Quality of Incoming Call Handling in an Emergency Dispatch Center (CRRAQPA)

Evaluation of the Quality of Incoming Call Handling Assisted by the proQA Software in the Emergency Dispatch Center of Besançon.

The aim of Emergency Medical Dispatch (EMD) is to ensure prompt access to medical care for all at all times, initiate appropriate responses quickly, arrange suitable hospital facilities, and coordinate patient transport and hospitalization.

In France, care begins with an incoming call managed by the EM Dispatchers, who collect the patient's details and assess the seriousness of the situation. This severity assessment is essential for triggering the appropriate resources: direct dispatch of first-aiders in extreme emergencies, or transfer of the call to an emergency or general practitioner.

Under- or over-assessment will necessitate redirection, resulting in a loss of time and opportunity for the patient, or emergency channel congestion. Errors at this stage can impact the entire care pathway.

To assist EM dispatchers, aids have been developed. Firstly, In France, a diploma course was created in 2019. Various training methods exist. Their contribution to the quality of incoming calls handling remains unevaluated. Secondly, EM centers use regulation protocols designed to guide dispatchers in call handling and identifying the seriousness of the situation.

The regulation protocol used at Besançon University Hospital is ProQA (Priority Dispatch Corporation, Salt Lake City, UT, US). It uses standardized questions and records EM Dispatchers' decisions and the responses they obtain from callers. These responses are considered by ProQA, which then assigns a "severity" code to the call.

The assistance provided by regulation protocols, however useful, remains insufficient. Contextual factors can complicate compliance with regulation protocols, making matching resources to needs challenging.

AQUA is a software package dedicated to quality control, enabling EM Dispatcher's supervisors to rate the quality of all stages of the call-taking process. This ensures that all key questions have been asked and that they have been asked correctly. In addition, the 'severity' code obtained by the EM Dispatcher can be compared with the 'severity' code obtained by the supervisor, using a qualifying analysis method and data entry software. The calls are replayed under optimal conditions, in a calm environment and allowing supervisors to listen multiple times to ensure no information is missed. the supervisors' code is therefore the reference code.

CRRAQPA study's aim is to assess the quality of incoming call handling and to identify the factors that influence this quality.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

800

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

We will study incoming calls in the EMD of Besançon University Hospital. These calls must be handled by a professional EM dispatcher and must have a 'severity' code that is not unfounded.

During the replay and evaluation, it can happen that the supervisor is unable to assign a severity code with certainty. This occurs when a decisive question regarding the severity code has not been asked, and the information has not been provided spontaneously by the caller. In such cases, the supervisor considers the code obtained by the EMD to be unfounded

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Calls handled by a professional EM Dispatcher during the study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Calls handled by a medical student functioning as an EM Dispatcher.
  • Calls for which the "severity" code is unfounded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of incoming calls for which the 'severity' code identified by the EM dispatchers during the call and the 'severity' code identified by the supervisor after replaying the call are in agreement.
Time Frame: Through study completion, the anticipated duration is 1 year

The quality of the incoming call will be assessed based on the agreement between the 'severity' code identified by the EM dispatchers during the call and the 'severity' code identified by the supervisor after replaying the call using the AQUA software.

There are six possible severity codes, which will be grouped into a three-category variables corresponding to the three possible referrals (emergency physician, general practitioner, 'flash' departure).

Through study completion, the anticipated duration is 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of over- and under-rated calls.
Time Frame: Through study completion, the anticipated duration is 1 year

An over-rated call occurs when the severity level identified by the EM dispatcher is higher than that identified by the supervisor upon replay.

An under-rated call occurs when the severity level identified by the EM dispatcher is lower than that identified by the supervisor upon replay

Through study completion, the anticipated duration is 1 year
The proportion of the different training modalities received by EM dispatchers.
Time Frame: Through study completion, the anticipated duration is 1 year
In France, several training modalities exist for EM dispatchers such as field training, 2019 diploma training, training via tape replay, call simulation training.
Through study completion, the anticipated duration is 1 year
The number of years of experience in the profession of the EM dispatchers participating in the study.
Time Frame: Through study completion, the anticipated duration is 1 year
Through study completion, the anticipated duration is 1 year
The rate of answered calls within 20 s (= quality of service at 20 seconds, QS20)
Time Frame: Through study completion, the anticipated duration is 1 year
Through study completion, the anticipated duration is 1 year
The number of calls per hour in the call centre.
Time Frame: Through study completion, the anticipated duration is 1 year
Through study completion, the anticipated duration is 1 year
The duration between the beginning of the EM dispatcher's shift and the time at which the incoming call occurs
Time Frame: Through study completion, the anticipated duration is 1 year
Through study completion, the anticipated duration is 1 year
The proportion of incoming calls occurring during the day or night
Time Frame: Through study completion, the anticipated duration is 1 year
Through study completion, the anticipated duration is 1 year
The proportion of incoming call occuring during week days or week-ends
Time Frame: Through study completion, the anticipated duration is 1 year
Through study completion, the anticipated duration is 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Antoine Leclerc, University Hospital of Besancon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023/833

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data in this study are not publicly available, but reasonable requests can be made.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Immediately following publication. No end date

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers who submit a methodologically sound proposal approved by our research team

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Medical Emergencies

Subscribe