Interest of Simulation as Part of the Procedure Tracheobronchial Aspiration (SIMREAL)

March 30, 2018 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse

Interest of High Fidelity Simulation Training Beginning as Part of the Procedure Tracheobronchial Aspiration

The aim of this study is to compare a control group (Practical Work Group) with a High fidelity Stimulation group about competences and reasoning clinic.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Health simulation is in full development on the national territory (France). The medical profession and nurses use this mode of learning in initial training to improve the students skills The report of Pr Granry allowed an inventory of the simulation in France with as Leitmotiv "never the first time for the patient". It has also put in place priorities for the coming years, one of which is to develop simulation in initial and in-service training. This learning technique is interesting according to several parameters. First,is the safety of care. A novice who has already practiced on a mannequin or in the context of the simulation will be able to better understand the situation of care in the clinical field. The quality of care is also improved by the practice of simulation including communication skills, psychomotor skills, respect for procedures and theoretical knowledge. This more or less faithful reproduction is all the more necessary as the duration of clinical placements is decreasing. Simulation is a way to mitigate this lack is allows a faithful immersion in the care environment. Despite all these positive points, physiotherapy is not yet very affected by the simulation as shown in the literature Gordon's review (2015). Initial training, continuing education has not to this day largely developed this teaching method . Some timid uses have taken place and for the most part in Anglo-Saxon countries with various modes of simulation. In France, certainly linked to the specificity of the profession, its implementation is delicate, even complicated. It remains anecdotal to this day.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • University Hospital Toulouse

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Learners: All second year students enrolled in initial training of the Institute of kinesitherapy of Toulouse during the year 2017-2018. In total 45 students.
  • Patients :All adult patients with tracheotomy, and able to communicate. Patients hospitalized in the University Hospital de Toulouse

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Learners: Students absent on the day of the reading of the procedures
  • Patients:Adolescent patients, child patients, Patients with a communication deficit, Patients under respirators

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Practical Work
15 students who participate in a practical work lasting two hours about the procedures of the tracheobronchial aspiration

Reading of the procedures of the tracheobronchial aspiration (legislative framework, rules of hygiene, procedures, undesirable effects) The Practical Group participates in a practical work lasting two hours and the Stimulation Group is in simulation with a procedural practice of tracheobronchial suction as part of a simulation sequence. This group benefits from the methodology of the simulation with a part of briefing, a part simulated session and to finish the debriefing.

The experiment finished with a real activity on patients with tracheotomy with in this environment the reproduction of the procedure

Experimental: Stimulation Group
Group with competences and reasoning clinic 15 students Simulation with a procedural practice of tracheobronchial suction as part of a simulation sequence after reading the procedures of the tracheobronchial aspiration

Reading of the procedures of the tracheobronchial aspiration (legislative framework, rules of hygiene, procedures, undesirable effects) The Practical Group participates in a practical work lasting two hours and the Stimulation Group is in simulation with a procedural practice of tracheobronchial suction as part of a simulation sequence. This group benefits from the methodology of the simulation with a part of briefing, a part simulated session and to finish the debriefing.

The experiment finished with a real activity on patients with tracheotomy with in this environment the reproduction of the procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the acquisition of the skills of a tracheobronchial aspiration procedure
Time Frame: Two hours
Evaluate the acquisition of the skills of a tracheobronchial aspiration procedure by an audit grid learning according to two different groups (Stimulation group and Practical Work group), on a learner population in initial formation of Institut physiotherapy.
Two hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the components of clinical reasoning : self-confrontation and simulation
Time Frame: Two hours
Compare the components of clinical reasoning in different training typologies : practical work by using simple self-confrontation and simulation The simulation is filmed to watch the action of the learner after with him and bring out the implicit part of the student's clinical reasoning during the performance of the act (self-confrontation).
Two hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Didier Alain, MD, University Hospital, Toulouse

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 13, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 13, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

January 13, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RC31/17/0156
  • 2017-A01609-44 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tracheobronchial Anomalies

Clinical Trials on The tracheobronchial aspiration

Subscribe