes using the Qcup or the standard method.
Possible choices were filled to capacity and not filled to capacity.
Some delivery providers did not fill out the surveys and therefore, data was missing.
|
12 weeks
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员:Michael Schaffer, MD、Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso
出版物和有用的链接
一般刊物
有用的网址
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.
Q-cup的临床试验
-
Stryker Trauma GmbH完全的股骨头坏死 | 原发性骨关节炎 | 先天性脱臼 | 股骨颈骨折 | 髋关节创伤后骨关节炎
-
Kenneth PalmerUnited States Department of Defense招聘中
-
Medical University of Warsaw招聘中