Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Measurement in Critically Ill PAtients Post Cardiosurgical Therapy (IMPACT)

March 2, 2021 updated by: University Hospital Inselspital, Berne

Non-invasive and Continuous Monitoring of Diastolic Blood Pressure: a Prospective Observational Study - IMPACT

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of measuring beat-by-beat diastolic blood pressure from a non-invasive, cuffless and non-obtrusive watch-like optical device worn at the wrist.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Given the prevalence of hypertension in society and the current limitations associated with oscillometric cuffs, the need for a continuous cuffless alternative for blood pressure home monitoring at a global scale is paramount. Such a device would not only improve the global control of blood pressure, but more generally, it could have a larger social impact by improving the comfort and reducing the stress for the clinical management of hypertensive patients.

In the present study the investigators seek to investigate, as a primary purpose, to evaluate the accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure measurements via a watch-like optical sensor and compare these to standard monitoring (arterial line).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Inselspital, Dept of Intensive Care Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Consecutive patients scheduled for cardiac or vascular surgery at the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of Inselspital, Bern.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled for cardiac or vascular surgery, with presence of a radial arterial line for perioperative management;
  • Willing and able to provide Informed Consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (Chronic) pace-maker/ defibrillator in situ at study inclusion;
  • Known severe aortic stenosis (mean gradient > 40 mmHg, valve area < 1 cm2);
  • Rhythmogenic heart disease (resting heart rate > 120/min) at time of study inclusion;
  • Emergency patient (i.e. unscheduled OR).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of diastolic blood pressures (in mmHg) assessed via non-invasive vs. invasive blood pressure (arterial line) measurement
Time Frame: 24 hours
Statistical comparison of both measures of diastolic blood pressure
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Descriptive assessment: time until normalization of measurement after re-calibration of diastolic blood pressure measurement using the non-invasive approach
Time Frame: 24 hours
To evaluate the influence of the re-calibration time interval (amount of time in-between two consecutive calibrations of the optical devices) on the accuracy of diastolic blood pressure assessment.
24 hours
Descriptive analysis of comparison to measurements at the fingertip (non-invasive vs. fingertip diastolic blood pressure assessment)
Time Frame: 24 hours
To compare the accuracy when applied to photoplethysmographic signals measured at the wrist versus signals measured at the fingertip.
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Reineke, MD, Dept of Cardiovascular Surgery

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Systemic Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Optical sensor, Pulse watch

Subscribe