此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Compare the Q-Cup With Other Umbilical Cord Blood Collection Techniques (qcup)

2019年12月20日 更新者:Sireesha Reddy、Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso

Compare the Q-Cup With Other Umbilical Cord Blood Collection Techniques: A Feasibility Study

Currently there is no standardized method of collecting and transferring umbilical cord blood to laboratory vacuum tubes. Current methods are messy and may require needles to draw the blood presenting risk of blood exposure and percutaneous injury to obstetrical personnel. A safer, more efficient method of collecting cord blood is needed. The investigators propose to use the Q-Cup technology for collecting cord blood. The Q-Cup device is a two-piece injection molded blood collection and transfer device that enables safe and easy collection of blood from the newborn's umbilical cord and readily transfers the blood into a laboratory vacuum tube. The device consists of a collection cup with a wide opening to easily collect blood from the umbilical cord and a guide tube with a recessed needle which is attached to the collection cup. The operator is enabled to fill the required vacuum containing tubes in a clean, quick, efficient and safe manner by simply inserting the vacuum tube into the guide tube of the Q-Cup. As a result, there is less risk of blood exposure and percutaneous injury and blood is collected more efficiently. This device allows the practitioner to collect and transfer umbilical cord blood: without the need for removing the stopper from the vacuum tube (reducing mess and contamination) and without the need for a syringe and exposed needle (reducing injury and infection).

研究概览

地位

完全的

条件

干预/治疗

详细说明

Approximately 4 million babies were born in the United States in 2015. Umbilical cord blood (UBC) collection is a routine hospital procedure done to evaluate a newborn's health after the birth of the fetus. UBC is tested to measure bilirubin levels, blood gases, blood sugar levels, blood types, complete blood counts, and platelet counts. UBC is collected by either draining the blood into the collection vial, milking the umbilical cord of blood, or extracting the blood by injecting a needle with a syringe. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) estimates 5.6 million workers in the health care industry are at risk of occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens. Occupational exposure during umbilical cord blood collection may occur due to the great deal of blood and amniotic fluid present at the time of delivery. This fluid causes the physician to have a slippery grasp on the umbilical cord and vials for collection. These methods pose a risk of exposing Labor and Delivery staff to blood borne diseases. The drainage and milking method can lead to an increased amount of spilled blood while the extraction method may lead to accidental needle sticks. Exposure to bloodborne pathogens may be amplified when the umbilical cord is engorged with blood and as the needle is inserted in the cord, splatter may occur. The Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act was signed into law on November 6, 2000 in which employees were required to implement safer medical devices. Many patents have been obtained for umbilical cord blood collection devices however, there has not been a standardized method of collecting and transferring umbilical cord blood to the laboratory vacuum tubes. The goal of this project is to prove the feasibility of using the Q-Cup, a patent pending disposable, two-piece blood collection and transfer device for safely and efficiently collecting umbilical cord blood and transferring it into laboratory vacuum tubes.

The overall objective of this project is to prove the feasibility of using a two-piece umbilical blood collection and transfer device for safely and effectively collecting umbilical cord blood and transferring the blood into a laboratory vacuum tube. Also, the investigators will assess provider satisfaction, safety, ease of use, length of procedure comparing passive flow into blood tubes and the Q-cup technology. The Q-Cup technology can take part in the effort to reduce occupation exposures including percutaneous exposures during labor and delivery in general and by studying specifically the heretofore neglected category of umbilical cord blood collection and transfer. Efforts in this area will help focus attention on this previously ignored domain and help establish a standard of care and safety during this frequent procedure.

The investigators hypothesize the Q-Cup will be a more effective transfer method than current practices utilized for umbilical cord blood collection.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

32

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Texas
      • El Paso、Texas、美国、79912
        • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 75年 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

女性

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Obstetric patients must be age 18 or older
  • Obstetric patients must be receiving prenatal care at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso Department of Ob-Gyn
  • Obstetric patients must be in their third trimester
  • Obstetric patients must be delivering at University Medical Center

Exclusion Criteria:

  • children will not be included
  • patients in active labor

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:其他
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
无干预:Control
The Q-cup will not be used to collect umbilical cord blood.
有源比较器:Study Group
The Q-cup will be used to collect umbilical cord blood.
This technology is a different way of collecting umbilical cord blood.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Mean Blood Collection Time
大体时间:12 weeks
Anticipating the average lengths of cord blood collection with the standard method is 15 seconds and 30 seconds with the Q-cup, we needed 30 subjects total. 15 in the Q-cup arm of the study and 15 in the comparison group (for a two-sided two-sample t-test with 80% power, an alpha of 0.05, and a common standard deviation of 14 seconds). 30 participants were recruited into the study, however, the delivery providers were in charge of collecting this outcome.
12 weeks

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Determining Umbilical Cord Collection Cleanliness With the Q-cup as Compared to the Standard Blood Collection Method
大体时间:At Delivery which could be between 1 to 12 weeks after Baseline.
Participants' delivery providers were asked to self-administer a survey in which they were to assess blood collection for cleanliness. Possible choices were excellent/ good or fair/poor. Some delivery providers did not fill out the surveys and therefore, data was missing.
At Delivery which could be between 1 to 12 weeks after Baseline.
Fill Capacity of Umbilical Cord Blood Using the Qcup Compared to Standard of Care
大体时间:12 weeks
Participant delivery providers were asked to self-administer a survey in which they were to assess the fill capacity of the lab tubes using the Qcup or the standard method. Possible choices were filled to capacity and not filled to capacity. Some delivery providers did not fill out the surveys and therefore, data was missing.
12 weeks

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Michael Schaffer, MD、Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

有用的网址

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2017年7月19日

初级完成 (实际的)

2017年9月14日

研究完成 (实际的)

2017年11月28日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2017年5月4日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2017年5月4日

首次发布 (实际的)

2017年5月8日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2020年1月9日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2019年12月20日

最后验证

2019年12月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • E17020

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

是的

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

Q-cup的临床试验

订阅