Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With Recombinant Human Adenovirus Type 5 in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

October 15, 2019 updated by: fengkai, Southwest Hospital, China

Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With Local Injection of Recombinant Human Adenovirus Type 5 in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma:A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

The primary reason for recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the micro-metastatic lesion that has not been ablated and inactivated in the transitional area.Some clinical trials have confirmed that H101(recombinant human adenovirus type 5 injection) has selective oncolysis in a variety of solid tumors.However, there are no reports that H101 which is injected during surgery can improve the efficacy of RFA in liver cancer at present.Therefore,We used a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study as the main method to prospectively compare the short-term and long-term efficacy of RFA combined with H101 group and traditional RFA group in the treatment of small liver cancer (single lesion , diameter less than or equal to 3cm,to evaluate the value of RFA combined with H101 injection in reducing the postoperative recurrence rate of small hepatocellular carcinoma, and to provide a reliable evidence-based medical basis for the selection of treatment methods for small hepatocellular carcinoma.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The primary reason for recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the micro-metastatic lesion that has not been ablated and inactivated in the transitional area.Oncolytic virus H101 is a genetically engineered adenovirus that lacks Elb 55ku protein.Some clinical trials have confirmed that H101 has selective oncolysis in a variety of solid tumors.Furthermore,research shows that the directly dissolving tumor activity of H101 enhanced obviously and activate the body's anti-tumor immune to induce the distal antitumor effect under the condition of mild high temperature (40 ℃ and 42 ℃).The transition zone of RFA can provide the appropriate mild high temperature.However, there are no reports that H101 which is injected during surgery can improve the efficacy of RFA in liver cancer at present.Therefore,We used a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study as the main method to prospectively compare the short-term and long-term efficacy of RFA combined with H101 group and traditional RFA group in the treatment of small liver cancer (single lesion , diameter less than or equal to 3cm,to evaluate the value of RFA combined with H101 injection in reducing the postoperative recurrence rate of small hepatocellular carcinoma, and to provide a reliable evidence-based medical basis for the selection of treatment methods for small hepatocellular carcinoma.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chongqing, China, 400038
        • Recruiting
        • Institute of hepatobiliary surgery,southwest hospital
    • Chongqing
      • Chongqing, Chongqing, China, 400038
        • Recruiting
        • Institute of hepatobiliary surgery,southwest hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The patients understand the content and significance of the study and we obtain a written informed consent from them.
  2. The patients' gender are not limited and are between the ages of 18 and 75.
  3. Liver function of Child-Pugh Class A or B;The retention rate of indocyanine green for 15 minutes is less than or equal to 20%.
  4. The ECOG score is 0.
  5. The diagnosis was a single hepatocellular carcinoma with a diameter of no more than 3cm.
  6. There were no other related diseases affecting RFA treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. There are tumor emboli in the large vessels of the liver;distant metastasis of HCC.
  2. The patient has or has had a history of refractory ascites,hepatic encephalopathy, or esophageal varices hemorrhage.
  3. The patient was complicated with other malignant tumors.
  4. The patient has severe cardiac, renal and other organ dysfunction.
  5. In addition to viral hepatitis, there are other active infectious diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: RFA combined with H101 group
The experimental group was RFA combined H101.H101 has oncolysis in HCC after RFA and reduce tumor recurrence.
Intraoperative injection of H101 can improve the efficacy of RFA in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Other Names:
  • Recombinant Human Adenovirus Type 5 Injection(H101).
Treat the samll HCC with the RFA.
Other Names:
  • Radiofrequency ablation(RFA).
Other: Conventional RFA group
The standard control group was the conventional RFA.Using RFA for the treatment of small HCC.The efficacy was compared with that of the experimental group combined with H101.
Treat the samll HCC with the RFA.
Other Names:
  • Radiofrequency ablation(RFA).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tumor-free survival
Time Frame: two-years tumor-free survival.
Postoperative tumor-free survival is an evaluation of tumor recurrence and metastasis.It's also an evaluation of the efficacy of the experimental group
two-years tumor-free survival.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: two-years overall survival.
The percentage of patients who receive certain treatments and are still alive after years of follow-up.
two-years overall survival.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on H101

3
Subscribe