Assessment of Effectiveness Ex-Press Surgery Modification

January 14, 2019 updated by: Military Institute of Medicine, Poland

Comparison of ExPress Implantation Versus Partial Deep Sclerectomy Combined With ExPress Implantation With Simultaneously Phacoemulsification

The purpose of the study is to compare the effectiveness and safety profile of ExPress implantation versus partial deep sclerectomy combined with ExPress implantation with simultaneously phacoemulsification.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Mermoud et all (1) proposed a modification of the classical surgical technique: combined deep sclerectomy (DS) with ExPress device implantation. The goal of this modification was to enhance hypotensive effect of well known procedure, and also to simplify non-penetrating surgery, which is a procedure with a long learning curve. Mermoud's idea provides the possibility of avoiding complications related to dissection of the filtering bleb and gives hope for achieve of better results in comparison to the classical procedure. Thanks to this, the surgical procedure could be performed earlier, even in the case of glaucoma with low intraocular pressure (IOP), where vascular factors are largely responsible for the progression of neuropathy. To demonstrate the potential of both types of procedures with the application of the ExPress implant, the authors decided to conduct a prospective, randomized study with a 2-year observation period concerning the efficacy, safety and stability of effects achieved.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

186

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • co-existing glaucoma and cataract (NC1, NC2) classified by means of the LOCS III scale
  • patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PGX) and normal tension glaucoma (NTG), in which a satisfactory IOP level was not achieved despite maximum tolerable hypotensive treatment, both topical and systemic,
  • documented progression of loss of field of vision,
  • significant daily IOP fluctuations,
  • no cooperation from patient with regard to application of anti-glaucoma treatment,
  • allergy to topical medication
  • written consent to involvement and participation in the study for a period of at least 24 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no consent to participation in the study
  • prior surgical and laser procedures in the area of the eye
  • narrow- or closed-angle glaucoma
  • post-inflammatory or post-traumatic secondary glaucoma
  • chronic illness of the cornea or optic nerve
  • advanced macular degeneration
  • active inflammatory process
  • pregnancy
  • systemic steroid therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: phaco and Ex-Press
patients with co-existing cataract and glaucoma, qualified to the combined glaucoma surgery according to the protocol which were randomized to phacoemulsification with implantation of the Ex-Press
The conjunctiva is dissected with the base in the limbus. A square scleral flap is dissected with the based in the limbus. Phacoemulsification is performed through a corneal incision 2.75 mm from the temple using the phaco-chop technique. Mini seton was implanted at 12 o'clock according to the standard technique.
Active Comparator: deep sclerectomy, phaco and Ex-press
patients with co-existing cataract and glaucoma, qualified to the combined glaucoma surgery according to the protocol which were randomized to deep sclerectomy, phacoemulsification, ExPress implantation
The conjunctiva is dissected with the base in the limbus. Superficial flap is dissected with the based in the limbus. Phacoemulsification is performed through a corneal incision 2.75 mm from the temple using the phaco-chop technique. Deep scleral is dissected just below the trabeculo-Descemet membrane. The seton is implanted in the anterior chamber at the height of Schlemm's Canal.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
IOP
Time Frame: baseline, and 24th month after surgery
the change in level of intraocular pressure
baseline, and 24th month after surgery
CDVA
Time Frame: baseline, and 24th month after surgery
the change in corrected distance visual acuity
baseline, and 24th month after surgery
number of drugs
Time Frame: baseline, and 24th month after surgery
the change in number of antiglaucoma medications
baseline, and 24th month after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of complications
Time Frame: in a day of surgery
rate of complications
in a day of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marek Rękas, Prof, Military Institute of Medicine in Warsaw

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 15/WIM/2010

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available within 18 months of study completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data access requests will be reviewed by the Chair Person. Requestors will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe