Impact of Modifiable Psychosocial Factors on Veterans' Long-term Trajectories of Functioning and Quality of Life (SERVE:IMPACT)

October 22, 2024 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

The Impact of Modifiable Psychosocial Factors on Veterans' Long-term Trajectories of Functioning and Quality of Life: Promoting Recovery by Targeting Mindfulness and Psychological Flexibility

This study is Phase 3 of Project SERVE (Study Evaluating Returning Veterans' Experiences). Through two prior phases, SERVE has followed a cohort of post-9/11 Veterans since 2010 and has identified numerous risk and protective factors. SERVE's overall objective is to understand and improve the long-term functional outcomes of post-9/11 Veterans. Consistent with the investigators' conceptual model, the central hypothesis is that psychological flexibility and other trans-diagnostic treatment targets mediate the effects of the most common mental and physical wounds of war on long-term functioning and self-directed violence (i.e., suicide risk). Thus, integrated interventions specifically designed to improve functioning associated with these conditions are most likely to promote long-term recovery among the most impaired Veterans. The investigators will test the central hypothesis and accomplish the overall objective by pursuing the following specific aims:

Aim 1: Identify treatment targets that prospectively predict functional disability, family functioning and self-directed violence (SDV) in post-9/11 Veterans with PTSD, depression, chronic pain, TBI, and/or AUD.

To achieve this aim, the investigators will follow 500 Veterans for 2 years in order to prospectively evaluate the impact of several novel, treatment-relevant factors on functional disability and SDV over time.

H1: Novel factors (mindfulness, perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, and moral injury) along with established treatment targets (psychological flexibility, self-compassion, and emotion regulation) will prospectively predict functional disability and SDV after accounting for covariates.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Research by the investigators' team and others demonstrates that posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, alcohol use disorders (AUD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), and chronic pain frequently co-occur among post-9/11 war Veterans and are associated with functional impairment and suicide risk; however, no treatment currently exists that has been specifically designed to promote functional recovery among Veterans experiencing any combination of these most common mental and physical wounds of war. The investigative team has: (A) identified multiple modifiable psychosocial factors (emotion regulation, psychological flexibility, self-compassion) that prospectively predict impairment and suicidal ideation in Veterans; (B) characterized long-term trajectories of resilience and functional disability in Veterans; (C) determined that high utilization of VA mental health services appears to have little, if any, impact on the functional recovery of Veterans on the moderate and severely impaired trajectories; (D) identified psychological flexibility (i.e., the ability to remain present in the moment despite emotional distress and to persist in changing behavior in the pursuit of one's values and goals) as a unique, prospective predictor of membership in the severely impaired functional trajectory and of suicidal ideation, even after accounting for the effects of co-morbidity; and (E) demonstrated that Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)-a trans-diagnostic, mindfulness-based behavior therapy that seeks to improve functioning by targeting psychological flexibility -can lead to recovery, including sustained improvements in functional disability, quality of life (QoL), suicidal ideation, PTSD, and AUD symptoms among severely impaired Veterans with co-occurring PTSD-AUD.

This study is Phase 3 of Project SERVE (Study Evaluating Returning Veterans' Experiences). Through two prior RR&D MERIT awards, SERVE has followed a cohort of post-9/11 Veterans since 2010 and has identified numerous risk and protective factors. SERVE's overall objective is to understand and improve the long-term functional outcomes of post-9/11 Veterans. Consistent with the investigators' conceptual model, the central hypothesis is that psychological flexibility and other trans-diagnostic treatment targets mediate the effects of the most common mental and physical wounds of war on long-term functioning and self-directed violence (i.e., suicide risk). Thus, integrated interventions specifically designed to improve functioning associated with these conditions are most likely to promote long-term recovery among the most impaired Veterans. The investigators will test the central hypothesis and accomplish the overall objective by pursuing the following specific aims:

Aim 1: Identify treatment targets that prospectively predict functional disability, family functioning and self-directed violence (SDV) in post-9/11 Veterans with PTSD, depression, chronic pain, TBI, and/or AUD.

To achieve this aim, the investigators will follow 500 Veterans for 2 years in order to prospectively evaluate the impact of several novel, treatment-relevant factors on functional disability and SDV over time.

H1: Novel factors (mindfulness, perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, and moral injury) along with established treatment targets (psychological flexibility, self-compassion, and emotion regulation) will prospectively predict functional disability and SDV after accounting for covariates.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

377

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Temple, Texas, United States, 76504-7451
        • Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, TX
      • Waco, Texas, United States, 76711
        • Central Texas Veterans Health Care System Waco VA Medical Center, Waco, TX

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Veterans

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

The inclusion criteria for the longitudinal assessment study are as follows:

  • Potential participants include male and female
  • English-speaking OEF/OIF/OND Veterans
  • Enrolled at CTVHCS or willing to be enrolled for the purpose of participation in this study.

To be eligible, participants must be

  • able to comprehend and sign the informed consent form
  • able to complete the structured interviews and self-report assessments
  • willing to be contacted for follow-up assessments

For newly enrolled participants:

  • given that the investigators have already recruited a large sample of veterans who are reporting relatively little functional impairment, the investigators will require newly enrolled participants to self-report global functional impairment on the WHODAS 2.0 12-item self-report version equivalent to a mean item score of 1.0.

    • Although the investigators anticipate being able to meet the recruitment goals, should recruitment prove more challenging than expected, the investigators will remove this inclusion criterion
  • deemed stable on psychotropic medications (defined as 3 months on a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or monoamine oxidase inhibitor; >1 month on an anxiolytic or beta-blocker; >1 month medication discontinuation or "wash out" for all medications) at the time of the BL assessment
  • deemed stable in psychotherapy (3 months stabilization for psychotherapy and 1-month psychotherapy wash-out) at the time of the BL assessment

    • These latter two criteria are instated to ensure that symptoms assessed during the baseline assessment are due to any underlying psychiatric condition and not due to the effects of starting or stopping medications and/or psychotherapy.
  • Changes in treatment will be permissible during the current study, as this reflects real-world practice
  • All changes in medications will be monitored over time, and appropriately covaried, as treatment can have important effects on functioning over time
  • Individuals will be eligible to participate with current and lifetime psychiatric diagnoses, with the exception of:

    • schizophrenia
    • schizophreniform disorder
    • schizoaffective disorder
    • delusional disorder
    • unspecified schizophrenia spectrum/other psychotic disorder, and bipolar disorder

Additional inclusion criteria specific to the SCD treatment study are:

  • Veterans will have a global disability (mean item) score on the WHODAS 2.0 of 1.0, which is 1 SD above the mean of the large non-psychiatric sample of Veterans from SERVE and VA Boston during both of their last 2 assessments

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria for the longitudinal assessment study are as follows:

  • plan to relocate out of the CTVHCS system within four months of protocol initiation
  • meet criteria for a diagnosis of:

    • schizophrenia
    • schizophreniform disorder
    • schizoaffective disorder
    • delusional disorder
    • a manic/hypomanic episode
  • report current suicidal or homicidal risk warranting crisis intervention
  • report symptoms consistent with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) that interfere with their ability to complete the consent process or assessment

    • i.e., due to ethical concerns about obtaining informed consent and difficulties with completing the structured assessment
  • report current non-military related hallucinations or delusions that cause significant distress and/or impairment

Additional exclusion criteria for the SCD treatment study are:

  • recent (1 month) or anticipated change in psycho-pharmacological treatment. Veterans may stay on current medications but will be asked to refrain from changes to the extent possible based on safety
  • logistical circumstances that would interfere with study completion
  • Presence of a non-alcohol substance use disorder (SUD) deemed to be the primary focus of treatment

    • Those with a principal AUD will be eligible.
  • Additional diagnoses of non-alcohol SUD are allowed, unless they are deemed the principal focus of treatment.
  • Potentially eligible Veterans who score above the clinical cutoff on the DAST will be asked additional questions during the eligibility screening to determine whether they meet criteria for a principal non-alcohol SUD (see phone screen)
  • AUD/SUD of sufficient severity that residential, rather than outpatient, treatment is indicated based on potential safety concerns associated with withdrawal.

    • This determination will be made by the PI, with consultation from the Veteran's existing treatment providers, as appropriate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
SERVE assessment only
Eligible veterans will complete 4 assessments over a two year period of time.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Columbia Suicide Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 24-month
The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS; Posner et al., 2008) is a state-of-the-art suicide assessment for individuals perceived to be at high risk for suicidality. Internal consistency ranged from .73 to .95 (Posner et al., 2011). Values on the intensity of suicidal ideation (e.g., frequency, duration, controllability, deterrents, reasons for ideation) are summed to create a total score; range from 0 to 25, where higher scores indicate higher SI severity.
Baseline and 24-month
World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-month, 16-month, and 24-month
Self-report assessment of functional disability with total score and 6 domains of functioning: understanding and communicating, mobility, getting along with others, life activities (i.e., work, education, household responsibilities), participation in society, and self-care (Ustun et al., 2010). Both global and specific areas of functioning are crucial in thoroughly understanding functional recovery, as Veterans may function well in one area and have difficulty in another. Moreover, some domains may be affected by contextual factors instead of representing functional capacity (e.g., work functioning in a struggling economy independent of impairment). Means on this measure capture items from all domain subscales and can range from 0 to 3 where higher scores indicate higher levels of disability.
Baseline, 8-month, 16-month, and 24-month
Clinician Administered NSSI Disorder Index (CANDI)
Time Frame: Baseline and 24-month
The Clinician Administered NSSI Disorder Index (CANDI) is a clinical interview that diagnoses Nonsuicidal Self Injury (NSSI) disorder and type and frequency of NSSI. Demonstrated good reliability and validity in prior research. Results report the number of participants that meet for a diagnosis of NSSID.
Baseline and 24-month
Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning (IPF) - Brief
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-month, 16-month, and 24-month
Self-report measure (Marx et al., 2009; Bovin et al., 2018) of problems in different domains of life (e.g., Romantic Relationships with a Spouse/Partner, Family, Work, Friendships and Socializing, Parenting, Education, and Self-Care). The short version has a .90 correlation with the full 80-item instrument (Co-I Marx, personal communication). Adjusted totals range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate greater functional impairment.
Baseline, 8-month, 16-month, and 24-month
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSSI)
Time Frame: Baseline and 24-month
Widely-used self-report measure of intensity of thoughts and behaviors associated with suicide. Includes 2 additional items that ask about past suicide attempts as well as the level of suicidal intent during the most recent attempt. Prior research shows that endorsement of suicidal thoughts and behaviors can be greater on self-report questionnaires compared to interviews. Total scores range from 0 to 42 where higher scores indicate higher suicidal ideation.
Baseline and 24-month
Quality of Life Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-month, 16-month, and 24-month
Self-report (Burkhardt, et al., 1989) assessing how satisfied people are in different areas of their life, distinct from health status, (e.g., mate, physical well-being, relationships with others, social, community, and civic activities, personal development and fulfillment, recreation, and independence). Good internal consistency and high test-retest reliability (Burckhardt et al. 2003). Total scores range from 16 to 112 with higher scores indicating greater life satisfaction.
Baseline, 8-month, 16-month, and 24-month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Suzannah K. Creech, PhD, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, TX

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 24, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Upon written request by qualified researchers and following institutional guidelines, deidentified data may be shared if the study participant consented to data sharing.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Within one year of completion of the study

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Upon written request by qualified researchers

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe