Comparison of Two Methods for Bowel Preparation in Patients With Constipation

November 24, 2017 updated by: Yanglin Pan, Air Force Military Medical University, China

Comparison of Two Split-dose Regimes for Bowel Preparation in Patients With Constipation

Constipation is a common high risk factor for inadequate bowel preparation. The bowel cleansing efficacy of the standard split-does of 4L seems to be suboptimal in constipated patients. The investigator hypothesized that compared with the standard preparation regime, the split-dose with three times of 4L PEG may be superior in BP quality.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

140

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Xi'an, China, 710032
        • Recruiting
        • Endoscopic center, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yanglin Pan, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18-80 with constipation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of colorectal surgery BMI>30 Suspected colonic stricture or bowel obstruction Use of purgatives within 3 days Pregnancy or lactation Unable to give informed consent Haemodynamically unstable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Split group
Split-dose of 4l PEG was used before and on the day of colonoscopy
All patients were given oral instruction for bowel preparation on the day of appointment and re-instruction through phone call on two days before scheduled colonoscopy. They were instructed to have a regular lunch and take only clear liquid or low-residual food for the dinner on the day before colonoscopy. The participants began to drink the first 2 L of PEG at 7:00-9 PM on the day before colonoscopy at a rate of 250 mL every 15 minutes. On the day of the procedure, patients took the remaining 2 L 4-6 hours before colonoscopy.
Experimental: Three times group
Three times-dose of 4l PEG was used before and on the day of colonoscop of 4l PEG was used before and on the day of colonoscopy
The same as mentioned above. The participants began to drink the first 1.5 L of PEG at 2:00 PM and the second 1.5L of PEG at 8:00PM on the day before colonoscopy at a rate of 250 mL every 15 minutes. On the day of the procedure, patients take the remaining 1.0 L 4-6 hours before colonoscopy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of adequate bowel preparation
Time Frame: 1 year
Adequacy of bowel preparation quality was defined as a total score ≥6 and each segmental score ≥2. The total scores included 3 scores of colonic regions: the right side, the transverse section, and the left side, which ranged from 0 to 9 (0= very poor, 9=excellent). For the unreached colon in incomplete colonoscopy, the segmental BBPS was scored as 0. The total and segmental scores were judged through videos by investigators who were familiar with the criteria and blinded to group allocation.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Withdrawal time
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Cecal intubation rate
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Cecal intubation time
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Adverse event rate
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Polyps detection rate
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 31, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • KY20172055-2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Health Behavior

Clinical Trials on Split dose of 4L PEG

Subscribe