Self-management Program in Chronic Pelvic Pain

March 3, 2020 updated by: Marie Carmen Valenza, Universidad de Granada

Self-management Intervention for Women With Chronic Pelvic Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Chronic pelvic pain is a serious health condition with an estimated prevalence of 15% women worldwide.Treatment is a challenge given the different pain generators described. It is important to develop self-management interventions to reduce the frustration associated with its management.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Chronic pelvic pain is defined as non-cyclic pain lasting for 6 or more months, that localizes to the anatomic pelvis, anterior abdominal wall at or below the umbilicus, the lumbosacral back, or the buttocks and is of sufficient severity to cause functional disability or lead to medical care. It can occur continuously or intermittently, with intensity severe enough to limit activities of daily living. It is frequent in women. The primary aim of this study isto evaluate the efficacy of a self-management intervention, as compared with an educational booklet in improving health-related quality of life and coping strategies, occupational performance, activity level and psycho-emotional symptoms in women with chronic pelvic pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Granada, Spain, 18071
        • Department of Physical Therapy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of chronic pelvic pain with at least 6 months of evolution

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active urogenital infection
  • Pregnancy
  • Cancer
  • Dementia
  • A surgical intervention involving lumbo-pelvic region over the past year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
Patients will be included in a self-management intervention.
Self-management intervention will include presentation and discussion of various topics regarding chronic pain mechanisms and pain self-monitoring. The intervention will also incorporate a task-oriented approach focused on relevant activities in order to acquire coping skills.
No Intervention: Control group
Patients will receive a booklet with information.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Change from baseline health-related quality of life at 7 weeks
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EuroQol-5D. This scale consists of a descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale. The descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, oain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. Higher scores indicate more problems. In the visual analogue scale the patient rate the pain from 100 (best imaginable health state) to 0 (worst imaginable health state). Higher values represent a better health state.
Change from baseline health-related quality of life at 7 weeks
Change in coping strategies
Time Frame: Change from baseline coping strategies at 7 weeks
Coping strategies will be evaluated using the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ). It assesses eight different coping strategies for pain which describe two types of coping: adaptive coping (diverting Attention, coping self-statements, ignoring sensations, reinterpreting pain sensation, hoping and cognitive distracting) and maladaptive coping (catastrophizing, and faithing and praying). Participants score each item using a 7-point scale to indicate how often they use that strategy to manage their pain (0 never, 3 sometimes, and 6 always)
Change from baseline coping strategies at 7 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in performance of activities
Time Frame: Change from baseline self-perceived performance at 7 weeks
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure will be used to evaluate changes in patient's self-perception over time including performance and satisfaction scored from 0 to 10. Higher values represented improvement on perceived performance and satisfaction
Change from baseline self-perceived performance at 7 weeks
Change in activity levels
Time Frame: Change from baseline self-reported activity levels at 7 weeks
Activity levels will be evaluated with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. It assess the frequency and time spent on vigorous, moderate-intensity activities and walking time for each category. Higher values indicate higher activity levels.
Change from baseline self-reported activity levels at 7 weeks
Change in anxiety levels.
Time Frame: Change from baseline anxious symptoms at 7 weeks
Anxiety will be evaluated using the Beck Anxiety Inventory. It contains 21 questions, each answer being scored on a scale value of 0 (not at all) to 3 (severely). Higher total scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms.
Change from baseline anxious symptoms at 7 weeks
Change in depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Change from baseline depressive symptoms at 7 weeks
Depression will be evaluated using the Beck Depression Inventory. It contains 21 questions, each answer being scored on a scale value of 0 (not at all) to 3 (severely). Higher total scores indicate severe depressive symptoms.
Change from baseline depressive symptoms at 7 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 23, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 21, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 29, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DF00800UG

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pelvic Pain

Clinical Trials on Self-management intervention

Subscribe