- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03560778
Comparisons of Urodynamic, Bladder Diary, Quality of Life Parameters Between OAB-wet and OAB-dry Female Patients (OAB)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Aims: To identify factors predicting the presence of OAB-wet and to further derive the underlying pathophysiology in OAB-wet vs. OAB-dry.
Methods: Between September 2007 and September 2013, the medical records of women with OAB who completed a 3-day bladder diary and underwent urodynamic studies in a tertiary referral center will be reviewed. OAB-wet will be diagnosed in patients who complained of at least one episode of urgency incontinence in the previous month; otherwise, OAB-dry is diagnosed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis will be used to predict the presence of OAB-wet.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The diagnosis of overactive bladder disease
- Female patient of more than 20 year-old
Exclusion Criteria:
- Dominant symptoms with stress urinary incontinence (SUI)
- Regular urethral catheterization or intermittent self-catheterization
- Urinary tract infection or chronic inflammation in the previous 2 weeks
- Bladder calculus
- A history of pelvic radiotherapy
- A preexisting malignant pelvic tumor.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Compare the difference of urodynamic parameters between OAB-wet and OAB-dry
Time Frame: 1 week
|
The variables of urodynamic study included maximum flow rate, average flow rate, voided volume, volume of strong to desire, detrusor pressure at maximum flow during voiding cystometry (PdetQmax), Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP), maximal urethral pressure (MUP), maximal urethral closure pressure (MUCP), functional profile length, urethral closure pressure area (UCPA), continence length, continence area, pressure transmission ratio (PTR) at MUP, and electromyography (EMG).
The urodynamic parameters will be interpreted together to get a complete urodynamic report and diagnosis, thus to compare the difference between OAB-wet and OAB-dry
|
1 week
|
|
Compare the difference of bladder diary parameters between OAB-wet and OAB-dry
Time Frame: 1 week
|
The 3-day bladder diary parameters included maximum daytime voided volume excluding the morning void derived from 3-day bladder diaries (DVVmax), urgency episodes, urgency incontinence episodes, daytime frequency, nocturia, total voided volume and total water intake.
The bladder diary parameters will be interpreted together to get a complete report, such as urinary urgency and nocturia, thus to compare the difference between OAB-wet and OAB-dry
|
1 week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 201404012RINC
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.