- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk forsøg NCT03370263
BENLYSTA® Undersøgelse af særlig lægemiddelbrug
24. april 2026 opdateret af: GlaxoSmithKline
BENLYSTA til intravenøs injektion / subkutan injektion Undersøgelse af særlig lægemiddelbrug
Formålet med denne undersøgelse er at indsamle og vurdere information om langsigtet sikkerhed og effektivitet af Benlysta til intravenøs injektion og Benlysta til subkutan injektion (herefter benævnt "Benlysta") i daglig klinisk praksis.
Formålet med at gennemføre denne undersøgelse af lægemiddelbrug (DUI) i alle forsøgspersoner, indtil data er akkumuleret fra et vist antal forsøgspersoner, efter at Benlysta er blevet markedsført, vil data blive indsamlet om sikkerhed og effektivitet af Benlysta på et tidligt tidspunkt og derved træffe de nødvendige foranstaltninger for korrekt brug af Benlysta.
Cirka 600 forsøgspersoner vil blive tilmeldt denne undersøgelse.
Observationsperioden pr. forsøgsperson vil være 52 uger fra starten af Benlysta-administrationen.
BENLYSTA er et registreret varemærke tilhørende GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) gruppe af virksomheder.
Studieoversigt
Status
Afsluttet
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Undersøgelsestype
Observationel
Tilmelding (Faktiske)
1514
Kontakter og lokationer
Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.
Studiesteder
-
-
-
Hiroshima, Japan, 730-0001
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
- Barn
- Voksen
- Ældre voksen
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Ingen
Prøveudtagningsmetode
Sandsynlighedsprøve
Studiebefolkning
Undersøgelsen vil omfatte alle forsøgspersoner, som Benlysta administreres til.
Herudover vil blandt forsøgspersoner, der påbegynder administration efter lancering, også inkluderes dem, som Benlysta allerede har administreret til før kontraktindgåelse, og dem, der allerede er påbegyndt administration ved diagnose, på grund af sygehusoverførsel mv.
Beskrivelse
Inklusionskriterier:
- Undersøgelsen vil omfatte alle forsøgspersoner, som Benlysta administreres til. Herudover vil blandt forsøgspersoner, der påbegynder administration efter lancering, også inkluderes dem, som Benlysta allerede har administreret til før kontraktindgåelse, og dem, der allerede er påbegyndt administration ved diagnose, på grund af sygehusoverførsel mv.
Ekskluderingskriterier:
- N/A
Studieplan
Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Observationsmodeller: Kun etui
- Tidsperspektiver: Fremadrettet
Kohorter og interventioner
Gruppe / kohorte |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Benlysta intravenous (IV)
Participants with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) received Benlysta via intravenous (IV) administration for 52 weeks as a part of their treatment regimen.
|
Benlysta was administered
|
|
Benlysta subcutaneous (SC)
Participants with SLE received Benlysta via subcutaneous (SC) administration for 52 weeks as a part of their treatment regimen.
|
Benlysta was administered
|
|
Benlysta switched from IV to SC or SC to IV
Participants with SLE received Benlysta for 52 weeks as a part of their treatment regimen, where initial administration was IV but switched to SC, or where the initial administration was SC but switched to IV during the study.
|
Benlysta was administered
|
|
Benlysta IV or SC (Initial route of administration unknown)
Participants with SLE received Benlysta via IV or SC administration for 52 weeks as a part of their treatment regimen.
It was unknown whether the initial administration was IV or SC for participants in this arm.
|
Benlysta was administered
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)
Tidsramme: From the start of the study intervention (Day 1) up to maximum of 3 years
|
ADR is defined as a response to a drug which is noxious and unintended, and which occurred at doses normally used in human for the prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy of disease, or for the modifications of physiological function.
|
From the start of the study intervention (Day 1) up to maximum of 3 years
|
|
Number of Participants With Serious ADR of Events Defined as a Priority Study Matter
Tidsramme: From the start of the study intervention (Day 1) up to maximum of 3 years
|
ADR is defined as a response to a drug which is noxious and unintended, and which occurred at doses normally used in human for the prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy of disease, or for the modifications of physiological function.
Following serious ADRs were considered as priority study matter: 1. Serious hypersensitivity, 2. Serious infections (including tuberculosis, pneumonia, pneumocystis pneumonia, sepsis, and opportunistic infection), 3. Reactivation of hepatitis B virus, 4. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, 5. Interstitial pneumonitis, 6. Malignant tumor, 7. Depression and events related to suicide/self-injury.
|
From the start of the study intervention (Day 1) up to maximum of 3 years
|
|
Change From Baseline in Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA SLEDAI) Score at Week 24
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
The SELENA-SLEDAI score is a cumulative and weighted index for assessing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity in participants with SLE.
It consists of 24 disease descriptors related to signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment across 9 organ systems.
Each descriptor is assigned a weighted score (8 descriptors with a weight of 8 each, 6 descriptors with a weight of 4 each, 7 descriptors with a weight of 2 each, and 3 descriptors with a weight of 1 each) which is added up if the descriptor is observed during a visit or within the preceding 10 days.
The total score ranges from 0 (no disease activity) to 105 (all 24 descriptors present simultaneously).
A higher score indicates a more significant degree of disease activity.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
|
Change From Baseline in SELENA SLEDAI Score at Week 52
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
The SELENA-SLEDAI score is a cumulative and weighted index for assessing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity in participants with SLE.
It consists of 24 disease descriptors related to signs and symptoms, laboratory tests, and physician's assessment across 9 organ systems.
Each descriptor is assigned a weighted score (8 descriptors with a weight of 8 each, 6 descriptors with a weight of 4 each, 7 descriptors with a weight of 2 each, and 3 descriptors with a weight of 1 each) which is added up if the descriptor is observed during a visit or within the preceding 10 days.
The total score ranges from 0 (no disease activity) to 105 (all 24 descriptors present simultaneously).
A higher score indicates a more significant degree of disease activity.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Lupus Impact Tracker Score at Week 24
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
Lupus impact tracker is 10-item patient reported outcome tool to measure impact of systemic lupus erythematosus or its treatment on participants' daily lives.
Each answer for items is marked from 0 (none of the time) to 4 (all of the time) points.
Lower the lupus impact score, less impact lupus is having on life of participant.
Total score was derived by adding up scores of all 10 items.
Total score ranges from 0 (less impact on daily life) to 40 (greater impact on daily life).
Higher score indicates greater impact of lupus on quality of life.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Lupus Impact Tracker Score at Week 52
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
Lupus impact tracker is 10-item patient reported outcome tool to measure impact of systemic lupus erythematosus or its treatment on participants' daily lives.
Each answer for items is marked from 0 (none of the time) to 4 (all of the time) points.
Lower the lupus impact score, less impact lupus is having on life of participant.
Total score was derived by adding up scores of all 10 items.
Total score ranges from 0 (less impact on daily life) to 40 (greater impact on daily life).
Higher score indicates greater impact of lupus on quality of life.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score at Week 24
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
The PGA is used to assess the participant's current disease activity by investigator.
It was collected on a 10 centimeter (cm) visual analogue scale (VAS).
The score ranges from 0 (no activity) to 3 (severe activity).
Lower score means no disease activity, higher score means severe disease activity.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
|
Change From Baseline in PGA Score at Week 52
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
The PGA is used to assess the participant's current disease activity by investigator.
It was collected on a 10 centimeter (cm) visual analogue scale (VAS).
The score ranges from 0 (no activity) to 3 (severe activity).
Lower score means no disease activity, higher score means severe disease activity.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 4
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 4
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 4
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 8
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 8
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 8
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 12
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 12
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 12
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 16
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 16
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 16
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 20
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 20
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 20
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 24
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 28
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 28
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 28
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 32
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 32
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 32
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 36
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 36
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 36
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 40
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 40
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 40
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 44
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 44
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 44
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 48
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 48
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 48
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Steroid Dose at Week 52
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
Mean daily steroid dose was calculated based on the prednisolone equivalent dose.
The average dose over the 7 days prior to and including the assessment date was used as mean daily steroid dose.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Percent change from Baseline was calculated by dividing change from Baseline value by Baseline value and multiplying it by 100.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Response Criteria at Week 24
Tidsramme: At Week 24
|
LLDAS was defined as a state which, if sustained, was associated with a low likelihood of adverse outcome, considering disease activity and medication safety.
The LLDAS response criteria were: (1) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) less than equal to (<=)4 and no major active organ involvement (renal, central nervous system, cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, and pyrexia) and without hemolytic anemia or active gastrointestinal lesions; (2) no new signs or symptoms as compared to the last SELENA-SLEDAI assessment; (3) PGA score <=1 (33 millimeter); (4) corticosteroid dose <=7.5 milligram (mg)/day at time of assessment; and (5) use of the same immunosuppressant as compared with prior medication.
No unapproved immunosuppressant drugs like rituximab, anifrolumab, ustekinumab, or baricitinib were used as concomitant medications.
|
At Week 24
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved LLDAS Response Criteria at Week 52
Tidsramme: At Week 52
|
LLDAS was defined as a state which, if sustained, was associated with a low likelihood of adverse outcome, considering disease activity and medication safety.
The LLDAS response criteria were: (1) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) less than equal to (<=)4 and no major active organ involvement (renal, central nervous system, cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, and pyrexia) and without hemolytic anemia or active gastrointestinal lesions; (2) no new signs or symptoms as compared to the last SELENA-SLEDAI assessment; (3) PGA score <=1 (33 millimeter); (4) corticosteroid dose <=7.5 milligram (mg)/day at time of assessment; and (5) use of the same immunosuppressant as compared with prior medication.
No unapproved immunosuppressant drugs like rituximab, anifrolumab, ustekinumab, or baricitinib were used as concomitant medications.
|
At Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Levels of Anti-double-stranded Deoxyribonucleic Acid (Anti-dsDNA) Antibody at Week 24
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
Blood samples were collected for anti-dsDNA antibody biomarker analysis.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Levels of Anti-dsDNA Antibody at Week 52
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
Blood samples were collected for anti-dsDNA antibody biomarker analysis.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Levels of Complement Component-3 (C3) and Complement Component-4 (C4) at Week 24
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
Blood samples were collected from participants to assess C3 and C4 levels.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Levels of Complement Component-3 (C3) and Complement Component-4 (C4) at Week 52
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
Blood samples were collected from participants to assess C3 and C4 levels.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Levels of Complement Hemolytic Activity at 50% (CH50) at Week 24
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
Blood samples were collected from participants to assess CH50 concentrations.
CH50 is a blood test that measures the overall activity of the complement system, a group of proteins crucial for the immune system's function.
Low CH50 levels can be associated with certain infections.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Levels of Complement Hemolytic Activity at 50% (CH50) at Week 52
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
Blood samples were collected from participants to assess CH50 concentrations.
CH50 is a blood test that measures the overall activity of the complement system, a group of proteins crucial for the immune system's function.
Low CH50 levels can be associated with certain infections.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio at Week 24
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
Urine samples were collected from participants to assess Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio.
It is a test that estimates how much protein is being excreted in urine, normalized to creatinine.
It's commonly used to assess kidney function and detect proteinuria.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio at Week 52
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
Urine samples were collected from participants to assess Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio.
It is a test that estimates how much protein is being excreted in urine, normalized to creatinine.
It's commonly used to assess kidney function and detect proteinuria.
Baseline was considered as Day 0 of the study.
Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 52
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.
Sponsor
Efterforskere
- Studieleder: GSK Clinical Trials, GlaxoSmithKline
Datoer for undersøgelser
Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
15. januar 2018
Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)
31. juli 2025
Studieafslutning (Faktiske)
31. juli 2025
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
6. december 2017
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
6. december 2017
Først opslået (Faktiske)
12. december 2017
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
18. maj 2026
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
24. april 2026
Sidst verificeret
1. april 2026
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- 207735
Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)
Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?
INGEN
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Ingen
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Ingen
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .
Kliniske forsøg med Systemisk lupus erythematosus
-
BiogenTilmelding efter invitationSubakut kutan lupus erythematosus | Kronisk kutan lupus erythematosusForenede Stater, Brasilien, Spanien, Taiwan, Canada, Frankrig, Tyskland, Japan, Italien, Colombia, Det Forenede Kongerige, Serbien, Chile, Filippinerne, Bulgarien, Kina, Sverige, Schweiz, Mexico, Sydkorea, Argentina, Ungarn, Slovakiet, Pole... og mere
-
BiogenRekrutteringSubakut kutan lupus erythematosus | Kronisk kutan lupus erythematosusForenede Stater, Japan, Taiwan, Belgien, Argentina, Chile, Ukraine, Kina, Spanien, Canada, Bulgarien, Italien, Ungarn, Serbien, Polen, Det Forenede Kongerige, Frankrig, Brasilien, Filippinerne, Schweiz, Saudi Arabien, Sverige, Tyskland, Mexi... og mere
-
SanofiAfsluttetKutan Lupus Erythematosus-Systemisk Lupus ErythematosusJapan
-
Immunovant Sciences GmbHAktiv, ikke rekrutterendeSubakut kutan lupus erythematosus | Kronisk kutan lupus erythematosusSerbien, Forenede Stater, Argentina, Bulgarien, Canada, Chile, Georgien, Tyskland, Grækenland, Polen, Puerto Rico, Spanien, Det Forenede Kongerige
-
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, GermanyIkke rekrutterer endnuKutan lupus erythematosus | Systemisk Lupus ErythematosusTyskland
-
Florida Academic Dermatology CentersUkendtDiscoid Lupus Erythematosus (DLE)Forenede Stater
-
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, GermanyRekrutteringSystemisk lupus erythematosus (SLE) | Kutan lupus erythematosus (CLE)Forenede Stater
-
Bristol-Myers SquibbAktiv, ikke rekrutterendeLupus Erythematosus, Discoid | Lupus erythematosus, subakut kutanMexico, Australien, Forenede Stater, Argentina, Frankrig, Tyskland, Polen, Taiwan
-
University of RochesterIncyte CorporationAfsluttetDiscoid Lupus ErythematosusForenede Stater
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNovartisTrukket tilbageDiscoid Lupus ErythematosusForenede Stater
Kliniske forsøg med Benlysta
-
Leiden University Medical CenterGlaxoSmithKlineIkke rekrutterer endnu
-
University Health Network, TorontoGlaxoSmithKlineRekruttering
-
GlaxoSmithKlineRekrutteringLungesygdomme, interstitielleForenede Stater, Australien, Frankrig, Japan, Spanien, Det Forenede Kongerige, Mexico, Belgien, Grækenland, Holland, Kina, Argentina, Canada, Italien, Brasilien, Tyskland, Panama, Sydkorea
-
Human Genome Sciences Inc.GlaxoSmithKlineAfsluttet
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamGlaxoSmithKlineAfsluttetKronisk obstruktiv lungesygdom | EmfysemForenede Stater
-
National University Hospital, SingaporeGlaxoSmithKlineRekruttering
-
RenJi HospitalAfsluttet
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalAfsluttet
-
GlaxoSmithKlineRekrutteringSystemisk lupus erythematosusForenede Stater, Spanien, Grækenland, Brasilien, Argentina, Japan, Portugal, Italien, Mexico, Tyskland, Frankrig
-
Washington University School of MedicineGlaxoSmithKline; American Cancer Society, Inc.AfsluttetGraft vs værtssygdom | Graft-versus-host-sygdomForenede Stater