Analysis of the Sweat Response According to the Pathology in Neurologic Patients (Sudoscan)

August 20, 2018 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse

Analysis of the Sweat Response According to the Pathology in Neurologic

Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) has been shown to be an important risk factor for cardiac diseases, particularly in diabetes.

CAN may be investigated by a battery of laboratory cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests(initially described by Ewing).

First screening for CAN (as proposed in diabetic patients) can be performed by assessing heart rate (HR) response to deep breathing, blood pressure (BP) and HR response to a 5 minutes stand test

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Sweat glands are innervated by thin and un myelinated sympathetic C-fibers that can be impaired in neuropathies,especially length-dependent ones. Sweating dysfunction has been shown in several neurological peripheral disorders and it has been suggested that sweating function should be included among the diagnostic tests for the early detection of autonomic neuropathies. Several methods have been developed, but the lack of easy and quick tests to diagnose sweating dysfunction has restricted widespread use in clinical practice. Measurement of electrochemical skin conductance (ESC) using Sudoscan® is a new method for quick, non-invasive and quantitative assessment of sweating. This technique has demonstrated its usefulness in detecting autonomic and small fiber neuropathy, especially in diabetic patients.The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the laboratory battery of CV tests and of sweating dysfunction by Sudoscan®, alone or in combination, to differentiate MSA-P from PD. Among the CV tests, the present study particularly looked at those tests already recommended as screening bedside tests in diabetic patients (HR variations with deep breathing and BP variations during stand test) ; these tests are rapid and easy to perform. HR variations with deep breathing depend on parasympathetic tone and BP variations depend on vasomotor sympathetic response.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

450

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients referred to the autonomic laboratory of the neurology department at Toulouse University Hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with MSA-P or PD

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
MSA-P
Patients with multiple systeme atrophy (MSA) with predominant parkinsonism (MSA-P) had evaluation of cardiovascular function and sweating function
Sweating dysfunction by Sudoscan
Other Names:
  • sweating dysfunction by Sudoscan
Cardiovascular (CV) tests
PD patients
Parkinson's disease (PD) patients had evaluation of cardiovascular function and sweating function
Sweating dysfunction by Sudoscan
Other Names:
  • sweating dysfunction by Sudoscan
Cardiovascular (CV) tests

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sweating autonomic test
Time Frame: baseline
Evaluate the performance of the laboratory battery of CV tests and of sweating dysfunction to differentiate MSA-P from PD
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anne Pavy-Le Traon, MD, University Hospital, Toulouse

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RC31/15/7550

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neurological Disorder

Clinical Trials on sweating function

Subscribe