Cardiopulmonary Changes Prolonged Surgical Abdominal Retractors Application in Supine Versus Lateral Position

June 18, 2019 updated by: Mohamed Abd Latif Ghanim, Mansoura University

Cardiopulmonary Effects of Prolonged Surgical Abdominal Retractors Application in Supine Versus Lateral Position During General Anesthesia

Introduction: Dynamic and static compliance should be calculated as a routine part of ventilator monitoring. Dynamic and static compliance are 60-100 mL/cm H2O. A decrease in dynamic compliance without a change in the static compliance suggests an acute increase in airway resistance and can be assessed further by comparing peak pressure and plateau pressure. The normal gradient is approximately 10 cm H2O. A gradient >10 cm H2O may be secondary to endotracheal tube obstruction, mucous plugging, or bronchospasm. If volume is constant, acute changes in both dynamic and static compliance suggest a decrease in respiratory system compliance that may be caused by worsening increasing abdominal pressures. When static compliance is <25 mL/cm H2O, ventilator weaning may be difficult secondary to tachypnea during spontaneous breathing trials. (1) Aim of the work: to detect the cardiopulmonary burden of surgical ring retractors application during abdominal surgeries in supine versus lateral position (cancer bladder for supine position and open surgical nephrectomy for lateral position). Hypothesis: Abdominal retractors application would produce more cardiopulmonary instability during lateral position than during supine position for abdominal surgery. Patient & Methods: This comparative prospective randomized study, will be done on ASA I-II patients, both sexes, Age 18 - 65 year, to compare pulmonary compliance and cardiac performance before, during and after surgical self-retaining abdominal retractors application patients will be divided into 2 groups; 1st group (S) will undergo orthotropic cancer bladder diversion and the 2nd group (L) both supine and lateral position for open surgical nephrectomy for lateral position.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Introduction: Dynamic and static compliance should be calculated as a routine part of ventilator monitoring. Dynamic and static compliance are 60-100 mL/cm H2O. A decrease in dynamic compliance without a change in the static compliance suggests an acute increase in airway resistance and can be assessed further by comparing peak pressure and plateau pressure. The normal gradient is approximately 10 cm H2O. A gradient >10 cm H2O may be secondary to endotracheal tube obstruction, mucous plugging, or bronchospasm. If volume is constant, acute changes in both dynamic and static compliance suggest a decrease in respiratory system compliance that may be caused by worsening increasing abdominal pressures. When static compliance is <25 mL/cm H2O, ventilator weaning may be difficult secondary to tachypnea during spontaneous breathing trials. (1) Aim of the work: to detect the cardiopulmonary burden of surgical ring retractors application during abdominal surgeries in supine versus lateral position (cancer bladder for supine position and open surgical nephrectomy for lateral position). Hypothesis: Abdominal retractors application would produce more cardiopulmonary instability during lateral position than during supine position for abdominal surgery. Patient & Methods: This comparative prospective randomized study, will be done on ASA I-II patients, both sexes, Age 18 - 65 year, to compare pulmonary compliance and cardiac performance before, during and after surgical self-retaining abdominal retractors application patients will be divided into 2 groups; 1st group (S) will undergo orthotropic cancer bladder diversion and the 2nd group (L) both supine and lateral position for open surgical nephrectomy for lateral position. Study will be done at Mansoura University Hospital, during the year 2018, for 4 month duration, starting predected date=1-11-2018 actual study start date=15-12-2018[ NB. by mistake in the 1st registration i have regestered the study protocol predicted time of study start but actually the study started on 15-12-2018 thats why i changed the date more than one time ] till 30-3-2019 after approval of IRB (Institutional Review Board), Mansoura Faculty of Medicine. Primary outcome; composite 1ry outcome [1-Dynamic pulmonary compliance.2- Cardiac Index] during and after surgical retractor application compared to the same variables reading prior retractor application and in between both groups. Secondary outcome: Static lung compliance, Cardiac output, Stroke volume SV - stroke volume variability (SVV)-Cardiac performance index CPI, O2 delivery DIO2. Noninvasive Intraoperative hemodynamic (MBP, HR, O2 saturation)] during and after surgical ring retractor application compared to the same variable reading prior retractor application and in between both groups.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Dakahlia
      • Mansourah, Dakahlia, Egypt, 35511
        • Mansoura faculty of Medicine- Mansoura Urology and nephrology center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

-Patients admitted to the Urology Department, Mansoura Urology and Nephrology center, Faculty of medicine Mansoura University .

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA I-II patients
  • both sexes
  • Age 18 - 65 year
  • surgical time ≥ 6hours for Orthotopic urinary bladder diversion surgery for cancer bladder patients and 3 hours for open surgical nephrectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Body mass index (BMI) greater than 35 kg. m-2.
  • Asthma requiring bronchodilator therapy.
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, GOLD classification III and IV.
  • Severe pulmonary disease.
  • Hemodynamic instability (hypotension or tachycardia).
  • History of congestive heart failure or New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class IV
  • Right ventricular dysfunction.
  • Severe valvular heart disease.
  • Intra-cardiac shunts.
  • Intracranial hypertension.
  • Cardiac rhythm other than regular sinus.
  • Severe chronic kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml. min-1. 1.73 m2).
  • Liver cirrhosis (Child Pugh class B or C).
  • Pregnancy.
  • Previous thoracic surgery (lobectomy, bilobectomy, or pneumonectomy).
  • Lung metastatic surgery.
  • Previous receiving chemotherapy.
  • Emergency surgery.
  • Preoperative need for invasive mechanical ventilation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
supine position group= Group (S)
1st group of 20 patients will undergo urinary bladder cystectomy and orthotopic urinary diversion lying supine with ring abdominal retractors
Primary outcome; composite 1ry outcome [1-Dynamic pulmonary compliance monitoring.2- Cardiac Index monitoring] during and after surgical retractor application compared to the same variables reading prior retractor application and in between both groups. Secondary outcome: Static lung compliance, Cardiac output, Stroke volume SV - stroke volume variability (SVV)-Cardiac performance index, O2 delivery DIO2. Noninvasive Intraoperative hemodynamic (MBP, HR, O2 saturation)] during and after surgical ring retractor application compared to the same variable reading prior retractor application and in between both groups.
lateral position group = Group (L)
2nd group of 20 patients will undergo surgical open nephrectomy lying lateral position with self retaining abdominal retractors
Primary outcome; composite 1ry outcome [1-Dynamic pulmonary compliance monitoring.2- Cardiac Index monitoring] during and after surgical retractor application compared to the same variables reading prior retractor application and in between both groups. Secondary outcome: Static lung compliance, Cardiac output, Stroke volume SV - stroke volume variability (SVV)-Cardiac performance index, O2 delivery DIO2. Noninvasive Intraoperative hemodynamic (MBP, HR, O2 saturation)] during and after surgical ring retractor application compared to the same variable reading prior retractor application and in between both groups.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
-non invasive Dynamic pulmonary compliance .
Time Frame: mean dynamic compliance at minutes 30,60,90,120,180,210 240 post retractor application compared to mean dynamic compliance at minutes 10,20,30,post endotracheal intubation(Basal Value preretractor application)
dynamic pulmonary compliance during and after surgical retractor application compared to the same variables reading prior retractor application and in between both groups
mean dynamic compliance at minutes 30,60,90,120,180,210 240 post retractor application compared to mean dynamic compliance at minutes 10,20,30,post endotracheal intubation(Basal Value preretractor application)
Non invasive Cardiac Index
Time Frame: mean Non invasive Cardiac Index at minutes 30,60,90,120,180,210 240 post retractor application compared to mean Non invasive Cardiac Index at minutes 10,20,30,post endotracheal intubation(Basal Value preretractor application)
Cardiac index monitoring during and after surgical retractor application compared to the same variables reading prior retractor application and in between both groups
mean Non invasive Cardiac Index at minutes 30,60,90,120,180,210 240 post retractor application compared to mean Non invasive Cardiac Index at minutes 10,20,30,post endotracheal intubation(Basal Value preretractor application)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Static lung compliance
Time Frame: After endotracheal intubation recorded 3 times every 10 minutes -After Abdominal retractors application recorded every 30 minutes for 6 readings -After retractor removal 3 times every 10 minutes
Static lung compliance during and after surgical retractor application compared to the same variables reading prior retractor application and in between both groups
After endotracheal intubation recorded 3 times every 10 minutes -After Abdominal retractors application recorded every 30 minutes for 6 readings -After retractor removal 3 times every 10 minutes
Cardiac output.
Time Frame: After endotracheal intubation recorded 3 times every 10 minutes -After Abdominal retractors application recorded every 30 minutes for 6 readings -After retractor removal 3 times every 10 minutes
Cardiac output. during and after surgical retractor application compared to the same variables reading prior retractor application and in between both groups
After endotracheal intubation recorded 3 times every 10 minutes -After Abdominal retractors application recorded every 30 minutes for 6 readings -After retractor removal 3 times every 10 minutes
Stroke volume SV
Time Frame: After endotracheal intubation recorded 3 times every 10 minutes -After Abdominal retractors application recorded every 30 minutes for 6 readings -After retractor removal 3 times every 10 minutes
Stroke volume SV. during and after surgical retractor application compared to the same variables reading prior retractor application and in between both groups
After endotracheal intubation recorded 3 times every 10 minutes -After Abdominal retractors application recorded every 30 minutes for 6 readings -After retractor removal 3 times every 10 minutes
- stroke volume variability (SVV)
Time Frame: After endotracheal intubation recorded 3 times every 10 minutes -After Abdominal retractors application recorded every 30 minutes for 6 readings -After retractor removal 3 times every 10 minutes
Stroke volume variability (SVV)during and after surgical retractor application compared to the same variables reading prior retractor application and in between both groups
After endotracheal intubation recorded 3 times every 10 minutes -After Abdominal retractors application recorded every 30 minutes for 6 readings -After retractor removal 3 times every 10 minutes
-Cardiac performance index CPI
Time Frame: After endotracheal intubation recorded 3 times every 10 minutes -After Abdominal retractors application recorded every 30 minutes for 6 readings -After retractor removal 3 times every 10 minutes
Cardiac performance index during and after surgical retractor application compared to the same variables reading prior retractor application and in between both groups
After endotracheal intubation recorded 3 times every 10 minutes -After Abdominal retractors application recorded every 30 minutes for 6 readings -After retractor removal 3 times every 10 minutes
Oxygen delivery DIO2
Time Frame: After endotracheal intubation recorded 3 times every 10 minutes -After Abdominal retractors application recorded every 30 minutes for 6 readings -After retractor removal 3 times every 10 minutes
Oxygen delivery DIO2 during and after surgical retractor application compared to the same variables reading prior retractor application and in between both groups
After endotracheal intubation recorded 3 times every 10 minutes -After Abdominal retractors application recorded every 30 minutes for 6 readings -After retractor removal 3 times every 10 minutes
. Noninvasive Intraoperative MBP
Time Frame: After endotracheal intubation recorded 3 times every 10 minutes -After Abdominal retractors application recorded every 30 minutes for 6 readings -After retractor removal 3 times every 10 minutes
Noninvasive Intraoperative MBP during and after surgical retractor application compared to the same variables reading prior retractor application and in between both groups
After endotracheal intubation recorded 3 times every 10 minutes -After Abdominal retractors application recorded every 30 minutes for 6 readings -After retractor removal 3 times every 10 minutes
HR
Time Frame: After endotracheal intubation recorded 3 times every 10 minutes -After Abdominal retractors application recorded every 30 minutes for 6 readings -After retractor removal 3 times every 10 minutes
HR during and after surgical retractor application compared to the same variables reading prior retractor application and in between both groups
After endotracheal intubation recorded 3 times every 10 minutes -After Abdominal retractors application recorded every 30 minutes for 6 readings -After retractor removal 3 times every 10 minutes
arterial O2 saturation(SaO2%)
Time Frame: After endotracheal intubation recorded 3 times every 10 minutes -After Abdominal retractors application recorded every 30 minutes for 6 readings -After retractor removal 3 times every 10 minutes
SaO2 saturation during and after surgical retractor application compared to the same variables reading prior retractor application and in between both groups
After endotracheal intubation recorded 3 times every 10 minutes -After Abdominal retractors application recorded every 30 minutes for 6 readings -After retractor removal 3 times every 10 minutes
End tidal Co2 EtCO2
Time Frame: After endotracheal intubation recorded 3 times every 10 minutes -After Abdominal retractors application recorded every 30 minutes for 6 readings -After retractor removal 3 times every 10 minutes
End tidal Co2 EtCO2 during and after surgical retractor application compared to the same variables reading prior retractor application and in between both groups
After endotracheal intubation recorded 3 times every 10 minutes -After Abdominal retractors application recorded every 30 minutes for 6 readings -After retractor removal 3 times every 10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mohamed A. Ghanem, A professor, Mansoura Univeristy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R.18.11.337

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardio-pulmonary

Clinical Trials on monitoring

3
Subscribe