- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03370263
BENLYSTA® Special Drug Use Investigation
April 24, 2026 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline
BENLYSTA for Intravenous Injection / Subcutaneous Injection Special Drug Use Investigation
The objective of this study is to collect and assess the information about long-term safety and effectiveness of Benlysta for intravenous injection and Benlysta for subcutaneous injection (hereinafter referred to as "Benlysta") in daily clinical practice.
The aim of conducting this drug use investigation (DUI) in all subjects until data are accumulated from a certain number of subjects after Benlysta being marketed, data will be collected on safety and effectiveness of Benlysta in an early stage and thereby to take the necessary measures for proper use of Benlysta.
Approximately 600 subjects will be enrolled in to this study.
The observation period per subject will be 52 weeks from the start of Benlysta administration.
BENLYSTA is the registered trademark of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) group of companies.
Study Overview
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
1514
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hiroshima, Japan, 730-0001
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
The study will include all subjects to whom Benlysta is administered.
In addition, among subjects who start administration after launch, those to whom Benlysta has already administered before the conclusion of the contract and those who has already started administration at diagnosis, because of hospital transfer, etc. will be included as well.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The study will include all subjects to whom Benlysta is administered. In addition, among subjects who start administration after launch, those to whom Benlysta has already administered before the conclusion of the contract and those who has already started administration at diagnosis, because of hospital transfer, etc. will be included as well.
Exclusion Criteria:
- N/A
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Only
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Benlysta intravenous (IV)
Participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) received Benlysta via intravenous (IV) administration for 52 weeks as a part of their treatment regimen.
|
Benlysta was administered
|
|
Benlysta subcutaneous (SC)
Participants with SLE received Benlysta via subcutaneous (SC) administration for 52 weeks as a part of their treatment regimen.
|
Benlysta was administered
|
|
Benlysta switched from IV to SC or SC to IV
Participants with SLE received Benlysta for 52 weeks as a part of their treatment regimen, where initial administration was IV but switched to SC, or where the initial administration was SC but switched to IV during the study.
|
Benlysta was administered
|
|
Benlysta IV or SC (Initial route of administration unknown)
Participants with SLE received Benlysta via IV or SC administration for 52 weeks as a part of their treatment regimen.
It was unknown whether the initial administration was IV or SC for participants in this arm.
|
Benlysta was administered
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)
Time Frame: From the start of the study intervention (Day 1) up to maximum of 3 years
|
ADR is defined as a response to a drug which is noxious and unintended, and which occurred at doses normally used in human for the prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy of disease, or for the modifications of physiological function.
|
From the start of the study intervention (Day 1) up to maximum of 3 years
|
|
Number of Participants With Serious ADR of Events Defined as a Priority Study Matter
Time Frame: From the start of the study intervention (Day 1) up to maximum of 3 years
|
ADR is defined as a response to a drug which is noxious and unintended, and which occurred at doses normally used in human for the prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy of disease, or for the modifications of physiological function.
Following serious ADRs were considered as priority study matter: 1. Serious hypersensitivity, 2. Serious infections (including tuberculosis, pneumonia, pneumocystis pneumonia, sepsis, and opportunistic infection), 3. Reactivation of hepatitis B virus, 4. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, 5. Interstitial pneumonitis, 6. Malignant tumor, 7. Depression and events related to suicide/self-injury.
|
From the start of the study intervention (Day 1) up to maximum of 3 years
|
|
Change From Baseline in Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA SLEDAI) Score at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
The SELENA-SLEDAI score is a cumulative and weighted index for assessing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity in participants with SLE.
It consists of 24 disease descriptors related to signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment across 9 organ systems.
Each descriptor is assigned a weighted score (8 descriptors with a weight of 8 each, 6 descriptors with a weight of 4 each, 7 descriptors with a weight of 2 each, and 3 descriptors with a weight of 1 each) which is added up if the descriptor is observed during a visit or within the preceding 10 days.
The total score ranges from 0 (no disease activity) to 105 (all 24 descriptors present simultaneously).
A higher score indicates a more significant degree of disease activity.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
|
Change From Baseline in SELENA SLEDAI Score at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
The SELENA-SLEDAI score is a cumulative and weighted index for assessing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity in participants with SLE.
It consists of 24 disease descriptors related to signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment across 9 organ systems.
Each descriptor is assigned a weighted score (8 descriptors with a weight of 8 each, 6 descriptors with a weight of 4 each, 7 descriptors with a weight of 2 each, and 3 descriptors with a weight of 1 each) which is added up if the descriptor is observed during a visit or within the preceding 10 days.
The total score ranges from 0 (no disease activity) to 105 (all 24 descriptors present simultaneously).
A higher score indicates a more significant degree of disease activity.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Lupus Impact Tracker Score at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
Lupus impact tracker is 10-item patient reported outcome tool to measure impact of systemic lupus erythematosus or its treatment on participants' daily lives.
Each answer for items is marked from 0 (none of the time) to 4 (all of the time) points.
Lower the lupus impact score, less impact lupus is having on life of participant.
Total score was derived by adding up scores of all 10 items.
Total score ranges from 0 (less impact on daily life) to 40 (greater impact on daily life).
Higher score indicates greater impact of lupus on quality of life.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Lupus Impact Tracker Score at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
Lupus impact tracker is 10-item patient reported outcome tool to measure impact of systemic lupus erythematosus or its treatment on participants' daily lives.
Each answer for items is marked from 0 (none of the time) to 4 (all of the time) points.
Lower the lupus impact score, less impact lupus is having on life of participant.
Total score was derived by adding up scores of all 10 items.
Total score ranges from 0 (less impact on daily life) to 40 (greater impact on daily life).
Higher score indicates greater impact of lupus on quality of life.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
The PGA is used to assess the participant's current disease activity by investigator.
It was collected on a 10 centimeter (cm) visual analogue scale (VAS).
The score ranges from 0 (no activity) to 3 (severe activity).
Lower score means no disease activity, higher score means severe disease activity.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
|
Change From Baseline in PGA Score at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
The PGA is used to assess the participant's current disease activity by investigator.
It was collected on a 10 centimeter (cm) visual analogue scale (VAS).
The score ranges from 0 (no activity) to 3 (severe activity).
Lower score means no disease activity, higher score means severe disease activity.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 4
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 4
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 8
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 8
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 12
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 12
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 16
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 16
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 20
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 20
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 20
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 28
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 28
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 32
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 32
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 32
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 36
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 36
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 36
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 40
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 40
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 40
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 44
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 44
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 44
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 48
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 48
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Response Criteria at Week 24
Time Frame: At Week 24
|
LLDAS was defined as a state which, if sustained, was associated with a low likelihood of adverse outcome, considering disease activity and medication safety.
The LLDAS response criteria were: (1) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) less than equal to (<=)4 and no major active organ involvement (renal, central nervous system, cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, and pyrexia) and without hemolytic anemia or active gastrointestinal lesions; (2) no new signs or symptoms as compared to the last SELENA-SLEDAI assessment; (3) PGA score <=1 (33 millimeter); (4) corticosteroid dose <=7.5 milligram (mg)/day at time of assessment; and (5) use of the same immunosuppressant as compared with prior medication.
No unapproved immunosuppressant drugs like rituximab, anifrolumab, ustekinumab, or baricitinib were used as concomitant medications.
|
At Week 24
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved LLDAS Response Criteria at Week 52
Time Frame: At Week 52
|
LLDAS was defined as a state which, if sustained, was associated with a low likelihood of adverse outcome, considering disease activity and medication safety.
The LLDAS response criteria were: (1) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) less than equal to (<=)4 and no major active organ involvement (renal, central nervous system, cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, and pyrexia) and without hemolytic anemia or active gastrointestinal lesions; (2) no new signs or symptoms as compared to the last SELENA-SLEDAI assessment; (3) PGA score <=1 (33 millimeter); (4) corticosteroid dose <=7.5 milligram (mg)/day at time of assessment; and (5) use of the same immunosuppressant as compared with prior medication.
No unapproved immunosuppressant drugs like rituximab, anifrolumab, ustekinumab, or baricitinib were used as concomitant medications.
|
At Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Levels of Anti-double-stranded Deoxyribonucleic Acid (Anti-dsDNA) Antibody at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
Blood samples were collected for anti-dsDNA antibody biomarker analysis.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Levels of Anti-dsDNA Antibody at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
Blood samples were collected for anti-dsDNA antibody biomarker analysis.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Levels of Complement Component-3 (C3) and Complement Component-4 (C4) at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
Blood samples were collected from participants to assess C3 and C4 levels.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Levels of Complement Component-3 (C3) and Complement Component-4 (C4) at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
Blood samples were collected from participants to assess C3 and C4 levels.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Levels of Complement Hemolytic Activity at 50% (CH50) at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
Blood samples were collected from participants to assess CH50 concentrations.
CH50 is a blood test that measures the overall activity of the complement system, a group of proteins crucial for the immune system's function.
Low CH50 levels can be associated with certain infections.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Levels of Complement Hemolytic Activity at 50% (CH50) at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
Blood samples were collected from participants to assess CH50 concentrations.
CH50 is a blood test that measures the overall activity of the complement system, a group of proteins crucial for the immune system's function.
Low CH50 levels can be associated with certain infections.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
Urine samples were collected from participants to assess Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio.
It is a test that estimates how much protein is being excreted in urine, normalized to creatinine.
It's commonly used to assess kidney function and detect proteinuria.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
Urine samples were collected from participants to assess Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio.
It is a test that estimates how much protein is being excreted in urine, normalized to creatinine.
It's commonly used to assess kidney function and detect proteinuria.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials, GlaxoSmithKline
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 15, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 31, 2025
Study Completion (Actual)
July 31, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 6, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 6, 2017
First Posted (Actual)
December 12, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 18, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 24, 2026
Last Verified
April 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 207735
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
-
SanofiCompletedCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus-Systemic Lupus ErythematosusJapan
-
DualityBio Inc.RecruitingSystemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) or Cutaneous Lupus ErythematosusUnited States, Australia
-
LiveKidney.BioMedical University of South Carolina; Galilee CBRRecruitingSystemic Lupus Erythematosus | SLE | Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) | Lupus | Systemic Lupus ErthematosusUnited States
-
Ventus Therapeutics U.S., Inc.RecruitingSystemic Lupus Erythematosus | SLE | Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (CLE) | CLE | SLE (Systemic Lupus)United States, France, South Africa, Bulgaria, Georgia, Hungary, Poland, Spain
-
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, GermanyRecruitingSystemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) | Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (CLE)United States
-
Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.Active, not recruitingHealthy Volunteers | Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) | Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (CLE)Japan, South Korea
-
Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China; Hunan Provincial Natural Science... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus | Systemic Lupus Erythematosus RashChina
-
Base Therapeutics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingRefractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
-
Sohag UniversityRecruitingSystemic Lupus Erythematosus DiseaseEgypt
-
Wuhan Union Hospital, ChinaNot yet recruitingSystemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)China
Clinical Trials on Benlysta
-
Leiden University Medical CenterGlaxoSmithKlineNot yet recruiting
-
University Health Network, TorontoGlaxoSmithKlineRecruiting
-
GlaxoSmithKlineRecruitingLung Diseases, InterstitialUnited States, Australia, France, Japan, Spain, United Kingdom, Mexico, Belgium, Greece, Netherlands, China, Argentina, Canada, Italy, Brazil, Germany, Panama, South Korea
-
National University Hospital, SingaporeGlaxoSmithKlineRecruiting
-
RenJi HospitalCompleted
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamGlaxoSmithKlineCompletedChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | EmphysemaUnited States
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalCompleted
-
Washington University School of MedicineGlaxoSmithKline; American Cancer Society, Inc.CompletedGraft Vs Host Disease | Graft-versus-host-diseaseUnited States
-
Oklahoma Medical Research FoundationGlaxoSmithKlineUnknownSystemic Lupus ErythematosusUnited States