- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03306030
Comparison of Two Methods for Bowel Preparation in Patients With Constipation
November 24, 2017 updated by: Yanglin Pan, Air Force Military Medical University, China
Comparison of Two Split-dose Regimes for Bowel Preparation in Patients With Constipation
Constipation is a common high risk factor for inadequate bowel preparation.
The bowel cleansing efficacy of the standard split-does of 4L seems to be suboptimal in constipated patients.
The investigator hypothesized that compared with the standard preparation regime, the split-dose with three times of 4L PEG may be superior in BP quality.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
140
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Xi'an, China, 710032
- Recruiting
- Endoscopic center, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases
-
Contact:
- Hui Jia, MD
- Phone Number: +862984771536
- Email: jiahuifmmu@163.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Yanglin Pan, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 18-80 with constipation.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of colorectal surgery BMI>30 Suspected colonic stricture or bowel obstruction Use of purgatives within 3 days Pregnancy or lactation Unable to give informed consent Haemodynamically unstable
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Split group
Split-dose of 4l PEG was used before and on the day of colonoscopy
|
All patients were given oral instruction for bowel preparation on the day of appointment and re-instruction through phone call on two days before scheduled colonoscopy.
They were instructed to have a regular lunch and take only clear liquid or low-residual food for the dinner on the day before colonoscopy.
The participants began to drink the first 2 L of PEG at 7:00-9 PM on the day before colonoscopy at a rate of 250 mL every 15 minutes.
On the day of the procedure, patients took the remaining 2 L 4-6 hours before colonoscopy.
|
|
Experimental: Three times group
Three times-dose of 4l PEG was used before and on the day of colonoscop of 4l PEG was used before and on the day of colonoscopy
|
The same as mentioned above.
The participants began to drink the first 1.5 L of PEG at 2:00 PM and the second 1.5L of PEG at 8:00PM on the day before colonoscopy at a rate of 250 mL every 15 minutes.
On the day of the procedure, patients take the remaining 1.0 L 4-6 hours before colonoscopy.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of adequate bowel preparation
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Adequacy of bowel preparation quality was defined as a total score ≥6 and each segmental score ≥2.
The total scores included 3 scores of colonic regions: the right side, the transverse section, and the left side, which ranged from 0 to 9 (0= very poor, 9=excellent).
For the unreached colon in incomplete colonoscopy, the segmental BBPS was scored as 0. The total and segmental scores were judged through videos by investigators who were familiar with the criteria and blinded to group allocation.
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Withdrawal time
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year
|
|
Cecal intubation rate
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year
|
|
Cecal intubation time
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year
|
|
Adverse event rate
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year
|
|
Polyps detection rate
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 1, 2017
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
August 31, 2018
Study Completion (Anticipated)
November 30, 2018
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 5, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 5, 2017
First Posted (Actual)
October 10, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
November 28, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 24, 2017
Last Verified
October 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- KY20172055-2
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Health Behavior
-
Holbaek SygehusCompletedHealth Behavior | Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice | Health-Related Behavior | Health LiteracyDenmark
-
Penn State UniversityCompletedBehavior, HealthUnited States
-
Henry Ford Health SystemUniversity of Kansas; University of Maryland, College ParkActive, not recruiting
-
Istinye UniversityRecruitingHealth-Related BehaviorTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of Texas Rio Grande ValleyHealth and Human Services Commission (HHSC); Pharr-San Juan-Alamo Independent... and other collaboratorsCompletedHealth-Related BehaviorUnited States
-
University of PrimorskaUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences; Ministry of Defence, SloveniaActive, not recruitingHealth-Related BehaviorSlovenia
-
Boston Children's HospitalAllan & Gill Gray FoundationCompletedSleep | Health-Related BehaviorUnited States
-
University of LisbonRecruitingOral Health Behavior Change | Oral Health Care | Oral Health Self-efficacyPortugal
-
Boston Children's HospitalRecruitingSleep | Health-Related BehaviorUnited States
-
Universiti Teknologi MaraUniversiti Putra Malaysia; Ministry of Health, Malaysia; Institute for Health... and other collaboratorsRecruitingHealth Attitude | Health Behavior | Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice | Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice | Health-Related Behavior | Behavior, Health | Attitude to Health | Preparedness | OutbreaksMalaysia
Clinical Trials on Split dose of 4L PEG
-
Air Force Military Medical University, ChinaCompleted
-
Kyunghee University Medical CenterHanyang University; Kangbuk Samsung HospitalCompleted
-
Shandong UniversityUnknownColonoscopy | Bowel PreparationChina
-
University of CalgaryUnknownColorectal CancerCanada
-
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaCompletedColonoscopy | Bowel Preparation | Hospitalized PatientsItaly
-
Alan BarkunPendopharmCompleted
-
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute...Terminated
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNot yet recruiting
-
The Cleveland ClinicCompleted