Non-technical Skills of Emergency Physicians in a Virtual Emergency Department (3D-QUAMU)

Nontechnical Skills Assessment of Emergency Physicians and Quality of Care in a Virtual Emergency Department

The investigators will study nontechnical skills of emergency physicians in a virtual standardized emergency room and their impact on quality of care.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Emergencies
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: observational

Detailed Description

The ability to manage multiple patients and anticipate the risk of error related to task interruptions or disruptions has been identified among relevant non-technical skills (NTS) for practicing emergency medicine. However, the link between these skills and the quality of care has not been quantified. NTS are usually analyzed by qualitative methods such as interviews, direct observations, or questionnaires that have low performance according to the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation).

The investigators have created and validated an experimental model of a virtual, authentic and realistic Emergency Department (ED). The platform has been modelled in a "Second Life" environment. The NTS of emergency physicians will be assessed and recorded during simulated care of multiple virtual patients. The NTS association with ED length of stay and disposition decision will be analyzed. This study will be an internal pilot study and will include 30 emergency physicians who practice emergency medicine for at least two years.

Sessions will be performed in the Toulouse Institute of Health Care Simulation, Toulouse University Hospital. They will be composed of three stages: briefing (30 minutes), simulated practice (3 hours), and debriefing with an explicit interview (30 minutes). Two researchers and a computer technician will supervise the sessions. The data will be obtained by analyzing the video recorded during the simulated practice and the interview.

• Study Type: Observational
• Enrollment (Actual): 30

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• France
  • Toulouse, France, 31059
    • CHU Toulouse

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Emergency physicians working in the French Midi-Pyrénées region

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Active emergency physicians working in an ED of the French Midi-Pyrenees region
• Two years of practice in emergency medicine or more
• Volunteer to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

• Emergency physician working in another setting than ED, outside the Midi-Pyrenees region, or practicing emergency medicine for less than 2 years.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Observational Models: Cohort
• Time Perspectives: Prospective

Number of groups / cohorts

1

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort	Intervention / Treatment
Emergency physicians; The observational group will be composed of emergency physicians working in the French Midi-Pyrenees region. Physicians must work since 2 years in emergency service	Other: observational; No intervention, it is observational study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Nontechnical skills	The nontechnical skills will be assessed by the Anaesthetists' Non-Technical Skills (ANTS) system.	3 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Quality of care will be measured by a composite criteria (process and result)	Quality of care will be measured by a composite criterion associating a process indicator and a result indicator : The process indicator is the average time to medical care of patients; The result indicator corresponds to the relevance of the choice of the orientation of each patient by the emergency doctor at the end of medical care	3 hours
ED length of stay	The quality of care will be assessed by ED length of stay : ED length of stay will be measured from triage completion to disposition decision	3 hours
The authenticity of the virtual emergency medicine service	Evaluation of the consistency : perceived internal consistency in the proposed rules and situations will be assessed using a 4-item questionnaire by answering yes or no	3 hours
The authenticity of the virtual emergency medicine service	Evaluation of the realism (the assumed resemblance with a real life reference) will be evaluated through a questionnaire containing 3 areas of comparison between the virtual and real environment (layout of the premises, duration of the actions, staff / patient ratio) with as answer possible for each comparison: Realistic or not realistic.	3 hours
The authenticity of the virtual emergency medicine service	Evaluation of the relevance (necessary to allow users to take ownership of the problems posed by the designers) will be assessed through direct observation with a yes / no evaluation of the acceptance to use the virtual environment, to test the environment, to make choices during the scenario and to control the environment.	3 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University Hospital, Toulouse
• Investigators: Study Chair: Dominique Lauque, MD, Toulouse Chu

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): June 1, 2018
• Primary Completion (Actual): September 1, 2019
• Study Completion (Actual): December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: June 8, 2017
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 23, 2018
• First Posted (Actual): March 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): February 3, 2022
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 2, 2022
• Last Verified: February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: simulation; serious game; virtual emergency department; nontechnical skills
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pathologic Processes; Disease Attributes; Emergencies
• Other Study ID Numbers: RC 31/16/8763

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No