- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03551509
LifeNet: Extracellular Matrix Graft in Rotator Cuff Repair
Extracellular Matrix Scaffold Graft Augmentation in Rotator Cuff Repair: a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of an ECM scaffold graft to augment repair of a large/massive rotator cuff tear. The study will involve 70 patients. 35 patients will be randomly assigned to each arm of the study.
Despite advances in surgical technology, repairs of large (3-5 cm) and massive (>5 cm) rotator cuff tears (RCT) fail between 20%-90% of the time [1]. Due to their size and increased structural involvement, large or massive RCT present a substantial challenge to orthopaedic surgeons. [16] The repairs tend to fail at the suture-tendon junction, which is due to several factors, including tension at the repair and quality of the tendon [1-2,5]. Full thickness tears are uncommon in younger patients, especially those less than forty years old and are usually traumatic in etiology. Younger patients also typically fair better following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with fewer failures and more successful return to pre-injury level of function [16]. One strategy to augment repair of large to massive rotator cuff tears has been the development of biological scaffold materials, which are composed of extracellular matrix (ECM). The ECM composing the scaffolds are made from a number of tissues, including, but not limited to, small intestinal submucosa (SIS), dermis, and pericardium [3]. Studies to date include both prospective and retrospective in animal and human models, and include Restore, a porcine-derived SIS by DePuy Orthopaedics, GraftJacket, a human-derived, non-cross-linked dermis graft by Wright Medical Technology, and Zimmer Collagen Repair, a cross-linked porcine derived dermal graft made by Zimmer. Restore studies have shown no benefit and some even an increase in repair failure with recommendations not to use to augment repair. GraftJacket studies have shown a reduction in graft failure; however, several of the Restore and GraftJacket studies are limited by a lack of a control cohort. The Zimmer graft studies have conflicting results with both an improvement and no improvement in failure rates of repair. The prior studies listed are all in vivo; however, the majority are not randomized trials and thus do not have a control with which to compare data. In addition, some trials include open repairs. A lack of prospective, randomized, controlled, in vivo trials exist that evaluate the ability of the ECM scaffold graft augmentation in large to massive arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs to decrease the failure rate.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Ashley Valdes, BS
- Phone Number: (954)299-5000
- Email: valdesa4@ccf.org
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Weston, Florida, United States, 33331
- Cleveland Clinic Florida
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a large (3-5 cm) to massive (>5 cm) rotator cuff tear who will be undergoing open or arthroscopic repair. The cuff tear size will be determined on pre-operative MRI and US.
- Patients who are willing and able to provide written informed consent for their involvement in the study.
- Patients who meet criteria for RCR surgery
- Patients older than 18 years of age
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with addiction to illegal drugs, solvents or alcohol who are actively using or have previously attempted and failed a treatment program.
- Patients with bacteremia, a systemic infection, or infection of the surgical site.
- All those who are prisoners.
- Patients who are pregnant or nursing.
- All those with a condition that may limit a patient's ability to finalize the study or that may cause an undue risk to the patient's health and well-being.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Control Group
Patients randomly assigned into the control group will undergo open or arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using the surgeon's standard practice.
No ECM graft will be used.
|
|
Active Comparator: Treatment Group
Patients randomly assigned into the treatment group will undergo open or arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and the surgeon will use the ArthroFLEX® ECM graft to augment the repair.
ECM scaffold grafts are indicated for the reinforcement of soft tissues repaired by sutures or suture anchors during tendon repair surgery, including rotator cuff.
|
In patients receiving a graft, thru mini open technique the lateral portal incision will be extended vertically approximately 5-6 cm.
A standard, deltoid-splitting, mini-open approach will then be performed, leaving the deltoid attachment to the acromion intact.
For arthroscopic technique same method of fixation will be used below.
The dermis graft will be sized and cut so as to cover the entire repair site in both medial-lateral and anterior-posterior dimensions.
This group will undergo rotator cuff repair surgery, but will not receive the ECM scaffold graft.
Other Names:
|
Other: Crossover Group
Patients initially randomized to the control arm who cannot be repaired without an augmented graft will be followed for safety and remain in the study and put into a group for the intention to treat.
|
This group will undergo rotator cuff repair surgery, but will not receive the ECM scaffold graft.
Other Names:
Patients randomized to the control arm who cannot be repaired without an augmented graft will be followed for safety and remain in the study and put into a group for the intention to treat.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Tendon healing
Time Frame: As assessed 1 year postoperatively.
|
Success as defined by tendon healing after rotator cuff repair, as indicated based on MRI.
|
As assessed 1 year postoperatively.
|
Comparison of healing by MRI vs US
Time Frame: As assessed 1 year postoperatively.
|
Comparison of tendon healing will be assessed using US imaging modalities versus MRI.
|
As assessed 1 year postoperatively.
|
Progress of tendon healing
Time Frame: As assessed at 1 year postoperatively.
|
Progress of tendon healing based on US will be used as predictive data for 1 year success (based on primary outcome)
|
As assessed at 1 year postoperatively.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Patient Outcomes: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Shoulder Score (ASES)
Time Frame: Through study completion (1 year after surgery). Specifically this assessment will be administered one time before surgery (during the preoperative examination) and then at every follow-up visit thereafter (6 wks, 3 mos, 6 mos, and 1 year after surgery).
|
The ASES is standardized form for assessment of the shoulder.
There are patient-self-evaluation and physician assessment sections.
The patient self-evaluation section form contains visual analog scales for pain and instability and an activities of daily living questionnaire.
The activities of daily living questionnaire is marked on a four-point ordinal scale that can be converted to a cumulative activities of daily living index.
The physician assessment section assesses range of motion, specific physical signs, strength, and stability.
A shoulder score can be derived from the visual analogue scale score for pain (50%) and the cumulative activities of daily living score (50%).
|
Through study completion (1 year after surgery). Specifically this assessment will be administered one time before surgery (during the preoperative examination) and then at every follow-up visit thereafter (6 wks, 3 mos, 6 mos, and 1 year after surgery).
|
Patient Outcomes: The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC)
Time Frame: Through study completion (1 year after surgery). Specifically this assessment will be administered one time before surgery (during the preoperative examination) and then at every follow-up visit thereafter (6 wks, 3 mos, 6 mos, and 1 year after surgery).
|
A disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for patients with rotator cuff disease.
Patients will respond to by marking a scale with ranges between none and extreme.
Information collected includes physical symptoms, such as pain and weakness levels in the shoulder, the impact of the patient's shoulder injury on their sports/recreational activities, work (inside or outside of the home), lifestyle/activities of daily living (ADL), and its emotional impact, such as frustration level, depression, and any worry/concern a patient might be about how their injury might affect their occupation.
|
Through study completion (1 year after surgery). Specifically this assessment will be administered one time before surgery (during the preoperative examination) and then at every follow-up visit thereafter (6 wks, 3 mos, 6 mos, and 1 year after surgery).
|
Patient Outcomes: Measurement of Shoulder Activity Level
Time Frame: Through study completion (1 year after surgery). Specifically this assessment will be administered one time before surgery (during the preoperative examination) and then at every follow-up visit thereafter (6 wks, 3 mos, 6 mos, and 1 year after surgery).
|
This activity scale was developed using established principles: item generation, item reduction, pretesting, and reliability and validity testing.
The activity rating is a numerical sum of scores for five activities rated on a five-point frequency scale from never performed (0 points) to daily (4 points).
Patients were scored on the following criteria: carrying an object 8 lb or heavier by hand, handling objects overhead, weight training with arms, swinging motion (ie, hitting tennis or golf ball), and lifting objects 25 lb or heavier.
Two additional multiple choice questions provide a score assessing participation in contact and overhead sports.
It can be used in conjunction with patient-based measures of shoulder outcome to define patient populations for cohort studies, and to assess activity level as a prognostic factor in patients with shoulder disorders.
(Clin Orthop Relat Res.
2005 Oct;439:101-8.)
|
Through study completion (1 year after surgery). Specifically this assessment will be administered one time before surgery (during the preoperative examination) and then at every follow-up visit thereafter (6 wks, 3 mos, 6 mos, and 1 year after surgery).
|
Patient Outcomes: Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV)
Time Frame: Through study completion (1 year after surgery). Specifically this assessment will be administered one time before surgery (during the preoperative examination) and then at every follow-up visit thereafter (6 wks, 3 mos, 6 mos, and 1 year after surgery).
|
The SSV is defined as a patient's subjective shoulder assessment expressed as a percentage of an entirely normal shoulder, which would score 100%.
(J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
2007 Nov-Dec;16(6):717-21.)
|
Through study completion (1 year after surgery). Specifically this assessment will be administered one time before surgery (during the preoperative examination) and then at every follow-up visit thereafter (6 wks, 3 mos, 6 mos, and 1 year after surgery).
|
Patient Outcomes: Constant Score (CS)
Time Frame: Through study completion (1 year after surgery). Specifically this assessment will be administered one time before surgery (during the preoperative examination) and then at every follow-up visit thereafter (6 wks, 3 mos, 6 mos, and 1 year after surgery).
|
C Constant and A Murley.
This scoring system consists of four variables that are used to assess the function of the shoulder.
The right and left shoulders are assessed separately.
The subjective variables are pain and ADL (sleep, work, recreation / sport) which give a total of 35 points.
The objective variables are range of motion and strength which give a total of 65 points.
More information on the Constant Score can be found here: https://www.shoulderdoc.co.uk/article/9.
|
Through study completion (1 year after surgery). Specifically this assessment will be administered one time before surgery (during the preoperative examination) and then at every follow-up visit thereafter (6 wks, 3 mos, 6 mos, and 1 year after surgery).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gregory J Gilot, MD, Cleveland Clinic Florida
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Derwin KA, Badylak SF, Steinmann SP, Iannotti JP. Extracellular matrix scaffold devices for rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Apr;19(3):467-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.020. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
- Schlegel TF, Hawkins RJ, Lewis CW, Motta T, Turner AS. The effects of augmentation with Swine small intestine submucosa on tendon healing under tension: histologic and mechanical evaluations in sheep. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Feb;34(2):275-80. doi: 10.1177/0363546505279912. Epub 2005 Oct 6.
- Badylak SF, Freytes DO, Gilbert TW. Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: Structure and function. Acta Biomater. 2009 Jan;5(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.09.013. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
- Sclamberg SG, Tibone JE, Itamura JM, Kasraeian S. Six-month magnetic resonance imaging follow-up of large and massive rotator cuff repairs reinforced with porcine small intestinal submucosa. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct;13(5):538-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.03.005.
- Iannotti JP, Codsi MJ, Kwon YW, Derwin K, Ciccone J, Brems JJ. Porcine small intestine submucosa augmentation of surgical repair of chronic two-tendon rotator cuff tears. A randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jun;88(6):1238-44. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00524.
- Walton JR, Bowman NK, Khatib Y, Linklater J, Murrell GA. Restore orthobiologic implant: not recommended for augmentation of rotator cuff repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):786-91. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00315.
- Zheng MH, Chen J, Kirilak Y, Willers C, Xu J, Wood D. Porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) is not an acellular collagenous matrix and contains porcine DNA: possible implications in human implantation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005 Apr;73(1):61-7. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30170.
- Bond JL, Dopirak RM, Higgins J, Burns J, Snyder SJ. Arthroscopic replacement of massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears using a GraftJacket allograft: technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy. 2008 Apr;24(4):403-409.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.07.033.
- Badhe SP, Lawrence TM, Smith FD, Lunn PG. An assessment of porcine dermal xenograft as an augmentation graft in the treatment of extensive rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Jan-Feb;17(1 Suppl):35S-39S. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.08.005.
- Soler JA, Gidwani S, Curtis MJ. Early complications from the use of porcine dermal collagen implants (Permacol) as bridging constructs in the repair of massive rotator cuff tears. A report of 4 cases. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007 Aug;73(4):432-6.
- Brophy RH, Beauvais RL, Jones EC, Cordasco FA, Marx RG. Measurement of shoulder activity level. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Oct;439:101-8. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000173255.85016.1f.
- Parnes N, Bartoszewski NR, Defranco MJ. Arthroscopic Repair of Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears in Active Patients Younger Than 40 Years: 2- to 5-Year Clinical Outcomes. Orthopedics. 2018 Jan 1;41(1):e52-e57. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20171114-02. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
- Chung SW, Kim JY, Kim MH, Kim SH, Oh JH. Arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears: outcome and analysis of factors associated with healing failure or poor postoperative function. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1674-83. doi: 10.1177/0363546513485719. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
- Greenspoon JA, Petri M, Warth RJ, Millett PJ. Massive rotator cuff tears: pathomechanics, current treatment options, and clinical outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Sep;24(9):1493-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Jun 28.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- FLA 18-008
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Tear
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityNot yet recruitingRotator Cuff Tears | Partial Tear of Rotator CuffTurkey
-
Keele UniversityUniversity Hospitals, Leicester; Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation... and other collaboratorsWithdrawnTraumatic Rotator Cuff TearUnited Kingdom
-
Rush University Medical CenterSmith & Nephew, Inc.CompletedRotator Cuff Tear Repair Anchors
-
University of MichiganCompletedFull Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear
-
Johannes Kepler University of LinzCompletedFull Thickness Rotator Cuff TearAustria
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteCompleted
-
Orthofix Inc.TerminatedPEMF as Adjunctive Treatment Following Surgical Repair of Full Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears (RCStim)Full-thickness Rotator Cuff TearUnited States
-
InGeneron, Inc.CompletedRotator Cuff Tear - Partial ThicknessUnited States
-
Izmir Katip Celebi UniversityTerminatedPartial Thickness Rotator Cuff TearTurkey
-
BioMimetic TherapeuticsCompletedFull Thickness Rotator Cuff TearCanada
Clinical Trials on ArthroFLEX ECM scaffold graft
-
Miach OrthopaedicsActive, not recruiting
-
Novadip BiosciencesActive, not recruitingCongenital Pseudarthrosis of TibiaBelgium, United States
-
Diana Lee FarmerCalifornia Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM)RecruitingMyelomeningoceleUnited States