Fundamental Intelligent Building Blocks of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the Future: Intelligent ICU of the Future

June 2, 2025 updated by: University of Florida

Intelligent ICU of the Future Subtitles: *Autonomous Pain Recognition in Non-Verbal and Critically Ill Patients *Fundamental Intelligent Building Blocks of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the Future *Intelligent Intensive Care Unit (I2CU): Pervasive Sensing and Artificial Intelligence for Augmented Clinical Decision-making *ADAPT: Autonomous Delirium Monitoring and Adaptive Prevention

The objective of this project is to create deep learning and machine learning models capable of recognizing patient visual cues, including facial expressions such as pain and functional activity. Many important details related to the visual assessment of patients, such as facial expressions like pain, head and extremity movements, posture, and mobility are captured sporadically by overburdened nurses or are not captured at all. Consequently, these important visual cues, although associated with critical indices, such as physical functioning, pain, and impending clinical deterioration, often cannot be incorporated into clinical status. The study team will develop a sensing system to recognize facial and body movements as patient visual cues. As part of a secondary evaluation method the study team will assess the models ability to detect delirium.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pain is a critical national health problem with nearly 50% of critical care patients experience significant pain in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The under-assessment of pain response is one of the primary barriers to the adequate treatment of pain in critically ill patients, associated with many negative outcomes such as chronic pain after discharge, prolonged mechanical ventilation, longer ICU stay, and increased mortality risk. Nonetheless, many ICU patients are unable to self-report pain intensity due to clinical conditions, ventilation devices, and altered consciousness. Currently, behavioral pain scales are used to assess pain in nonverbal patients. Unfortunately, these scales require repetitive manual administration by overburdened nurses. Moreover, prior work suggests that nurses caring for quasi-sedated patients in critical care settings have considerable variability in pain intensity ratings. Furthermore, manual pain assessment tools lack the capability to monitor pain continuously and autonomously. Together, these challenges point to a critical need for developing objective and autonomous pain recognition systems.

Delirium is another common complication of hospitalization that poses significant health problems in hospitalized patients. It is most prevalent in surgical ICU patients with diagnosis rates up to 80%. It is characterized by changes in cognition, activity level, consciousness, and alertness. Delirium typically leads to changes in activity level and alertness that pose additional health risks including risk of fall, inadequate mobilization, disturbed sleep, inadequate pain control, and negative emotions. All of these effects are difficult to monitor in real-time and further contribute to worsening of patient's cognitive abilities, inhibit recovery, and slow down the rehabilitation process. Though about a third of delirium cases can benefit from intervention, detecting and predicting delirium is still very limited in practice. Current Delirium assessments need to be performed by trained healthcare staff, are time consuming, and resource intensive. Due to the resources necessary to complete the assessment, delirium is often assessed twice per day, despite the transient nature of the disease state which can come and go undetected between the assessments. Jointly these obstacles demonstrate a dire need for real-time autonomous delirium detection.

The investigators hypothesize that the proposed model would be able to leverage accelerometer, electromyographic, and video data for the purpose of autonomously quantifying patient facial expressions such as pain, characterizing functional activities, and delirium status. Rationalizing that autonomous visual cue quantification and delirium detection can reduce nurse workload and can enable real-time pain and delirium monitoring. Early detection of delirium offers patients the best chance for good delirium treatment outcomes.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32608
        • UF Health Shands Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults in the ICU or Adults visiting recruited patients in the ICU

Description

ICU Patients:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient admitted to University of Florida (UF) Health Gainesville ICU

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anticipated ICU stay is less than one day
  • Patient is on any form of contact precaution or isolation
  • Patient is unable to wear a Shimmer3 unit

ICU Patient Friends/Family:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individual has their name designated on a patient's informed consent form giving them permission to view and modify facial and activity data collected about that patient

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18
  • They are unable to answer short questions on a touch screen display
  • They are unable to wear a proximity sensor
  • They were not on the listed of designated individuals specified in their friend/family members informed consent form

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
ICU Patients
Adults in admitted to an ICU at University of Florida Health Gainesville with an expected length of stay greater than 24 hours which are not on any form of contact precaution or isolation. Patients will have continuous video, accelerometer, and electromyographic monitoring for up to seven days while in the ICU.
Patients may have video monitoring for up to seven days while in the ICU. The video system will be placed in an unobtrusive area in the patient's ICU room.
Patients may have accelerometer monitoring for up to seven days while in the ICU. Commercially available accelerometer units, which have been validated in previous clinical studies, will be used.
Patients may have electromyographic monitoring for up to seven days while in the ICU.
Other Names:
  • EMG monitoring
Patients may have noise level monitoring (in decibels) for up to seven days while in the ICU.
Patients may have light level monitoring for up to seven days while in the ICU.
ICU Patient Friends/Family Members
Adult visitors of participating ICU patients that are willing to provide feedback to the learning algorithms.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Defense Veterans Pain Reporting Scale (DVPRS)
Time Frame: Before hospital discharge, up to Day 8
Before discharge, patients will be shown three short video clips from their ICU admission and asked to rate their pain levels using the Defense Veterans Pain Reporting Scale. DVPRS is a 10 point visual scale used to self report pain (0-4 being mild pain; 5-7 being moderate pain; 8-10 being severe pain).
Before hospital discharge, up to Day 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 3, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 18, 2022

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB201900354 -N
  • 1750192 (Other Grant/Funding Number: National Science Foundation)
  • 1R21EB027344-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • R01NS120924-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • OCR20330 (Other Identifier: UF OnCore)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Video Monitoring

Subscribe