Can a Pulmonologist Reliably Assess the Tumor Burden on ROSE Slides Obtained From Pulmonary Nodules and Lymphadenopathy

August 14, 2019 updated by: Rocco Trisolini, Maggiore Bellaria Hospital, Bologna

Interobserver Agreement Between Pulmonologist, Pathologist and Molecular Pathologist in the Assessment of Tumor Burden on ROSE Slides Obtained With Endoscopic Procedures From Pulmonary Nodules and Intrathoracic Lymphadenopathy

The study is aimed at verifying if a pulmonologist can reliably assess the tumor burden for the extractive molecular analysis in ROSE samples obtained with endoscopic sampling procedures from intrathoracic lymphadenopathy and pulmonary nodules.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

164

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bologna, Italy
        • Policlinico S. Orsola
    • Emilia Romagna
      • Bologna, Emilia Romagna, Italy, 40133
        • Maggiore Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with indication to bronchoscopy or endosonography for suspected lung cancer based on imaging (CT and/or PET)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Indication for endoscopic sampling of suspected malignant lymphadenopathy or pulmonary lesion
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High risk conditions for the performance of bronchoscopy and/or EBUS-TBNA
  • High risk condition for deep sedation (ASA 4)
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE)
Evaluation, made by a pulmonologist, a pathologist and a molecular pathologist, of the tumor burden in ROSE slides produced from endoscopic procedures aimed at sampling intrathoracic lymphadenopathy and pulmonary nodules
Specimens obtained with endoscopic sampling procedures are stained with a rapid method (i.e., Diff Qui) and submitted to on-site cytologic review

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy with which a pulmonologist can assess the tumor burden on ROSE slides
Time Frame: The time frame is the duration of each bronchoscopy with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for each patient enrolled
The outcome 1 will be measured by verifying the agreement between the pulmonologist judgment and the molecular pathologist judgment, the latter being the gold standard
The time frame is the duration of each bronchoscopy with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for each patient enrolled

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interobserver agreement between pulmonologist, pathologist and molecular pathologist in then assessment of the tumor burden on ROSE slides
Time Frame: The time frame is the duration of each bronchoscopy with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for each patient enrolled
The outcome 2 will be measured by verifying the agreement between the 3 professionals, using the judgment of the molecular pathologist as gold standard
The time frame is the duration of each bronchoscopy with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for each patient enrolled
Accuracy with which a pulmonologist can identify malignancy on ROSE samples
Time Frame: The time frame is the duration of each bronchoscopy endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for each patient enrolled
The outcome 3 will be measured by verifying the agreement between pulmonologist and pathologist, the latter being the gold standard
The time frame is the duration of each bronchoscopy endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for each patient enrolled

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rocco Trisolini, MD, Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 18, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Rapid on-site evaluation

Subscribe