Low-level Laser Therapy Versus Formocresol in Primary Molar Pulpotomies

December 18, 2018 updated by: Najlaa Alamoudi, King Abdulaziz University

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Low-level Laser Therapy in Human Primary Molar Pulpotomies: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

This study aimed to assess and compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of LLLT and FC for pulpotomy in human primary teeth. One hundred and six primary molars from 36 children aging five to eight years were included and randomly assigned into two equal groups; LLLT group and FC group. Teeth were evaluated clinically and radiographically at 3, 6 and 12 months.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background: Various agents are available to dress the remaining pulp tissue after pulpotomy procedure with the formocresol (FC) being the gold standard for the last 60 years. Nowadays, low-level laser therapy (LLLT) becomes a technique of interest, due to its many characteristics. However, the literature available on its success in pulpotomy is limited and reported conflicting results.

Aim of the study: To assess and compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of LLLT and FC for pulpotomy in human primary teeth.

Materials and methods: Utilizing split-mouth technique, the sample consisted of 106 primary molars from 36 children aging five to eight years. The teeth were selected based on specific clinical and radiographic inclusion criteria and randomly assigned into two equal groups; LLLT group and FC group. All the 106 primary molars were indicated for pulpotomy, where 53 teeth were treated using FC and 53 teeth were treated with LLLT. Teeth were evaluated clinically and radiographically at 3, 6 and 12 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 21589
        • King Abdulaziz University, Dental University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 4 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Children inclusion criteria:

  • Children aged 5-8 years with at least two bilateral deep carious primary molars indicated for pulpotomy.
  • Children who are physically and mentally healthy without any known medical history of systemic conditions contraindicating pulp therapy.
  • Children who had "positive" or "definitely positive" behavioral ratings according to the Frankl behavior classification scale (Frankl, 1962).
  • Children whose parents signed an informed consent for the child's participation in the study.

Teeth inclusion criteria:

Teeth were selected according to clinical and radiographic criteria.

Clinically, the study included:

  • Teeth with restorable crowns
  • Teeth with pathologic carious exposure of vital pulps
  • Teeth with no tenderness to percussion, physiologic or pathologic mobility or any clinical evidence of pulp inflammation or degeneration such as history of swelling, pain or presence of sinus tract.

Radiographically, the recruited teeth should have:

  • Normal radiographic appearance with healthy supporting tissues
  • No pulp calcification
  • No internal or external root resorption
  • No periapical or inter-radicular radiolucency
  • At least two thirds of the root remaining (not more than one third of the root is physiologically resorbed)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any child complained of clinical signs such as pain, swelling, abnormal mobility, vertical or lateral tenderness to percussion was excluded from the study.
  • Radiographically, any child with signs of internal or external root resorption or periapical or inter-radicular pathology was omitted from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Low-level laser therapy group
This group of teeth received laser irradiation after amputation of coronal pulp
It is a diode laser device that has laser set at low level, used for pain relief and inflammation reduction to induce healing
No Intervention: Formocresol group
This group of teeth received the gold standard medication (formocresol) after coronal pulp amputation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical success rate
Time Frame: 3 months
The pulpotomy procedure was considered clinically successful if there were no pain, swelling, tenderness to percussion, abscess or abnormal mobility
3 months
Clinical success rate
Time Frame: 6 months
The pulpotomy procedure was considered clinically successful if there were no pain, swelling, tenderness to percussion, abscess or abnormal mobility
6 months
Clinical success rate
Time Frame: 12 months
The pulpotomy procedure was considered clinically successful if there were no pain, swelling, tenderness to percussion, abscess or abnormal mobility
12 months
Radiographic success rate
Time Frame: 3 months

The pulpotomy procedure was considered clinically successful if it demonstrated the following criteria:

  1. Normal periodontal ligament space
  2. No inter-radicular or periapical radiolucency
  3. No internal or external root resorption
3 months
Radiographic success rate
Time Frame: 6 months

The pulpotomy procedure was considered clinically successful if it demonstrated the following criteria:

  1. Normal periodontal ligament space
  2. No inter-radicular or periapical radiolucency
  3. No internal or external root resorption
6 months
Radiographic success rate
Time Frame: 12 months

The pulpotomy procedure was considered clinically successful if it demonstrated the following criteria:

  1. Normal periodontal ligament space
  2. No inter-radicular or periapical radiolucency
  3. No internal or external root resorption
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Alaa Nadhreen

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulpotomy

Clinical Trials on Low-level laser therapy

Subscribe