Assessment of I-PRF Versus Nano MTA Combined with I-PRF Scaffold in Vital Pulp Therapy in Mature Mandibular First Molars

October 10, 2024 updated by: Abdelrahman Mohamed Elsayed Metwally Omar, Future University in Egypt

Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of I-PRF Versus Nano Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Combined with I-PRF Scaffold in Vital Pulp Therapy in Mandibular First Molars with Closed Apices: "Randomized Controlled Trial"

Assessment of I-PRF versus Nano Mineral trioxide aggregate Combined with I-PRF in pulpotomy in mature Mandibular First Molars

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of I-PRF versus Nano Mineral trioxide aggregate Combined with I-PRF Scaffold in Vital Pulp Therapy in Mandibular First Molars with Closed Apices: "Randomized Controlled Trial"

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11835
        • Recruiting
        • Future university in egypt
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients suffering from Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mature mandibular molars only will be involved.

    • Patients of either gender aged from 15-30.
    • Tooth should give positive response to cold test.
    • The tooth is restorable
    • Patients should be free from any systemic disease that may affect normal healing and predictable outcome.
    • Patients who will agree to the consent and will commit to follow-up period.
    • Patients with mature root.
    • Patients with no internal or external resorption and no periapical lesions.
    • Soft tissues around the tooth are normal with no swelling or sinus tract.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with immature roots.

    • Haemostasias after 10 minutes can not be controlled after total pulpotomy
    • Patients with periapical lesions or infections.
    • Pregnant females.
    • Patients with fistula or swelling
    • Patients with necrotic pulp.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: MTA Pulpotomy
using MTA as pulpotomy capping agent in mature permanent teeth
Removal of coronal pulp tissue and then placing pulpotomy agent
Other Names:
  • vital pulp therapy
  • full pulpotomy
Experimental: I-PRF pulpotomy
using I-PRF as pulpotomy capping agent in mature permanent teeth
Removal of coronal pulp tissue and then placing pulpotomy agent
Other Names:
  • vital pulp therapy
  • full pulpotomy
Experimental: I-PRF combined with Nano MTA pulpotomy
using nano MTA mixed with I-prf as pulpotomy capping agent in mature permanent teeth
Removal of coronal pulp tissue and then placing pulpotomy agent
Other Names:
  • vital pulp therapy
  • full pulpotomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post operative pain assessments
Time Frame: 6 hours post operative , 12 hours post operative , 24h (one day) post operative , 72h (3 days ) post operative and 7 days (one week) post operative
Pain assessments were made postoperatively with numerical rate scale. The scale includes scores from 0 to 10 where 0 indicates no pain , scores 1 to 3 indicates mild pain , scores 4 to 6 indicates moderate and scores 7 to 10 indicates severe pain.
6 hours post operative , 12 hours post operative , 24h (one day) post operative , 72h (3 days ) post operative and 7 days (one week) post operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical and radiographic success
Time Frame: 1 month post operative ,3 months clinical and radiograph ,6 months clinical and radiograph ,9 months clinical and radiograph and 12 months clinical and radiograph.

Clinically success : this includes that the tooth must be symptoms free ( No pain on percussion , no pain on biting and no pain with cold and hot ) . Also the tooth must not has any signs of failure as appearance of sinus tract or fistula during the follow up periods.

Radiographic success : this includes that the tooth did not develop a periapical radiolucency as periapical periodontitis .

Any deviation from the previous success criteria ( as clinical or radiographic ) considered as failure and the tooth will be shifted to root canal treatment.

1 month post operative ,3 months clinical and radiograph ,6 months clinical and radiograph ,9 months clinical and radiograph and 12 months clinical and radiograph.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Abdelrahman Mo Omar, Master, Future university in egypt

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 3, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 2, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 2, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • (32)/8-2023

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulpotomy

Clinical Trials on pulpotomy

Subscribe